Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Pubs, and the demise of.
Comments
-
👍🏻ElfsborgAddick said:TelMc32 said:
@guinnessaddick’s pint is most definitely not from spoons!! 😉ElfsborgAddick said:guinnessaddick said:
£4 more a pint, I currently pay for a pre match pint.Curb_It said:We all love to see a new pub opening. We popped in to the Ship in Greenwich. It’s a stunning pub. Owned by the same owner of the Trafalgar. Frank the Yank I believe.. We popped in during Christmas and Tavern said it’s alright because it’s 6.50 a pint.
Walked back to Greenwich today and ordered two pints of Brixton lager. Tav came back moaning about the 16.40 for two pints. I was a bit clever and looked up the prices. We had two Cruzcampos when it was my round!8.60 for a Guinness!! Come on…
I can’t do the screen shot!Whilst I am back in March the Spoons will be seeing a lot of me.The objective is to not have to pay £7 a pint.
Another pub snob then
1 -
Elf when you’re back mate, let me know where you’re gonna be for a beer one evening.ElfsborgAddick said:guinnessaddick said:
£4 more a pint, I currently pay for a pre match pint.Curb_It said:We all love to see a new pub opening. We popped in to the Ship in Greenwich. It’s a stunning pub. Owned by the same owner of the Trafalgar. Frank the Yank I believe.. We popped in during Christmas and Tavern said it’s alright because it’s 6.50 a pint.
Walked back to Greenwich today and ordered two pints of Brixton lager. Tav came back moaning about the 16.40 for two pints. I was a bit clever and looked up the prices. We had two Cruzcampos when it was my round!8.60 for a Guinness!! Come on…
I can’t do the screen shot!Whilst I am back in March the Spoons will be seeing a lot of me.The objective is to not have to pay £7 a pint.I’ll go somewhere else :-)14 -
Not sure if already mentioned but Weatherspoons opening in Alicante airport next month.2
-
Have a pint in the cockpit too. Fantastic pub4
-
Next time!1
-
Sponsored links:
-
Bars close and hundreds lose jobs as US firm buys Brewdog in £33m deal
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c05v0p1d0peo0 -
The self styled brewing “punks” turned out to be just John Lydon in the end!clive said:Bars close and hundreds lose jobs as US firm buys Brewdog in £33m deal
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c05v0p1d0peo3 -
Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
More broadly, independent brewers in the UK face real market access problems: many pubs are tied to large brewers or pub groups, which limits shelf and tap space for smaller producers and makes survival harder. Industry groups and reports have warned this is squeezing independents1 -
Radostanradical said:Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
The major brewerys have a cartel on the market whixh will drive out independents who dont play the game.
You'll be a regular in a spoons eventually mate.
4 -
Sounds horrific, Wetherspoons clientele on their way back from Alicantemistrollingin62 said:Not sure if already mentioned but Weatherspoons opening in Alicante airport next month.
3 -
That’s a very simplistic view and, if that really was their model to be profitable, a very naive business plan. The brewers with pub chains stock/sell their own beers/drinks and don’t give up space to promote and make profits for other brewers. Brewdog certainly don’t stock other brewers drinks, but they do have their products in most supermarkets to boost sales. They overextended themselves, sold out to PE and had a co-founder who fell from grace quite spectacularly and dumped on his own “ethos”.Radostanradical said:Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
The major brewerys have a cartel on the market whixh will drive out independents who dont play the game.4 -
Radostanradical said:Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
The major brewerys have a cartel on the market whixh will drive out independents who dont play the game.TelMc32 said:
That’s a very simplistic view and, if that really was their model to be profitable, a very naive business plan. The brewers with pub chains stock/sell their own beers/drinks and don’t give up space to promote and make profits for other brewers. Brewdog certainly don’t stock other brewers drinks, but they do have their products in most supermarkets to boost sales. They overextended themselves, sold out to PE and had a co-founder who fell from grace quite spectacularly and dumped on his own “ethos”.Radostanradical said:Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
The major brewerys have a cartel on the market whixh will drive out independents who dont play the game.Brewdog founder admits 'many mistakes' as hundreds lose jobs in sale
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cze00ddyw27o3 -
It seems like this was the ultimate "equity punk investment".
People invested their money and the company effectively stuck up two fingers and they got no return. Punk lives!
