Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Reebok it is then (new 3rd shirt p51)

1…7172737476

Comments

  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 2,348
    mart77 said:

    I do hope he doesn't try to get his spotless white gloves dirty, by trying to catch the muddy ball. 
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 2,348
    ElfsborgAddick said:
    Exiled_Addick said:
    Better than last season’s dog’s dinner, but I still don’t like it. White collar is too high and too thick and why are the sleeves so short?

    I’ve been really disappointed with the Reebok kits so far, worst we’ve had since the Nike catalogue offerings.

    I’m not the target audience though and only ever buy kits in the end of season stock clearance sale so doesn’t really matter what I think!

    I'm with you on this.
    I liked the tops brought out by Hummel, Makros were not too bad either.
    The car park could get a bit naughty 👊 
  • Sword65pf
    Sword65pf Posts: 1,984
    CaptainRobbo said:
    mart77 said:

    I do hope he doesn't try to get his spotless white gloves dirty, by trying to catch the muddy ball. 
    Don’t think the goal line gets that muddy, he doesn’t go further out than that
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,734
    Drab as fuck, but if these suppliers fuck around with it that causes issues as well.

    Oh for a far away time, where all this new kit malarky was mote verging on non-existant. Where boots were cloggs and a wet laced football could maim and injure in equal measure.

    It's red and white. Play on.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 20,174
    Shorts have a big red stripe down the side 



    Socks are smart



  • cafc_4life
    cafc_4life Posts: 486
    the joys of being a championship side.........already on DH Gate! (although a 2 month delivery time!)
  • Ross
    Ross Posts: 4,449
    Shirt does look better in the render on the online store.


  • Cafc451
    Cafc451 Posts: 74
    West ham charge £75.
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 27,958
    Lincoln is 55
  • fenlandaddick
    fenlandaddick Posts: 2,210
    MrOneLung said:
    Lincoln is 55
    Life is cheaper here generally.


  • Sponsored links:



  • fenlandaddick
    fenlandaddick Posts: 2,210
    Green hoodie, sword badge and key ring arrived yesterday.
    Chuffed with them all. Hoodie is good quality and a good fit  in a medium  -  nice colour and details.
    Key ring and sword badge , for the money, are also very good.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,997
    MrOneLung said:
    Lincoln is 55
    £53.10 for ours with the Valley Gold discount, which I had completely forgot about but was automatically applied! 
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 14,602
    Crusty54 said:
    Garrymanilow said:
    I like it. It's simple as the home shirt should be. The main positive I'm taking is that if Jodie Hutton is modelling it then she's likely staying, which is good because I like Jodie Hutton
    She's on the list of players still under contract.
    Thanks Colin
  • Uboat
    Uboat Posts: 12,508
    I think that’s the best we could have hoped for. My ideal Charlton shirt would be a round white neck on a solid red shirt, with the minimum of nonsense. I hate sponsors’ logos on sleeves and the back and various bullshit lines cluttering things up. 
  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,478
    Uboat said:
    I think that’s the best we could have hoped for. My ideal Charlton shirt would be a round white neck on a solid red shirt, with the minimum of nonsense. I hate sponsors’ logos on sleeves and the back and various bullshit lines cluttering things up. 
    I agree on the sponsor’s logos everywhere, but I’m afraid that’s the world we’re in now with the new financial rules.  Unfortunately, this will all go towards determining what we can spend and we are miles off the pace at the moment.  
  • StrikerFirmani
    StrikerFirmani Posts: 2,818
    Hate the manufacturers having more than one of their logos on the shirt and frankly don't think it is a good shirt. The designs by people on here have been much more inspiring.

       
  • Mendonca In Asdas
    Mendonca In Asdas Posts: 22,944
    I’m a bit meh, about the new shirt, but what new / different can they come up with, without upsetting the fan base.

    Im sure if we make it to the playoffs final at Wembley this season, I can see myself and a lot of other blokes dad dancing round Wembley in it.

  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 7,496
    StrikerFirmani said:
    Hate the manufacturers having more than one of their logos on the shirt and frankly don't think it is a good shirt. The designs by people on here have been much more inspiring.

       
    I agree. 

    Somehow the logo on the shoulder is much more jarring than when Admiral, and later Le Coq, repeated their logos continuously down the arm (1970s long sleeved admiral kits would have had more than 40 Admiral logos on the shirt…)
  • Rufus is a dogs name
    Rufus is a dogs name Posts: 1,604
    edited July 3
    On the most recent close ups, it actually looks like the badge, although not stitched, is actually a higher quality textured/raised print as opposed to the cheap plastic transfer we had last season 

  • DamoNorthStand
    DamoNorthStand Posts: 12,804
    Ross said:
    Shirt does look better in the render on the online store.


    See thats why i was saying Arsenal... when it is laid flat the white on the arms is much more prominent and looks less plain...

  • Sponsored links:



  • shine166
    shine166 Posts: 14,490
    Rufus is a dogs name said:
    On the most recent close ups, it actually looks like the badge, although not stitched, is actually a higher quality textured/raised print as opposed to the cheap plastic transfer we had last season 

    Thats good news, saw a team wearing reebok in the WC last week and the logos were falling off. 
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 2,348
    edited July 3
    shine166 said:
    Rufus is a dogs name said:
    On the most recent close ups, it actually looks like the badge, although not stitched, is actually a higher quality textured/raised print as opposed to the cheap plastic transfer we had last season 

    Thats good news, saw a team wearing reebok in the WC last week and the logos were falling off. 
    Are Castore supplying any nations for the World Cup?
    Available to fans for July 2027.
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 23,696
    The gradient in the back is more noticeable in the flesh
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,997
    Three sponsor logos and three Reebok logos feels excessive. Not sure the additional reebok logos on the arms were necessary. 
  • Crusty54
    Crusty54 Posts: 3,453
    The logos on the shoulders were so small to be hardly visible during the Dartford game last night.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 20,174
    Crusty54 said:
    The logos on the shoulders were so small to be hardly visible during the Dartford game last night.
    As was Reece Burke clearly 
  • Crusty54
    Crusty54 Posts: 3,453
    edited July 4
    fenaddick said:
    Crusty54 said:
    The logos on the shoulders were so small to be hardly visible during the Dartford game last night.
    As was Reece Burke clearly 
    I've already explained. The players were mostly wearing last season's shirt numbers. Care to guess what number Alex Mitchell was allocated last season before his loan?
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 14,602
    Crusty54 said:
    fenaddick said:
    Crusty54 said:
    The logos on the shoulders were so small to be hardly visible during the Dartford game last night.
    As was Reece Burke clearly 
    I've already explained. The players were mostly wearing last season's shirt numbers. Care to guess what number Alex Mitchell was allocated last season before his loan?
    Are you not able to tell humans apart though?
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 23,696
    They also announced the lineup at the stadium and Said "Number 4 Reece Burke", as well as it being mentioned several times on the commentary, and of course all of the online team sheets etc saying Burke and not Mitchell
  • Crusty54
    Crusty54 Posts: 3,453
    sam3110 said:
    They also announced the lineup at the stadium and Said "Number 4 Reece Burke", as well as it being mentioned several times on the commentary, and of course all of the online team sheets etc saying Burke and not Mitchell
    The team sheets and ground announcements had several errors as with JRC and Apter. 

Categories