Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Jayden Fevrier Signs On Loan from Stockport County

1101112131416»

Comments

  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 6,042
    The fact he can play left and right wing back and higher up the pitch make him a perfect squad signing imo.

    I don’t think we should be making squad signings .  We need to improve the first team and I doubt there will be a lot of money kicking around unless we can sell MBick for the sam money that was being spoken about in January 
  • SteveACS
    SteveACS Posts: 491
    wmcf123 said:
    The fact he can play left and right wing back and higher up the pitch make him a perfect squad signing imo.

    I don’t think we should be making squad signings .  We need to improve the first team and I doubt there will be a lot of money kicking around unless we can sell MBick for the sam money that was being spoken about in January 
    Except, if there's isn't a lot of money around, we're going to struggle to be able to sign better!

    A better, as flexible, signing than Fevrier is liable to cost a lot of money!
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 6,042
    SteveACS said:
    wmcf123 said:
    The fact he can play left and right wing back and higher up the pitch make him a perfect squad signing imo.

    I don’t think we should be making squad signings .  We need to improve the first team and I doubt there will be a lot of money kicking around unless we can sell MBick for the sam money that was being spoken about in January 
    Except, if there's isn't a lot of money around, we're going to struggle to be able to sign better!

    A better, as flexible, signing than Fevrier is liable to cost a lot of money!
    I wouldn’t be signing anyone that’s going to play here and there .  Next season is going to be tough - the league is going to be stronger and our form since November has been largely poor .  We need to improve the playing 11.  
  • crookester
    crookester Posts: 1,526
    edited April 30
    wmcf123 said:
    SteveACS said:
    wmcf123 said:
    The fact he can play left and right wing back and higher up the pitch make him a perfect squad signing imo.

    I don’t think we should be making squad signings .  We need to improve the first team and I doubt there will be a lot of money kicking around unless we can sell MBick for the sam money that was being spoken about in January 
    Except, if there's isn't a lot of money around, we're going to struggle to be able to sign better!

    A better, as flexible, signing than Fevrier is liable to cost a lot of money!
    I wouldn’t be signing anyone that’s going to play here and there .  Next season is going to be tough - the league is going to be stronger and our form since November has been largely poor .  We need to improve the playing 11.  
    Yes but over the course of the season, those players will get injured or lose form. We also need subs that can come on and impact the game. We need to improve the squad, not just the first choice starting 11.
  • stoneroses19
    stoneroses19 Posts: 7,580
    He's got talent; just looks too bulky. His  running technique doesn’t do him any favours but if he dropped a bit of weight and had a proper sprint coach over the off season, I think he’d be substantially better. 
    Bizarre parts of his game to point out negatively. Nothing wrong with the way he runs and his current strength is a decent part of his game too. 
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 1,900
    He's got talent; just looks too bulky. His  running technique doesn’t do him any favours but if he dropped a bit of weight and had a proper sprint coach over the off season, I think he’d be substantially better. 
    Bizarre parts of his game to point out negatively. Nothing wrong with the way he runs and his current strength is a decent part of his game too. 
    If this man had a better running style, he could have become a decent athlete.
    If anyone earned the right to wear gold shoes it was this guy.



  • SteveACS
    SteveACS Posts: 491
    wmcf123 said:
    SteveACS said:
    wmcf123 said:
    The fact he can play left and right wing back and higher up the pitch make him a perfect squad signing imo.

    I don’t think we should be making squad signings .  We need to improve the first team and I doubt there will be a lot of money kicking around unless we can sell MBick for the sam money that was being spoken about in January 
    Except, if there's isn't a lot of money around, we're going to struggle to be able to sign better!

    A better, as flexible, signing than Fevrier is liable to cost a lot of money!
    I wouldn’t be signing anyone that’s going to play here and there .  Next season is going to be tough - the league is going to be stronger and our form since November has been largely poor .  We need to improve the playing 11.  
    So, you advocate we don't sign Fevrier...

    And what happens when our new right back gets crocked, and is out for the season?

    That doesn't happen, does it? Your season doesn't get disrupted by a season ending injury, does it?

    Oh! Wait! What happened to Josh Edwards again?
  • arthur
    arthur Posts: 266
    SteveACS said:
    wmcf123 said:
    SteveACS said:
    wmcf123 said:
    The fact he can play left and right wing back and higher up the pitch make him a perfect squad signing imo.

    I don’t think we should be making squad signings .  We need to improve the first team and I doubt there will be a lot of money kicking around unless we can sell MBick for the sam money that was being spoken about in January 
    Except, if there's isn't a lot of money around, we're going to struggle to be able to sign better!