1 -
Brewdog definitely have beers from other brewers on tap in their pubs.TelMc32 said:
That’s a very simplistic view and, if that really was their model to be profitable, a very naive business plan. The brewers with pub chains stock/sell their own beers/drinks and don’t give up space to promote and make profits for other brewers. Brewdog certainly don’t stock other brewers drinks, but they do have their products in most supermarkets to boost sales. They overextended themselves, sold out to PE and had a co-founder who fell from grace quite spectacularly and dumped on his own “ethos”.Radostanradical said:Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
The major brewerys have a cartel on the market whixh will drive out independents who dont play the game.1 -
Looking forward to a Punk IPA in the South spoons next Friday.se9addick said:
Brewdog definitely have beers from other brewers on tap in their pubs.TelMc32 said:
That’s a very simplistic view and, if that really was their model to be profitable, a very naive business plan. The brewers with pub chains stock/sell their own beers/drinks and don’t give up space to promote and make profits for other brewers. Brewdog certainly don’t stock other brewers drinks, but they do have their products in most supermarkets to boost sales. They overextended themselves, sold out to PE and had a co-founder who fell from grace quite spectacularly and dumped on his own “ethos”.Radostanradical said:Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
The major brewerys have a cartel on the market whixh will drive out independents who dont play the game.
Not had a proper beer for 18 months. :'(1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Barman refused us further service at Brewdog Canary Wharf after a pal (and former poster on here) casually wandered back from the khazis and eagerly informed about the massive log he’d just said goodbye to, so sod em4
-
No Feelings for the investorsOff_it said:It seems like this was the ultimate "equity punk investment".
People invested their money and the company effectively stuck up two fingers and they got no return. Punk lives!2 -
Sorry…I’ll clarify. They don’t sell beers made by the mainstream breweries who own pub chains. That seemed to be the point being made previously not being able to get their beers in “ordinary pubs” owned by those big breweries.se9addick said:
Brewdog definitely have beers from other brewers on tap in their pubs.TelMc32 said:
That’s a very simplistic view and, if that really was their model to be profitable, a very naive business plan. The brewers with pub chains stock/sell their own beers/drinks and don’t give up space to promote and make profits for other brewers. Brewdog certainly don’t stock other brewers drinks, but they do have their products in most supermarkets to boost sales. They overextended themselves, sold out to PE and had a co-founder who fell from grace quite spectacularly and dumped on his own “ethos”.Radostanradical said:Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
The major brewerys have a cartel on the market whixh will drive out independents who dont play the game.0 -
Reminds me of my Charlton shares.Off_it said:It seems like this was the ultimate "equity punk investment".
People invested their money and the company effectively stuck up two fingers and they got no return. Punk lives!1 -
Its not a simplistic view, its literally fact you can research yourself. Admittedly they were somewhat naive but they set out with the best of intentions but thats part of the issue when ypu put yourself on a pedestal, plenty of people will kick you when you make a mistake. Its worth noting that co-founder had nothing to do woth the decision to sell as he had already been ousted.TelMc32 said:
That’s a very simplistic view and, if that really was their model to be profitable, a very naive business plan. The brewers with pub chains stock/sell their own beers/drinks and don’t give up space to promote and make profits for other brewers. Brewdog certainly don’t stock other brewers drinks, but they do have their products in most supermarkets to boost sales. They overextended themselves, sold out to PE and had a co-founder who fell from grace quite spectacularly and dumped on his own “ethos”.Radostanradical said:Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
The major brewerys have a cartel on the market whixh will drive out independents who dont play the game.0 -
Quite a bold claim - if it were the case I'm pretty sure the CMA would have acted given the scale of the industry, but they haven't, and for a reason...Radostanradical said:Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
The major brewerys have a cartel on the market whixh will drive out independents who dont play the game.
0 -
Just over half the pubs in the UK (24,500) are owned by pub companies/breweries - including Brewdog themselves remember. That’s who Brewdog were trying to get to sell their beers. The competition. You’re essentially asking the Charlton club shop to move some of their stock out and sell Millwall stuff…and then give them the profits for the privilege of doing so 🤦🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️Radostanradical said:
It’s not a simplistic view, it’s literally fact you can research yourself. Admittedly they were somewhat naive but they set out with the best of intentions but thats part of the issue when ypu put yourself on a pedestal, plenty of people will kick you when you make a mistake. It’s worth noting that co-founder had nothing to do woth the decision to sell as he had already been ousted.TelMc32 said:
That’s a very simplistic view and, if that really was their model to be profitable, a very naive business plan. The brewers with pub chains stock/sell their own beers/drinks and don’t give up space to promote and make profits for other brewers. Brewdog certainly don’t stock other brewers drinks, but they do have their products in most supermarkets to boost sales. They overextended themselves, sold out to PE and had a co-founder who fell from grace quite spectacularly and dumped on his own “ethos”.Radostanradical said:Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
