Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

James Bree - going back to Southampton on Monday according to their manager (p16)

1131415161719»

Comments

  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 35,718
    Will be a quiz question in the future..   .

    "What player got knocked out of the FA Cup at the 3rd round stage but still played in the semi final"
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 27,517
    Will be a quiz question in the future..   .

    "What player got knocked out of the FA Cup at the 3rd round stage but still played in the semi final"
    Could be better if it becomes who got knocked out by Chelsea before knocking Chelsea out 
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 29,988
    Will be a quiz question in the future..   .

    "What player got knocked out of the FA Cup at the 3rd round stage but still played in the semi final"

    Marc Guehi

  • _uptheaddicks
    _uptheaddicks Posts: 321
    Another assist for Bree while his replacement fancies booting the ball over the goal for fun!

    Productivity in points, matters.
  • paulsturgess
    paulsturgess Posts: 4,286
    What happened to the old rule of being cup
    tied?
  • AberystwythAddick
    AberystwythAddick Posts: 1,473
    He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong 
  • Simonsen
    Simonsen Posts: 5,645
    Some fans don't understand the concept of "form" 

    Bree went out of form but now he looks to have rediscovered his mojo. It was a good loan for him, Southampton and Charlton. Everybody gained out of it.

    Good luck to him and to Southampton. They've been the best watch I've had this season...even if it was at our considerable expense. 
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 38,764
    He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong 
    Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.

    I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 71,704
    edited April 5
    Scoham said:
    He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong 
    Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.

    I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
    Bree is a very capable rwb as well, as his attacking and crossing is good. 

    Amusingly he could face Chelsea for 2 different clubs in the FA Cup this season, which would be a nice quiz question. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • RC_CAFC
    RC_CAFC Posts: 1,909
    The funny thing with Bree was that it was his set pieces that seemed to fall off a cliff.

    He was excellent for a spell with us and has been excellent since returning to Southampton.

    I hope Southampton do go up because I think they’ll be more chance he signs for us in the summer. He obviously likes to be wanted.
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 38,764
    Scoham said:
    He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong 
    Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.

    I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
    Bree is a very capable rwb as well, as his attacking and crossing is good. 

    Amusingly he could face Chelsea for 2 different clubs in the FA Cup this season, which would be a nice quiz question. 
    His crossing is good, but he didn't add pace or anything that made him unpredictable, him coming in for Apter made us an even blander, slower team.

    It was fine when it worked, but we could be so poor going forward when it didn't.
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 1,849
    Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong 
    Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.

    I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
    Bree is a very capable rwb as well, as his attacking and crossing is good. 

    Amusingly he could face Chelsea for 2 different clubs in the FA Cup this season, which would be a nice quiz question. 
    His crossing is good, but he didn't add pace or anything that made him unpredictable, him coming in for Apter made us an even blander, slower team.

    It was fine when it worked, but we could be so poor going forward when it didn't.
    For me it’s a problem when fans want to  prioritise aesthetics over results. 

    Bree is far better than people make him out to be but because he’s a boring player he gets put down. 

    I think the sheer entitlement that some think we’re above a player with 250+ champ games half a season in the prem, as a newly promoted side is very dangerous 
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 38,764
    Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong 
    Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.

    I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
    Bree is a very capable rwb as well, as his attacking and crossing is good. 

    Amusingly he could face Chelsea for 2 different clubs in the FA Cup this season, which would be a nice quiz question. 
    His crossing is good, but he didn't add pace or anything that made him unpredictable, him coming in for Apter made us an even blander, slower team.

    It was fine when it worked, but we could be so poor going forward when it didn't.
    For me it’s a problem when fans want to  prioritise aesthetics over results. 

    Bree is far better than people make him out to be but because he’s a boring player he gets put down. 

    I think the sheer entitlement that some think we’re above a player with 250+ champ games half a season in the prem, as a newly promoted side is very dangerous 
    That’s not what I’m saying. It’s about the balance of the team and seeing the downsides of all players, including in good ones.

    We went on the run that got us promoted last season once we had TC drifting left and Small on the right. They were young, frustrating and often lacked end product, but their pace and ball carrying added width, created space and made us far less predictable and more difficult to defend against.

    We’ve had the same problem at times this season and it often means we’re very limited going forward.

    Bree signing permanently could be a big positive, but less so if we go with Edwards (or a similar) on the left and don’t add pace and skill in midfield and/or up front.

    Having 11 boring players wouldn’t make an effective team, and neither would having 4 or 5 pacey flair players in the starting 11.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,724
    Simonsen said:
    Some fans don't understand the concept of "form" 

    Bree went out of form but now he looks to have rediscovered his mojo. It was a good loan for him, Southampton and Charlton. Everybody gained out of it.

    Good luck to him and to Southampton. They've been the best watch I've had this season...even if it was at our considerable expense. 
    They were frighteningly good in the first half v us (admittedly we were not great). If they could play that way on the regs they would have won the Championship comfortably this season. 
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 23,534
    Simonsen said:
    Some fans don't understand the concept of "form" 

    Bree went out of form but now he looks to have rediscovered his mojo. It was a good loan for him, Southampton and Charlton. Everybody gained out of it.

