Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

should we have got chris perry back ?

letthegoodtimesroll
letthegoodtimesroll Posts: 10,796
edited August 2007 in General Charlton
i cant help thinking that perhaps with him holding the line our back four might be able to get their act together and show a bit of stability...

Comments

  • leftbehind
    leftbehind Posts: 8,581
    yeah why not
  • nolly
    nolly Posts: 12,122
    chris perry would solve it at the back,we kept fortune but got rid of perry,why?
  • F-Blocker
    F-Blocker Posts: 3,409
    edited August 2007
    Perry was out of contract last year when Dowie was putting his "stamp" on the squad. Personally, I'd have kept him...
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,371
    He's at The Valley today. Currently a free agent... sign him up!
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,990
    Good player ....... but must be around the same age as Chris Dailly.

    Needs a big CB beside him.
  • Been on here before about why did Chris Perry go!. Always a dependable player, but I am told others were 'better'..... quite what the 'better' was meant to suggest seemed vague to me!. I like my defenders to be dependable, solid, and in simple terms 'defend' know when to tackle and when to stand off!
    Obviously far too simplistic for today's game....... in the third division!.... like today's goal!

    Perhaps he was not prepared to be a squad player!, although I doubt that. Seems a long time now, and like Fortune perhaps it is best that he does not return. One of the more forgotten players in our glory years, but not by all!
  • cafc999
    cafc999 Posts: 4,991
    Mr Perry was at the tranmere match watching
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,990
    No truth in the rumour that he'd rather sign for Tranmere, after watching our 1st half performance yesterday?

    ;o)
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,776
    [cite]Posted By: ken from bexley[/cite]Been on here before about why did Chris Perry go!. Always a dependable player, but I am told others were 'better'..... quite what the 'better' was meant to suggest seemed vague to me!. I like my defenders to be dependable, solid, and in simple terms 'defend' know when to tackle and when to stand off!
    Obviously far too simplistic for today's game....... in the third division!.... like today's goal!

    Perhaps he was not prepared to be a squad player!, although I doubt that. Seems a long time now, and like Fortune perhaps it is best that he does not return. One of the more forgotten players in our glory years, but not by all!
    I think it was on here I read that when Dowie came in he said no player over 30 would be a part of his squad.
  • Wheresmeticket
    Wheresmeticket Posts: 17,304
    Yeh well that was before we looked like a solid conference team. We no longer give a f*** about flair, we want dependability. By which we mean someone who can kick a ball without falling over.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Crusty54
    Crusty54 Posts: 3,276
    Not time to go back to the future.

    Somebody younger is required.
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 29,023
    We could have Perry, Doc and Dailly in a three man back line.

    If we wanted to field a defence with a combined age of over 100 that is!
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,282
    [cite]Posted By: Wheresmeticket?[/cite]Yeh well that was before we looked like a solid conference team. We no longer give a f*** about flair, we want dependability. By which we mean someone who can kick a ball without falling over.

    That rules Robbie out then.