Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Latest Films

1…295296297298299301»

Comments

  • king addick
    king addick Posts: 3,957
    I personally really enjoyed Sinners. The KKK were prominent so vampires or not, at least its accurate for the time. 
    Jack O'Connell is really coming on leaps and bounds. Sinners and 28 years later shows how good he is.

    Next on my list is "I Swear" glowing reviews all over so be silly not to give it a look.
  • stoneroses19
    stoneroses19 Posts: 7,551
    king addick said:
    I personally really enjoyed Sinners. The KKK were prominent so vampires or not, at least its accurate for the time. 
    Jack O'Connell is really coming on leaps and bounds. Sinners and 28 years later shows how good he is.

    Next on my list is "I Swear" glowing reviews all over so be silly not to give it a look.
    Just waiting for the year he picks up all the major awards. Phenomenal talent. 
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 34,516
    stoneroses19 said:
    king addick said:
    I personally really enjoyed Sinners. The KKK were prominent so vampires or not, at least its accurate for the time. 
    Jack O'Connell is really coming on leaps and bounds. Sinners and 28 years later shows how good he is.

    Next on my list is "I Swear" glowing reviews all over so be silly not to give it a look.
    Just waiting for the year he picks up all the major awards. Phenomenal talent. 
    It will happen 
  • AddicksAddict
    AddicksAddict Posts: 16,186
    The Bride. It’s a mess but a fun mess with a few Easter eggs including one for Young Frankenstein, and a not particularly subtle but not unwelcome feminist, #metoo, overtone. 
  • Making_all_the_noise
    Making_all_the_noise Posts: 244
    How to make a killing - a modern, strangely dull remaking of one of the all time great films in “Of Kind Hearts and Coronets”. 

    Glenn Powell is mediocre and Margaret Queeley’s performance starts on a high before progressively tailing off into something unconvincing. Even a small twist at the end does little to shock or recover any credit because the performances are all so flat and the plot so repetitively turgid that you don’t care for any character. 

    Generously I’d call it watchable but very uninspiring. 
  • ken_shabby
    ken_shabby Posts: 6,495
    Carter said:
    I too have recently watched Nuremberg

    Russel Crowe was brilliant, Remi Malek less so and I couldn't help but think his flouncing was unnecessarily overly dramatic. Leo Woodall was class, good actor that kid 

    Like a lot of blokes in their 40s I've got an unhealthy interest in the second world war and the events of the Nuremberg trials and the behaviour of Göering in particular. 

    My missus lost interest about halfway in, I was there at the end. Solid 7/10 
    Thought it was fantastic. Thoroughly absorbing, and found it historically interesting and at the same time griping. I'd happily give it 8.5 out of 10. Said earlier a lot of us are fascinated by this period, and this was great. If I was going to pick holes, I thought some of the speech felt more like 2025 than 1945. As a balance, Russel Crowe was immense.
  • Mendonca In Asdas
    Mendonca In Asdas Posts: 22,888
    Not seen Nuremberg, yet, good to hear some reviews.
  • valleynick66
    valleynick66 Posts: 5,284
    Peaky Blinders film - albeit on Netflix. 

    Ok but underwhelming for me. It’s run its course now for storylines I think. 
  • hoof_it_up_to_benty
    hoof_it_up_to_benty Posts: 22,838
    valleynick66 said:
    Peaky Blinders film - albeit on Netflix. 

    Ok but underwhelming for me. It’s run its course now for storylines I think. 
    Thought it was very disappointing and a bit contrived. Without a lot of the best characters it was just a bit lost.

    Not a great storyline.

Categories

“Marketplace”