Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Summer Window 2026 - Rumours and Discussion
Comments
-
Someone told me a few weeks ago that the owners weren't happy with how Nathan spent money last summer so he'd have to rely on money raised from sales and on freebies. I didn't believe it.2
-
For what it is worth I was told that the contract had been signed before the weekend. I’m sure I said that at the time.ShootersHillGuru said:Might explain today’s foreign no show
Until this announcement I expected him to rock up tomorrow.
May I be the first fan to say FUCK!4 -
In a good way...?Redrobo said:
For what it is worth I was told that the contract had been signed before the weekend. I’m sure I said that at the time.ShootersHillGuru said:Might explain today’s foreign no show
Until this announcement I expected him to rock up tomorrow.
May I be the first fan to say FUCK!1 -
Guessing there’s a good chance we lose both Jones and Ramsay now.4
-
I don’t think we will sell Jones, the owners know that would basically secure our relegation and any chance they have of a decent sale. Even with Ramsay it’ll only be if we get a decent fee and can get a replacement inCafcSteve said:Guessing there’s a good chance we lose both Jones and Ramsay now.4 -
Its not sold yet and we are worth a lot more in the championship. Let's try to not panic.19
-
Agree with this, however with our recent history of car crash ownerships it's very hard not to panicMeerKat said:Its not sold yet and we are worth a lot more in the championship. Let's try to not panic.2 -
It might explain the TC noise if the rumour of £2.5m is correct that goes along way towards a CM which we all know is badly needed0
-
This content has been removed.
-
Cawley seems to be suggesting that the guardian article could be misleading and they may just be continuing to seek extra investment? Maybe I'm clutching at straws.26
-
Sponsored links:
-
Well they claim to have seen the sales pitch. Has Cawley?ButtleJR said:Cawley seems to be suggesting that the guardian article could be misleading and they may just be continuing to seek extra investment? Maybe I'm clutching at straws.1 -
I can claim to have seen it.LargeAddick said:
Well they claim to have seen the sales pitch. Has Cawley?ButtleJR said:Cawley seems to be suggesting that the guardian article could be misleading and they may just be continuing to seek extra investment? Maybe I'm clutching at straws.
Doesn't mean it's true0 -
I think it’s safe to assume that they’ve seen it.sam3110 said:
I can claim to have seen it.LargeAddick said:
Well they claim to have seen the sales pitch. Has Cawley?ButtleJR said:Cawley seems to be suggesting that the guardian article could be misleading and they may just be continuing to seek extra investment? Maybe I'm clutching at straws.
Doesn't mean it's true10 -
There’s a good chance they have seen a very similar sales deck to the one that was seen in December, and doing what all papers do and sensationalising it into a headline.9
-
There would surely be a sales pitch for an investment as much as their would be a sale.LargeAddick said:
Well they claim to have seen the sales pitch. Has Cawley?ButtleJR said:Cawley seems to be suggesting that the guardian article could be misleading and they may just be continuing to seek extra investment? Maybe I'm clutching at straws.1 -
8-8-8ct_addick said:So what’s the long term plan now then Gavin?6 -
Can I just say the silver lining at times like this is that the doom and gloom brigade get to be smug, so happy for them.6
-
Amr Zidan was looking to invest in Preston.Now that would be funny.4
-
Unfortunately appear to have been on the money. Just like I was Piergianni.Braziliance said:
I don't believe the owners are here for the long run, they're here to just try and flip a profit at some stage, and it appears their strategy is to do the bare minimum in doing so, which to be fair so far has worked.mcgrandall said:
Sorry, but no they aren't. They were demerged from Bet365 in 24/25, transferred to Stoke City Holdings, and their debts wiped. Which is why their have been able to spend as they have.TheHerminator said:
They are owned by Bet365 essentially who keep investing in equity stakes in the football club. It isn’t a sustainable model but it means short term they can spend big on playersmcgrandall said:
I'm not advocating our owners spend more, but how come Stoke have spent so much this year? Not sold any players for large transfer fees in years and have a similar turnover to ours. Could be their owner selling the club to themselves and wiping £80m of debt, so they ended the year in "profit". There is always a way around the rules.SouthLincsAddick said:
Well said!elbiglad said:I am getting a bit bored of some of the negative and short sighted comments being posted on here. I don’t know what people were expecting.
I hate that we have so much squad turnover every year but we desperately needed reinforcements. The transition the club has gone through necessitates this overhaul. The depth wasn’t there and the loans ending meant we lost four or five starters. So it was clear a massive influx of players was needed.
Let’s say we needed to bring in a minimum of seven players. When you need this many and only have a budget of around £10m, then you have to be clever in how you spend your money. Really basic stuff. So, it makes sense to spend no money on a back up right back who has good champ experience. It makes sense to bring in a decent striking option for no money when you have decent depth there already and have assessed that other options are likely too expensive. It makes sense to concentrate your spending on positions of most serious need to to bring in extra quality where t matters when decent, cheaper options are available in other positions. This is just common-sense squad building.
