Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
So who are our new owners then? Board looking for new investors p14
Comments
-
Cawley confirming it is correct.2
-
Probably needed just to stay up at this level1
-
Wanting out at the first sight of trouble 😀.11
-
Doubt this is directly related to anything going on on the pitch. Suspect this will have been planned for a while, as these sorts of things take time.
If they are able to sell shares at a 100m valuation, that would be a multi-fold increase on their investment, which would be impressive in what, 2.5 years?0 -

78 -
"I suspect they’ll be dangling 20% or so for £20m."
The last sentance reads like they are guessing.
It values the club at £100m when they bought it for approx £12.5m so a 8 fold increase. Yeah, we've been promoted but seems a big jump.
Glass half full, they are raising cash to fund squad/ground improvements.
Glass half empty, they are raising cash to recoup their investment and further losses.
I'm more more in the former camp. More rich owners means more pockets to dip into and spreads the costs while maybe giving Nathan a transfer kitty.6 -
It's also a good hedge in case we are relegated.
The owners get their initial stakes back and likely more cash on top and will still have an 80% stake.4 -
7
-
Surely got to be looking at buying the real estate from Roland?
Priority #1 is staying up and consolidating in Championship then buy the real estate???
Hope this is positive for the club3 -
I would imagine it gets some of their money back if it goes through; but if I recall they bought us for £12M. Have lost £10M a year since, so multiply that by 3 by the end of this season and they are already £42M down so half of that they get back.
Not sure it means much more invested in the club as FFP must be starting to limit that - unless spent on infrastructure or youth teams.5 -
Sponsored links:
-
Looks like they want to reduce their exposure to running costs of Charlton.1
-
Why are they asking BDT & MSD Partners to look for them?
Surely Friedman's Canyon partners would do it for diddly??1 -
Presume this was what Nathan cryptically referred to last week.0
-
Nah, suspect it was something else.Fanny Fanackapan said:Presume this was what Nathan cryptically referred to last week.
1 -
Rothko said:
Nah, suspect it was something else.Fanny Fanackapan said:Presume this was what Nathan cryptically referred to last week.
Ooh, any hints welcomed, thanks.Rothko said:
Nah, suspect it was something else.Fanny Fanackapan said:Presume this was what Nathan cryptically referred to last week.0 -
Extra layer of objectivity is helpfulcarly burn said:Why are they asking BDT & MSD Partners to look for them?
Surely Friedman's Canyon partners would do it for diddly??1 -
20% for £20m means we're worth a minimum of £100m? That blows my mind tbh, unless they're more along with looking to buy The Valley etc than they let on
0 -
What did Jones hint?
0 -
Sponsored links:
-
I would imagine 'give us 20m for 20% so we can offset it against our loss's would be a pretty hard sell.
I dont see this as anything sinister and hopefully it is an attempt to bring in some funds to ether make serious steps towards buying the ground or further squad investent.1 -
This could either mean the owners are so desperate to progress the club that they are doing any means necessary to get as much money into the club as possible. Alternatively means they either don’t want to or don’t have the required funds necessary to take us forward and need additional help. Annoying thing is have no idea which extreme it is0
-
What about:
Nathan says to the owners 'In order to stay up I need a credible amount of money in January'. Owners say 'We don't actually have the money ourselves, but we will try to raise some by doing a bit of creative valuation, you never know, it might work'.0 -
Because hedge funds aren't the same as merchant banks. They will have vastly different areas of expertise.carly burn said:Why are they asking BDT & MSD Partners to look for them?
Surely Friedman's Canyon partners would do it for diddly??4 -
I'm surprised that people read one very obscure and limited tweet and immediately assume this is a good thing. Why's that?
If this is the company issuing £20 mill of new shares and the cash is going to be used towards the business then fair enough. But if it's the current owners selling some of their own shares for £20 mill then I can't see how that automatically benefits us.4 -
In a good or bad way?AFKABartram said:Been expecting this0 -
Not sure they will have enough money raised to buy Charlton Life !AFKABartram said:Been expecting this4 -
Didn't Richard Murray do something similar when we were on the rise? I've no idea, but i'd agree with those who think this is about raising some funds / spreading the burden in order to invest again in the squad. I doubt its anything to do with buying the ground and righly so atm - all focus should be on ensuring we don't end up back in League 1 - that would be tragic.4
-
I’m sure people/ doom and gloom club,will suggest I’m being naive, but don’t see these owners having any bad intentions, so read it as something that potentially pushes the club forward, certainly not backwards.5
-
Two points - the market in football clubs, particularly English ones, moves as well as the status of a club. Secondly, this has always been a speculative business venture in which the investors will look to safeguard and recoup their investment when the opportunity arises. This doesn’t mean that their agenda can’t be aligned with ours as fans at any given time, but they are not primarily involved because they want to own a club for the fun of it, even if they do enjoy that. Equally they are wealthy enough to take the gamble in the first place.The original widespread assumption was that they wanted to flip the club for profit. I don’t think that all needs to happen at once for that to be correct. This looks like good business for the owners if they can do it. The club needs further investment, whether we stay up or not, so whether you see it as repayment or funds for that it makes sense.10


