    A better, as flexible, signing than Fevrier is liable to cost a lot of money!
    I wouldn’t be signing anyone that’s going to play here and there .  Next season is going to be tough - the league is going to be stronger and our form since November has been largely poor .  We need to improve the playing 11.  
    So, you advocate we don't sign Fevrier...

    And what happens when our new right back gets crocked, and is out for the season?

    That doesn't happen, does it? Your season doesn't get disrupted by a season ending injury, does it?

    Oh! Wait! What happened to Josh Edwards again?
    It's obvious, at that point blame Jones for not getting good enough backup!
  • arny23394
    arny23394 Posts: 1,375
    Young, versatile, seemingly happy to be a squad player and cheap, which means we can allocate more funds towards some quality midfielders. We also know he can impact games at this level - not sure we could find all that without paying a lot more money. 
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 1,900
    arny23394 said:
    Young, versatile, seemingly happy to be a squad player and cheap, which means we can allocate more funds towards some quality midfielders. We also know he can impact games at this level - not sure we could find all that without paying a lot more money. 
    I think it's a no brainer, go and have a chat with Stockport before someone else nips in and signs him.

  • Sponsored links:



  • He's got talent; just looks too bulky. His  running technique doesn’t do him any favours but if he dropped a bit of weight and had a proper sprint coach over the off season, I think he’d be substantially better. 
    Bizarre parts of his game to point out negatively. Nothing wrong with the way he runs and his current strength is a decent part of his game too. 
    I probably could’ve framed this better. I like him as  a player and would def have him back next year. I think he’s got a higher ceiling and has weaknesses that are resolvable, probably over summer. Bulk is not the same as strength. Maybe sprint coaching is not common in football, but it is used extensively in rugby union to add pace and explosiveness.
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 4,435
    arny23394 said:
    Young, versatile, seemingly happy to be a squad player and cheap, which means we can allocate more funds towards some quality midfielders. We also know he can impact games at this level - not sure we could find all that without paying a lot more money. 
    I think it's a no brainer, go and have a chat with Stockport before someone else nips in and signs him.
    As Tyrece said to him: Sign dat ting!


    Some folk here talking about needing a stronger starting 11 not squad players, we discovered this season what happens when you do that, we lost a couple of key starters and the entire plan and results went to shit.
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 4,435
    He's got talent; just looks too bulky. His  running technique doesn’t do him any favours but if he dropped a bit of weight and had a proper sprint coach over the off season, I think he’d be substantially better. 
    Bizarre parts of his game to point out negatively. Nothing wrong with the way he runs and his current strength is a decent part of his game too. 
    I probably could’ve framed this better. I like him as  a player and would def have him back next year. I think he’s got a higher ceiling and has weaknesses that are resolvable, probably over summer. Bulk is not the same as strength. Maybe sprint coaching is not common in football, but it is used extensively in rugby union to add pace and explosiveness.
    Looked quick enough to me running the length of the pitch in the 93rd minute shrugs.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 18,344
    arny23394 said:
    Young, versatile, seemingly happy to be a squad player and cheap, which means we can allocate more funds towards some quality midfielders. We also know he can impact games at this level - not sure we could find all that without paying a lot more money. 
    I think it's a no brainer, go and have a chat with Stockport before someone else nips in and signs him.
    As Tyrece said to him: Sign dat ting!


    Some folk here talking about needing a stronger starting 11 not squad players, we discovered this season what happens when you do that, we lost a couple of key starters and the entire plan and results went to shit.
    What’s being lost in that discussion is that normally signing first team players makes your current starters the squad players. In the positions Fev plays we don’t have any starters to move down the pecking order so it’s imperative we sign a squad player in his mould at the very least
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 4,435
    fenaddick said:
    arny23394 said:
    Young, versatile, seemingly happy to be a squad player and cheap, which means we can allocate more funds towards some quality midfielders. We also know he can impact games at this level - not sure we could find all that without paying a lot more money. 
    I think it's a no brainer, go and have a chat with Stockport before someone else nips in and signs him.
    As Tyrece said to him: Sign dat ting!


