Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
James Bree - going back to Southampton on Monday according to their manager (p16)
Comments
-
Will be a quiz question in the future.. .
"What player got knocked out of the FA Cup at the 3rd round stage but still played in the semi final"12 -
Could be better if it becomes who got knocked out by Chelsea before knocking Chelsea outgolfaddick said:Will be a quiz question in the future.. .
"What player got knocked out of the FA Cup at the 3rd round stage but still played in the semi final"16 -
golfaddick said:Will be a quiz question in the future.. .
"What player got knocked out of the FA Cup at the 3rd round stage but still played in the semi final"Marc Guehi
13 -
Another assist for Bree while his replacement fancies booting the ball over the goal for fun!
Productivity in points, matters.1 -
What happened to the old rule of being cup
tied?1 -
it changedpaulsturgess said:What happened to the old rule of being cup
tied?
https://www.fourfourtwo.com/competition/explained-why-players-can-represent-two-different-clubs-in-fa-cup-this-season-and-how-it-could-benefit-manchester-city1 -
He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong12
-
Some fans don't understand the concept of "form"
Bree went out of form but now he looks to have rediscovered his mojo. It was a good loan for him, Southampton and Charlton. Everybody gained out of it.
Good luck to him and to Southampton. They've been the best watch I've had this season...even if it was at our considerable expense.12 -
Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.AberystwythAddick said:He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong
I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
7 -
Bree is a very capable rwb as well, as his attacking and crossing is good.Scoham said:
Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.AberystwythAddick said:He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong
I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
Amusingly he could face Chelsea for 2 different clubs in the FA Cup this season, which would be a nice quiz question.2 -
Sponsored links:
-
The funny thing with Bree was that it was his set pieces that seemed to fall off a cliff.
He was excellent for a spell with us and has been excellent since returning to Southampton.
I hope Southampton do go up because I think they’ll be more chance he signs for us in the summer. He obviously likes to be wanted.3 -
His crossing is good, but he didn't add pace or anything that made him unpredictable, him coming in for Apter made us an even blander, slower team.killerandflash said:
Bree is a very capable rwb as well, as his attacking and crossing is good.Scoham said:
Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.AberystwythAddick said:He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong
I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
Amusingly he could face Chelsea for 2 different clubs in the FA Cup this season, which would be a nice quiz question.
It was fine when it worked, but we could be so poor going forward when it didn't.2 -
For me it’s a problem when fans want to prioritise aesthetics over results.Scoham said:
His crossing is good, but he didn't add pace or anything that made him unpredictable, him coming in for Apter made us an even blander, slower team.killerandflash said:
Bree is a very capable rwb as well, as his attacking and crossing is good.Scoham said:
Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.AberystwythAddick said:He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong
I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
Amusingly he could face Chelsea for 2 different clubs in the FA Cup this season, which would be a nice quiz question.
It was fine when it worked, but we could be so poor going forward when it didn't.Bree is far better than people make him out to be but because he’s a boring player he gets put down.I think the sheer entitlement that some think we’re above a player with 250+ champ games half a season in the prem, as a newly promoted side is very dangerous7 -
That’s not what I’m saying. It’s about the balance of the team and seeing the downsides of all players, including in good ones.Crispywood said:
For me it’s a problem when fans want to prioritise aesthetics over results.Scoham said:
His crossing is good, but he didn't add pace or anything that made him unpredictable, him coming in for Apter made us an even blander, slower team.killerandflash said:
Bree is a very capable rwb as well, as his attacking and crossing is good.Scoham said:
Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.AberystwythAddick said:He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong
I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
Amusingly he could face Chelsea for 2 different clubs in the FA Cup this season, which would be a nice quiz question.
It was fine when it worked, but we could be so poor going forward when it didn't.Bree is far better than people make him out to be but because he’s a boring player he gets put down.I think the sheer entitlement that some think we’re above a player with 250+ champ games half a season in the prem, as a newly promoted side is very dangerous
We went on the run that got us promoted last season once we had TC drifting left and Small on the right. They were young, frustrating and often lacked end product, but their pace and ball carrying added width, created space and made us far less predictable and more difficult to defend against.
We’ve had the same problem at times this season and it often means we’re very limited going forward.
Bree signing permanently could be a big positive, but less so if we go with Edwards (or a similar) on the left and don’t add pace and skill in midfield and/or up front.
Having 11 boring players wouldn’t make an effective team, and neither would having 4 or 5 pacey flair players in the starting 11.5 -
They were frighteningly good in the first half v us (admittedly we were not great). If they could play that way on the regs they would have won the Championship comfortably this season.Simonsen said:Some fans don't understand the concept of "form"
Bree went out of form but now he looks to have rediscovered his mojo. It was a good loan for him, Southampton and Charlton. Everybody gained out of it.
Good luck to him and to Southampton. They've been the best watch I've had this season...even if it was at our considerable expense.0 -
And wasn't he carrying an injury when he dropped off a bit?Simonsen said:Some fans don't understand the concept of "form"
Bree went out of form but now he looks to have rediscovered his mojo. It was a good loan for him, Southampton and Charlton. Everybody gained out of it.
Good luck to him and to Southampton. They've been the best watch I've had this season...even if it was at our considerable expense.3 -
I admit to preferring Clarke
When Ewards is back, long throws from both sides of the pitch.