    Good luck to him and to Southampton. They've been the best watch I've had this season...even if it was at our considerable expense. 
    And wasn't he carrying an injury when he dropped off a bit?
  • SteveACS
    SteveACS Posts: 485
    I admit to preferring Clarke

    When Ewards is back, long throws from both sides of the pitch.

    Without ending up with a full back wildly out of position if the opposition counter attack, as the RB is taking a throw-in from the left, or visa versa...
  • Rylo
    Rylo Posts: 883
    After what Simon Francis ended up doing with his career, I’ll never write another defender off again! Bree is one of those players that could probably end up holding their own in the Premier League with a bit of confidence. 
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 5,434
    Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong 
    Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.

    I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
    Bree is a very capable rwb as well, as his attacking and crossing is good. 

    Amusingly he could face Chelsea for 2 different clubs in the FA Cup this season, which would be a nice quiz question. 
    His crossing is good, but he didn't add pace or anything that made him unpredictable, him coming in for Apter made us an even blander, slower team.

    It was fine when it worked, but we could be so poor going forward when it didn't.
    For me it’s a problem when fans want to  prioritise aesthetics over results. 

    Bree is far better than people make him out to be but because he’s a boring player he gets put down. 

    I think the sheer entitlement that some think we’re above a player with 250+ champ games half a season in the prem, as a newly promoted side is very dangerous 
    That’s not what I’m saying. It’s about the balance of the team and seeing the downsides of all players, including in good ones.

    We went on the run that got us promoted last season once we had TC drifting left and Small on the right. They were young, frustrating and often lacked end product, but their pace and ball carrying added width, created space and made us far less predictable and more difficult to defend against.

    We’ve had the same problem at times this season and it often means we’re very limited going forward.

    Bree signing permanently could be a big positive, but less so if we go with Edwards (or a similar) on the left and don’t add pace and skill in midfield and/or up front.

    Having 11 boring players wouldn’t make an effective team, and neither would having 4 or 5 pacey flair players in the starting 11.
    When Bree was fully fit we probably played our best football of the season with him and TC on either flank when we were attacking

    Ideally we can add a pacey wing back that’s good 1v1 going forward and can also defend. Finding that player is going to be very difficult though, a player with all of those attributes is not going to be cheap. I think Asiimwe could be that player but next season might be one year too soon for him at championship level 
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 27,548
    RC_CAFC said:
    The funny thing with Bree was that it was his set pieces that seemed to fall off a cliff.

    He was excellent for a spell with us and has been excellent since returning to Southampton.

    I hope Southampton do go up because I think they’ll be more chance he signs for us in the summer. He obviously likes to be wanted.
    took a decent corner for Southampton on the weekend. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 29,183
    Took a dreadful free kick in the Wrexham game that ended up leading to a goal anyway due to the way it bobbled around the box, that you might almost have been convinced it was deliberate.
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 1,849
    NabySarr said:
    Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    Scoham said:
    He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong 
    Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.

    I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
    Bree is a very capable rwb as well, as his attacking and crossing is good. 

    Amusingly he could face Chelsea for 2 different clubs in the FA Cup this season, which would be a nice quiz question. 
    His crossing is good, but he didn't add pace or anything that made him unpredictable, him coming in for Apter made us an even blander, slower team.

    It was fine when it worked, but we could be so poor going forward when it didn't.
    For me it’s a problem when fans want to  prioritise aesthetics over results. 

    Bree is far better than people make him out to be but because he’s a boring player he gets put down. 

    I think the sheer entitlement that some think we’re above a player with 250+ champ games half a season in the prem, as a newly promoted side is very dangerous 
    That’s not what I’m saying. It’s about the balance of the team and seeing the downsides of all players, including in good ones.

    We went on the run that got us promoted last season once we had TC drifting left and Small on the right. They were young, frustrating and often lacked end product, but their pace and ball carrying added width, created space and made us far less predictable and more difficult to defend against.

    We’ve had the same problem at times this season and it often means we’re very limited going forward.

    Bree signing permanently could be a big positive, but less so if we go with Edwards (or a similar) on the left and don’t add pace and skill in midfield and/or up front.

    Having 11 boring players wouldn’t make an effective team, and neither would having 4 or 5 pacey flair players in the starting 11.
    When Bree was fully fit we probably played our best football of the season with him and TC on either flank when we were attacking

    Ideally we can add a pacey wing back that’s good 1v1 going forward and can also defend. Finding that player is going to be very difficult though, a player with all of those attributes is not going to be cheap. I think Asiimwe could be that player but next season might be one year too soon for him at championship level 
    Don’t want to write him off but for an average Wimbledon he’s started 2 of their last 19 league games and before his age is used as an excuse an 18 yr old has been favoured over him in recent games  
  • aso914
    aso914 Posts: 385
    I wonder if southampton offers him a new contract if they get promoted. 
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 23,534
    edited April 7
    aso914 said:
    I wonder if southampton offers him a new contract if they get promoted. 
    I don't think they would.

    Think they will if they don't go down though.
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 1,849
    Started 15 in a row for Southampton even if they get promoted wouldn’t be shocked to offer him a new contract as a squad player even if they don’t offer him improved terms 
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 25,325
    I’d still take Clarke over Bree