It seems to me that some people didn’t understand what slow, sustainable and sensible growth meant. It never meant that if we stay in the Championship for one year we will then blow the league out the water. It won’t happen next summer either, by the way. As a side note, it’s also not how football finances work so it’s no good talking about how rich our owners are. At this moment in time, unless we sell someone for big money or agree a huge sponsorship deal with an American airline or streaming service, this is the only feasible way for us to improve.
Jones has made a rod for his own back (for some) with the ‘ruthless’ comments. When, in reality, he was most likely just talking about some of the business that needed to be done, not all. Letting a midfield prospect who is a hard worker and, by all accounts, amazing character that has been with the club since the age of 8 leave is quite ruthless. Letting a reliable squad option who scored the goal to promote the club leave is quite ruthless. The likely exit of a young academy striker who won League 2 player of the year is quite ruthless. Any additions in centre mid that move Coventry or Docherty down the pecking order should be considered ruthless. Why does signing a back up right back have to be judged by this metric? Who can name all of the Luke Young backups from the Curbishley years? It’s not an overly important position.I am not an ITK. But the signing of Alli for £1m shows, to me, that there is money to be spent. This was not necessarily a position of need and there are plenty of free agent wingers available. So to spend money on this player shows that firstly, they rate him, and secondly, it suggests there is money available for the right targets. It signals there is more to come.Jones is an outspoken man who finds it borderline impossible to bite his tongue. If there was no money or the board had let him down I think we’d have heard something, or picked up on a sly comment. It’s been quite the opposite. He has told fans to be patient. The season starts in just under three weeks and the window shuts in five. He has repeatedly said there is more to come and quality takes time.
We all want more in. We all want improved quality. I definitely don’t enjoy watching us hoof it up to Dykes. But the window isn’t done. They are implementing a formation change. Let’s just give things some time.
I think the negative posters don’t want to understand the financial situation we’re in. A small but vocal minority have always created a lot of noise mostly through wilful ignorance. Professional football people would wet themselves at some of the comments on here, it’s so far from reality. Remember, this is only a fans forum, none of us have any pro experience at coaching a football team or even understand the basics of football finance.
If the owners wanted to put more money in, they could find a way. I've seen it suggested that the recent change in the rules is a way to drive down players wages in the Championship. Which, considering the state of finances in the Championship, seems quite sensible.
As I said, if the owners wanted to spend big they could find a way. I think @Doucher is bang on the money and, unless we have some incredible recruitment, consigned to circle the drain.
It was heavily hinted at one of those Addicks meetings that Roland still owning the club held us back from improving the matchday experience and our plan is essentially waiting for an old man to die and hope his son offers a better deal for the stadium. You then look at Birmingham City and Wrexham's owners (who combined have a lower networth than one of ours) yet they're willing to pump millions into the infrastructure of the club. (A billion in Birminghams case)
The plan will be to keep using the TV money and whatever else to keep us afloat until someone comes along to buy us.
I don't mind by the way, as the alternative for us was a lot worse, but no one can convince themselves they're doing everything in their power to make us a competitive championship side, it is the bare minimum to avoid relegation.6 -
Sponsored links:
-
Mendez and Cawley doing a podcast tomorrow evening that will be very interesting hopefully get the full picture his article makes it seems like we’re blowing this out of proportion11
-
This content has been removed.
-
Let’s say we are looking to raise £20-30m (for example)…. And they bought the club for £15m with a promotion since. To raise that sum of money would at the very least require a significant dilution across the cap table …. Or an incentivised return on sale which I can’t see anybody agreeing to.
In that scenario it would make sense if some wanted to / agreed to exit even if one or two were keen to follow on.
With the money going around in the championship now (which has shot up in the last twelve months) I would suggest the amount we want to raise may have gone up meaning more room needs to be found round the table1 -
They said nothings changed since the announcement back earlier in the year, they’re just continuing to look for more investment!2
-
.0
-
a fair point it seemsCurbsgoldenera said:.1 -
Akillerandflash said:
Finally, a proper replacement for Rory Delap's long throws.NabySarr said:Harry Clarke off to Stoke for £3.5m. Think that’s quite a lot of money for him tbh0 -
999 its an emergencyPringlesCurtains said:
8-8-8ct_addick said:So what’s the long term plan now then Gavin?1 -
So we’re announcing Holsgrove tomorrow..? Right?

6 -
Can Coventry and Doc play together in an 8 though?PringlesCurtains said:
8-8-8ct_addick said:So what’s the long term plan now then Gavin?2













