Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

We need a clean sheet to win (updated with full table)

GoOnYouHaddocks
GoOnYouHaddocks Posts: 1,100
edited April 9 in General Charlton

I'm sure this has been discussed, but I was looking at some stats and the difference in our results when the opponent scores and when they don't is alarming.

Opponent Scores table.jpg

If we don't concede a goal, our wins, draws and losses is 11-2-0. When we do concede a goal we're 1-11-16. We've only won one game all season when the other team scores. Maybe we need a good sports psychologist?

EDIT: After some constructive comments and light-hearted piss-taking I've decided to add a full table. Doing a full statistical analysis is beyond me and I can't be asked to include what time the goals were scored. Thoughts?

Opponent Scores table 2b.jpg

Comments

  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,884
    And that was against the worst team in the history of this league 
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 1,730
    edited April 8

    I'm sure this has been discussed, but I was looking at some stats and the difference in our results when the opponent scores and when they don't is alarming.

    Opponent Scores tablejpg

    If we don't concede a goal, our wins, draws and losses is 11-2-0. When we do concede a goal we're 1-11-16. We've only won one game all season when the other team scores. Maybe we need a good sports psychologist?

    Sports psychologist ❌
    better midfielders ✅
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 14,184
    Leuth said:
    And that was against the worst team in the history of this league 
    We played 08/09 Charlton?
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 51,015
    It’s not sustainable 
  • SteveACS
    SteveACS Posts: 473
    You mean... we've never lost when we've not conceded???

    Who'd have thought it...
  • GoOnYouHaddocks
    GoOnYouHaddocks Posts: 1,100
    SteveACS said:
    You mean... we've never lost when we've not conceded???

    Who'd have thought it...
    Yeah, that one surprised me as well. I double checked the numbers, thinking that I must have made a mistake, but it's true!
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,645
    edited April 8
    I get the feeling that you are right GOYH and that we are a better team when the opposition doesn't score. Whether there is anything 'alarming' or not, cannot be told from the statistics you've provided though. All teams experience better results when the opposition doesn't score, that's the nature of football. Those stats need a bit more work before they become meaningful, either a breakdown of the statistical probabilities of any particular result happening or a comparison to how other teams perform. 
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 18,024
    I think changing the analysis to scoreing first vs conceding first would make it a bit more meaningful. 
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 48,098
    edited April 8
    We start games tight and if it is nil nil, invariably get a chance or two as the game develops and we sometimes take one.  I think we were better at stopping opponents creating chances at the start of the season but now we are more reliant on luck in terms of them. Which sometimes we get and sometimes we don't.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 65,999
    I wonder what this statistic would look like for Luton under NJ.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 65,999
    edited April 8
    I also wonder how we compare to the rest of the league on this metric. 

    The minimum number of goals a game needs to finish with both teams scoring and a winner is three. And the average goals per game this season is only 2.59.

    We’ve only done it once but I bet a lot of the league have only done it 2 or 3 times themselves.
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 29,276
    SteveACS said:
    You mean... we've never lost when we've not conceded???

    Who'd have thought it...
    Yeah, that one surprised me as well. I double checked the numbers, thinking that I must have made a mistake, but it's true!
    I was impressed that the goals against was "0" in those games. That's really impressive. 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 35,510

    I'm sure this has been discussed, but I was looking at some stats and the difference in our results when the opponent scores and when they don't is alarming.

    Opponent Scores table.jpg

    If we don't concede a goal, our wins, draws and losses is 11-2-0. When we do concede a goal we're 1-11-16. We've only won one game all season when the other team scores. Maybe we need a good sports psychologist?

    I take it you're new around here.
  • MartinCAFC
    MartinCAFC Posts: 3,346
    This needs addressing for next season without doubt. While it's worked for us this season, the second season is always harder than the first season to stay up. No riding the wave of promotion, and we came up with the identity of keeping clean sheets which we carried into this season but has slowly been fading away with 2 clean sheets in our last 10 games. It's been great to enjoy but time to kick on in the summer.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,574

    I'm sure this has been discussed, but I was looking at some stats and the difference in our results when the opponent scores and when they don't is alarming.

    Opponent Scores table.jpg

    If we don't concede a goal, our wins, draws and losses is 11-2-0. When we do concede a goal we're 1-11-16. We've only won one game all season when the other team scores. Maybe we need a good sports psychologist?

    Do you have any statistics on the results of matches where we score more than the opposition? I've a feeling we tend to do pretty well in those matches. 
  • GoOnYouHaddocks
    GoOnYouHaddocks Posts: 1,100

    I'm sure this has been discussed, but I was looking at some stats and the difference in our results when the opponent scores and when they don't is alarming.

    Opponent Scores table.jpg

    If we don't concede a goal, our wins, draws and losses is 11-2-0. When we do concede a goal we're 1-11-16. We've only won one game all season when the other team scores. Maybe we need a good sports psychologist?

    I take it you're new around here.
    Joined about 15 years ago, so relatively new I suppose. I'm more of a lurker than a poster.
  • GoOnYouHaddocks
    GoOnYouHaddocks Posts: 1,100
    Chizz said:

    I'm sure this has been discussed, but I was looking at some stats and the difference in our results when the opponent scores and when they don't is alarming.

    Opponent Scores table.jpg

    If we don't concede a goal, our wins, draws and losses is 11-2-0. When we do concede a goal we're 1-11-16. We've only won one game all season when the other team scores. Maybe we need a good sports psychologist?