    Some folk here talking about needing a stronger starting 11 not squad players, we discovered this season what happens when you do that, we lost a couple of key starters and the entire plan and results went to shit.
    What’s being lost in that discussion is that normally signing first team players makes your current starters the squad players. In the positions Fev plays we don’t have any starters to move down the pecking order so it’s imperative we sign a squad player in his mould at the very least
    I'll be happy if we don't have to continue the try everyone at LWB experiment.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 48,154
    Of course every potential squad player has the capacity to become more. Especially a young one!
  • YTS1978
    YTS1978 Posts: 1,777
    Im kinda on the fence here. Really didn't understand why we signed him tbh, then hardly played him. Thought he was a bit of a joke! But, hes showed the last few games that he definitely has ability. So im now thinking maybe worth a punt in a Thierry Small way? Not sure.
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 23,029
    Question for the naysayers, what if we don't sign him and blow a couple of million on a first teamer, only to find out that they aren't all that and we could have signed Fevrier cheaper, and knew what he was all about already? No-one is guaranteed to make it. 

    I reckon he's worth a cheeky bid, he'll be fine as a squad player at least and not everyone we sign can be for the first XI, especially when we have no fit wingbacks in our squad, just a crocked Edwards and 3 loanees
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 4,435
    He's already shown he can be a valuable addition to a match day squad, he's settled here now.
  • Gisappointed
    Gisappointed Posts: 1,175
    He can play LWB. What's not to like?

  • Sponsored links:



  • Addicksi
    Addicksi Posts: 143
    Perfect opportunity with the Tanto situation let's get something done even if we have to sweeten it some. 
    Fevrier has just proved he can cut the championship. He's really versatile, physical and fast with an end product. Not just the last game but flashes in cameos too.
  • MartinCAFC
    MartinCAFC Posts: 3,382
    I would make him the only squad player signing given we need to bring in two RWB’s. The fact he can also cover LWB and allow us to play a 4-2-3-1 is a bonus too.
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 38,802
    sam3110 said:
    Question for the naysayers, what if we don't sign him and blow a couple of million on a first teamer, only to find out that they aren't all that and we could have signed Fevrier cheaper, and knew what he was all about already? No-one is guaranteed to make it. 

    I reckon he's worth a cheeky bid, he'll be fine as a squad player at least and not everyone we sign can be for the first XI, especially when we have no fit wingbacks in our squad, just a crocked Edwards and 3 loanees
    We could sign someone and they turn out to be worse, but what if we could sign better but instead they go elsewhere?

    He’s a lot higher rated after these last couple of games. He does look more suited to the Championship than Tanto or Apter and is more comfortable at wing back than TC and other wingers we’ve tried there.

    Bree, Clarke and Dykes though were also “must sign” players but opinions soon changed after they didn’t keep up their initial good form.

    As we need so many wing backs I’d get it if we sign him, but I wouldn’t be concerned if we didn’t bring him back and signed other players instead.
  • Sword65pf
    Sword65pf Posts: 1,734
    I’d imagine a what if i do well? conversation was had when Jayden had the chance to come on loan to us, I think he showed enough to be in with a shout of being signed, really don’t see a down side to signing him, as others have said he is young and versatile, the fella bust a gut for us whenever he got his chance. I’d be happy enough to see him with us and see if he can improve more.
  • wmcf123 said:
    The fact he can play left and right wing back and higher up the pitch make him a perfect squad signing imo.

    I don’t think we should be making squad signings .  We need to improve the first team and I doubt there will be a lot of money kicking around unless we can sell MBick for the sam money that was being spoken about in January 

    Sure.  Sign better than what we have and what we have becomes the back up.  Makes sense.  Except we don't have a single RWB currently so will need to sign two.  Would love it if we got him and Bree, for example.
  • charltonbob
    charltonbob Posts: 8,630

    He can play LWB. What's not to like?
    But where will TC play when NJ starts tinkering ?
  • BalladMan
    BalladMan Posts: 1,400
    One goal less than Campbell on only 1/2 season. Sign the guy up. 
  • MartinCAFC
    MartinCAFC Posts: 3,382
    edited April 30

    He can play LWB. What's not to like?
    But where will TC play when NJ starts tinkering ?
    On the opposite flank to Fevrier if playing a 4-2-3-1. If playing wingbacks hopefully TC would be on the bench. Recruitment needs to allow all bases to be covered so TC plays out wide and not as a wingback or striker through the middle.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 71,768
    The awkward thing for us in negotiations with Stockport , is that Fevrier has gone from a Stockport squad player to someone we'd like to sign, whereas Tanto has gone the other way. 

    Stockport are weirdly in a good negotiating position now 
  • MartinCAFC
    MartinCAFC Posts: 3,382
    The awkward thing for us in negotiations with Stockport , is that Fevrier has gone from a Stockport squad player to someone we'd like to sign, whereas Tanto has gone the other way. 

    Stockport are weirdly in a good negotiating position now 
    Unless Stockport don't get promoted and Fevrier tells them he wants to stay here.