The major brewerys have a cartel on the market whixh will drive out independents who dont play the game.There are 21,500 Free Houses, but then you’re essentially trying to do trade deals with individual pubs.My family have owned pubs in Ireland and managed them here. Very different models, but if Brewdog were really trying to prop up their business by getting other “tied” pubs to sell their beers for them, it was never going to work.As for the co-owner, he was still a 22% shareholder (TSG 23% and the other co-owner Dickie at 21%). TSG pushed for the sale, but needed the co-owners to agree to it as the “punk investors” certainly wouldn’t vote for it. James Watt did well enough from the original PE deal, sharing £100m with Dickie. The Covid years and then the revelations about his behaviour and how he treated his staff ended up creating a toxic atmosphere and a broken business.4 -
CMA silence ≠ innocence — the regulator prosecutes proven collusion; the real issue is structural market power and tied‑pub barriers that squeeze independents, and those problems are well documented. I’ll hold my hands up: calling it a cartel was wrong, since that implies illegality. There are, however, clear structural inequalities in the industry that make it incredibly hard for independents to survive, let alone thriveSporadicAddick said:
Quite a bold claim - if it were the case I'm pretty sure the CMA would have acted given the scale of the industry, but they haven't, and for a reason...Radostanradical said:Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
The major brewerys have a cartel on the market whixh will drive out independents who dont play the game.0 -
Nice confident stat‑drop, pity it collapses if you check the definitions. The UK pub estate isn’t a single, neat number; depending on the dataset you pick it’s roughly 29,000 businesses (business registers) up to ~38,600 outlets for England and Wales in recent counts, so throwing around precise shares without defining your terms is meaningless.TelMc32 said:
Just over half the pubs in the UK (24,500) are owned by pub companies/breweries - including Brewdog themselves remember. That’s who Brewdog were trying to get to sell their beers. The competition. You’re essentially asking the Charlton club shop to move some of their stock out and sell Millwall stuff…and then give them the profits for the privilege of doing so 🤦🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️Radostanradical said:
It’s not a simplistic view, it’s literally fact you can research yourself. Admittedly they were somewhat naive but they set out with the best of intentions but thats part of the issue when ypu put yourself on a pedestal, plenty of people will kick you when you make a mistake. It’s worth noting that co-founder had nothing to do woth the decision to sell as he had already been ousted.TelMc32 said:
That’s a very simplistic view and, if that really was their model to be profitable, a very naive business plan. The brewers with pub chains stock/sell their own beers/drinks and don’t give up space to promote and make profits for other brewers. Brewdog certainly don’t stock other brewers drinks, but they do have their products in most supermarkets to boost sales. They overextended themselves, sold out to PE and had a co-founder who fell from grace quite spectacularly and dumped on his own “ethos”.Radostanradical said:Happy to educate some of my fellow lifers and followers on the situation with Brewdog.
Its very easy to throw barbs (and with the threshold being pretty low on here some may consider them witty) at the brewery without full context.
They were persured for quite a while by the large international drinks companies for some time for a purchase but tried as hard as they could to stay true to their ethos. What hasnt been reported about is the fact that they were being squeezed out of the putting their goods in regular pubs by those same organisations when they wouldnt sell.
So in laymans terms -
Pub A has a deal with a brewery owned by a massive organisation.
Brewdog asks pub A to stock their drink, pub A refuses or offers incredibly unfair terms for stocking.
Price of brewdog drops as a company.
The major brewerys have a cartel on the market whixh will drive out independents who dont play the game.There are 21,500 Free Houses, but then you’re essentially trying to do trade deals with individual pubs.My family have owned pubs in Ireland and managed them here. Very different models, but if Brewdog were really trying to prop up their business by getting other “tied” pubs to sell their beers for them, it was never going to work.As for the co-owner, he was still a 22% shareholder (TSG 23% and the other co-owner Dickie at 21%). TSG pushed for the sale, but needed the co-owners to agree to it as the “punk investors” certainly wouldn’t vote for it. James Watt did well enough from the original PE deal, sharing £100m with Dickie. The Covid years and then the revelations about his behaviour and how he treated his staff ended up creating a toxic atmosphere and a broken business.“Just over half” being tied and “21,500 free houses” are headline‑friendly but hinge on how you count pubs, outlets, and regulated pub‑owning businesses — different sources use different definitions, so those round numbers aren’t a slam‑dunk refutation.Owning a pub estate (yes, some groups own lots of sites) doesn’t magically make national distribution trivial; central buying power, keg lines, equipment deals and negotiated supplier terms mean access is not the same as legal ownership.So the “Charlton shop selling Millwall shirts” analogy is cute but lazy — it ignores scale economics, distribution logistics and commercial terms that favour big operators.If you want to win the argument, don’t wave unverified percentages around like facts; cite the dataset, explain the definitions, and then we can have a proper debate.3 -
Well the numbers come from the CAMRA piece below, quoting from The British Beer & Pub Association official stats. Admittedly, they relate to 2024 so numbers have probably dropped even if just looking at this thread. The second link is a potted history of the pub company model. You’re quite right, as statisticians have proven for years, you can count things in many different ways to prove (or disprove) your point.
https://learn.camra.org.uk/courses/pub-companies-part-3-pub-operating-models
5