Without ending up with a full back wildly out of position if the opposition counter attack, as the RB is taking a throw-in from the left, or visa versa...1 -
After what Simon Francis ended up doing with his career, I’ll never write another defender off again! Bree is one of those players that could probably end up holding their own in the Premier League with a bit of confidence.4
-
When Bree was fully fit we probably played our best football of the season with him and TC on either flank when we were attackingScoham said:
That’s not what I’m saying. It’s about the balance of the team and seeing the downsides of all players, including in good ones.Crispywood said:
For me it’s a problem when fans want to prioritise aesthetics over results.Scoham said:
His crossing is good, but he didn't add pace or anything that made him unpredictable, him coming in for Apter made us an even blander, slower team.killerandflash said:
Bree is a very capable rwb as well, as his attacking and crossing is good.Scoham said:
Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.AberystwythAddick said:He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong
I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
Amusingly he could face Chelsea for 2 different clubs in the FA Cup this season, which would be a nice quiz question.
It was fine when it worked, but we could be so poor going forward when it didn't.Bree is far better than people make him out to be but because he’s a boring player he gets put down.I think the sheer entitlement that some think we’re above a player with 250+ champ games half a season in the prem, as a newly promoted side is very dangerous
We went on the run that got us promoted last season once we had TC drifting left and Small on the right. They were young, frustrating and often lacked end product, but their pace and ball carrying added width, created space and made us far less predictable and more difficult to defend against.
We’ve had the same problem at times this season and it often means we’re very limited going forward.
Bree signing permanently could be a big positive, but less so if we go with Edwards (or a similar) on the left and don’t add pace and skill in midfield and/or up front.
Having 11 boring players wouldn’t make an effective team, and neither would having 4 or 5 pacey flair players in the starting 11.
Ideally we can add a pacey wing back that’s good 1v1 going forward and can also defend. Finding that player is going to be very difficult though, a player with all of those attributes is not going to be cheap. I think Asiimwe could be that player but next season might be one year too soon for him at championship level1 -
took a decent corner for Southampton on the weekend.RC_CAFC said:The funny thing with Bree was that it was his set pieces that seemed to fall off a cliff.
He was excellent for a spell with us and has been excellent since returning to Southampton.
I hope Southampton do go up because I think they’ll be more chance he signs for us in the summer. He obviously likes to be wanted.1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Took a dreadful free kick in the Wrexham game that ended up leading to a goal anyway due to the way it bobbled around the box, that you might almost have been convinced it was deliberate.0
-
Don’t want to write him off but for an average Wimbledon he’s started 2 of their last 19 league games and before his age is used as an excuse an 18 yr old has been favoured over him in recent gamesNabySarr said:
When Bree was fully fit we probably played our best football of the season with him and TC on either flank when we were attackingScoham said:
That’s not what I’m saying. It’s about the balance of the team and seeing the downsides of all players, including in good ones.Crispywood said:
For me it’s a problem when fans want to prioritise aesthetics over results.Scoham said:
His crossing is good, but he didn't add pace or anything that made him unpredictable, him coming in for Apter made us an even blander, slower team.killerandflash said:
Bree is a very capable rwb as well, as his attacking and crossing is good.Scoham said:
Isn’t he playing as a RB rather than a RWB at Southampton, which I think suits him more. They’re also a better team than us, that means he gets on the ball more and has better teammates to link up with.AberystwythAddick said:He was always a good player and will have much better options than us if he does go for free in the summer. Some fans deluded themselves into thinking he wasn’t a good player. Glad he’s proved those people wrong
I don’t think there was ever doubt he’s Championship standard, but if we could choose an ideal RWB in our system I’d want them to have some strengths that Bree doesn’t offer.
Amusingly he could face Chelsea for 2 different clubs in the FA Cup this season, which would be a nice quiz question.
It was fine when it worked, but we could be so poor going forward when it didn't.Bree is far better than people make him out to be but because he’s a boring player he gets put down.I think the sheer entitlement that some think we’re above a player with 250+ champ games half a season in the prem, as a newly promoted side is very dangerous
We went on the run that got us promoted last season once we had TC drifting left and Small on the right. They were young, frustrating and often lacked end product, but their pace and ball carrying added width, created space and made us far less predictable and more difficult to defend against.
We’ve had the same problem at times this season and it often means we’re very limited going forward.
Bree signing permanently could be a big positive, but less so if we go with Edwards (or a similar) on the left and don’t add pace and skill in midfield and/or up front.
Having 11 boring players wouldn’t make an effective team, and neither would having 4 or 5 pacey flair players in the starting 11.
Ideally we can add a pacey wing back that’s good 1v1 going forward and can also defend. Finding that player is going to be very difficult though, a player with all of those attributes is not going to be cheap. I think Asiimwe could be that player but next season might be one year too soon for him at championship level3 -
I wonder if southampton offers him a new contract if they get promoted.0
-
I don't think they would.aso914 said:I wonder if southampton offers him a new contract if they get promoted.
Think they will if they don't go down though.1 -
Started 15 in a row for Southampton even if they get promoted wouldn’t be shocked to offer him a new contract as a squad player even if they don’t offer him improved terms0
-
I’d still take Clarke over Bree3