    Do you have any statistics on the results of matches where we score more than the opposition? I've a feeling we tend to do pretty well in those matches. 
    I'll get ChatGPT to help me with the analysis, but I'm guessing that you might be right.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,884
    I don't think all those tables are necessary. The only relevant one is 'games won when conceding', and that compared to every other club in this division. A shorthand for this comparison is games we've lost when scoring - games other clubs have won when conceding to us and our potent attack. There have been EIGHT of those so far in the league this season. 
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,884
    But also all this hilarious bants about how it's unsurprising how we do well in games where we score more than the opposition...that 1 vs 8 disparity IS significant imo, this is a good and meaningful observation by the threadstarter
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 35,510

    I'm sure this has been discussed, but I was looking at some stats and the difference in our results when the opponent scores and when they don't is alarming.

    Opponent Scores table.jpg

    If we don't concede a goal, our wins, draws and losses is 11-2-0. When we do concede a goal we're 1-11-16. We've only won one game all season when the other team scores. Maybe we need a good sports psychologist?

    I take it you're new around here.
    Joined about 15 years ago, so relatively new I suppose. I'm more of a lurker than a poster.
    15 years makes you an old timer, so I'm surprised that you didnt know our failings when we concede first.

    I'm not going to go into it again as it's well documented, but if you want to while away a few hours then look at the stats over the past 6 years for when we let in the first goal.



  • Sponsored links:



  • GoOnYouHaddocks
    GoOnYouHaddocks Posts: 1,100
    I also wonder how we compare to the rest of the league on this metric. 

    The minimum number of goals a game needs to finish with both teams scoring and a winner is three. And the average goals per game this season is only 2.59.

    We’ve only done it once but I bet a lot of the league have only done it 2 or 3 times themselves.
    I've added a full league table for comparison.
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,645
    I also wonder how we compare to the rest of the league on this metric. 

    The minimum number of goals a game needs to finish with both teams scoring and a winner is three. And the average goals per game this season is only 2.59.

    We’ve only done it once but I bet a lot of the league have only done it 2 or 3 times themselves.
    I've added a full league table for comparison.
    Thank you, that's more instructive. And the great news is we've got Sheffield Wednesday coming up.
  • I think those stats only highlight NJ’s plan for the season and that this was the successful strategy that kept us up (probably, still not mathematically there) despite having the third worst budget in the league. Why would you play expansive, attacking football when every other team apart from the two below you have more skilful, better paid players. It would be like entering a boxing ring with one hand tied behind your back. You need a different strategy to survive. We cannot compete with other teams in quality of strike force so instead we concentrate on defence and keeping clean sheets. If you don’t concede you have a chance of a draw or nicking a win. Yes, it makes it harder to win a game when you do concede but I believe this was all part of NJ’s strategy for survival when we’re so disadvantaged in this league. Expect more of the same next season as Carter has stated the player budget will only increase gradually to a mid table level in three years time.
  • GoOnYouHaddocks
    GoOnYouHaddocks Posts: 1,100
    I think those stats only highlight NJ’s plan for the season and that this was the successful strategy that kept us up (probably, still not mathematically there) despite having the third worst budget in the league. Why would you play expansive, attacking football when every other team apart from the two below you have more skilful, better paid players. It would be like entering a boxing ring with one hand tied behind your back. You need a different strategy to survive. We cannot compete with other teams in quality of strike force so instead we concentrate on defence and keeping clean sheets. If you don’t concede you have a chance of a draw or nicking a win. Yes, it makes it harder to win a game when you do concede but I believe this was all part of NJ’s strategy for survival when we’re so disadvantaged in this league. Expect more of the same next season as Carter has stated the player budget will only increase gradually to a mid table level in three years time.
    You might be on to something here.

    We've kept 13 clean sheets so far this season, which is 4th best in the league, only just behind Coventry (15), Millwall (15) and Ipswich (14).
  • jimmymelrose
    jimmymelrose Posts: 10,125

    I'm sure this has been discussed, but I was looking at some stats and the difference in our results when the opponent scores and when they don't is alarming.

    Opponent Scores table.jpg

    If we don't concede a goal, our wins, draws and losses is 11-2-0. When we do concede a goal we're 1-11-16. We've only won one game all season when the other team scores. Maybe we need a good sports psychologist?

    I take it you're new around here.
    Joined about 15 years ago, so relatively new I suppose. I'm more of a lurker than a poster.
    15 years makes you an old timer, so I'm surprised that you didnt know our failings when we concede first.

    I'm not going to go into it again as it's well documented, but if you want to while away a few hours then look at the stats over the past 6 years for when we let in the first goal.


    Can you post all those statistical charts that you have used as wallpaper in your flat please? 
  • jimmymelrose
    jimmymelrose Posts: 10,125
    Stig said:
    I also wonder how we compare to the rest of the league on this metric. 

    The minimum number of goals a game needs to finish with both teams scoring and a winner is three. And the average goals per game this season is only 2.59.

    We’ve only done it once but I bet a lot of the league have only done it 2 or 3 times themselves.
    I've added a full league table for comparison.
    Thank you, that's more instructive. And the great news is we've got Sheffield Wednesday coming up.
    Stonewall 0-0 draw
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,645
    Stig said:
    I also wonder how we compare to the rest of the league on this metric. 

    The minimum number of goals a game needs to finish with both teams scoring and a winner is three. And the average goals per game this season is only 2.59.

    We’ve only done it once but I bet a lot of the league have only done it 2 or 3 times themselves.
    I've added a full league table for comparison.
    Thank you, that's more instructive. And the great news is we've got Sheffield Wednesday coming up.
    Stonewall 0-0 draw
    That would be incredibly frustrating, but it would probably suit us ok in the end.