Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Lee Martin

BowieAddick
BowieAddick Posts: 1,192
edited August 2011 in General Charlton

Paul Jewell has said that Lee Martin was immature for giving the referee the opportunity to send him off on Saturday!

His answer - 'I'm not talkling to him'

Very mature!

Comments

  • rambler
    rambler Posts: 94
    Didn't think that challenge warranted a straight red card. 
    Commentator Legard did, but I've ceased to trust his words ever since he commentated so badly on Formula 1.
    As for Jewell, 'I've seen cheese that is more mature...'
  • ISawLeaburnScore
    ISawLeaburnScore Posts: 9,780
    Joke sending off and a bigger joke that it warranted no comment from the fls
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,493
    It was a bad tackle and deseved a red card. Martin had a few good games with us and the last time he played at Peterborough he was our man of the match in a 5-1 win. Unfortunately he is 24 years of age going on 12, but, I'd welcome him back at the valley anytime, Powell would sort him out
  • rikofold
    rikofold Posts: 4,051
    Never a sending off.  He played the ball first, his feet weren't off the ground and another referee wouldn't even have given a foul. Jewell's obviously pissed off, but if Martin's immature for making a tackle then that might explain why Ipswich have lost 12 goals in 2 games.
  • charltonbob
    charltonbob Posts: 8,346
    It was a bad tackle and deseved a red card. Martin had a few good games with us and the last time he played at Peterborough he was our man of the match in a 5-1 win. Unfortunately he is 24 years of age going on 12, but, I'd welcome him back at the valley anytime, Powell would sort him out

    How the hell can it be a bad tackle when he played the ball ????
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,990
    I see the Beeb site gave Peterboro 90% possession ......and Ipswich 10%.

    I know Ipswich were walloped 7-1 with 9 men, but still sounds ridiculously low to me.
  • ChicagoAddick
    ChicagoAddick Posts: 4,420
    I think due to the reporting dispute, the BBC are making their stats up.
  • Miserableoldgit
    Miserableoldgit Posts: 21,458
    I think due to the reporting dispute, the BBC are making their stats up.


    Only 74% apparently.....
  • Ormiston_Addick
    Ormiston_Addick Posts: 8,818

    Terrible decision, he got the ball and then his momentum carried him through to the player.

    Should be over-turned but obviously won't be.

  • ColinTat
    ColinTat Posts: 2,794
    Peter 90% possession?  Sounds like that match when they put out about 8 central defenders against Man U, and got absolutely leathered.  I believe one great Eddie Youds may have been one of the defenders!

  • Sponsored links:



  • Mortimerician
    Mortimerician Posts: 5,222
    It was a bad tackle and deseved a red card. Martin had a few good games with us and the last time he played at Peterborough he was our man of the match in a 5-1 win. Unfortunately he is 24 years of age going on 12, but, I'd welcome him back at the valley anytime, Powell would sort him out

    How the hell can it be a bad tackle when he played the ball ????
    Check the rules of the game? 
  • charltonbob
    charltonbob Posts: 8,346
    It was a bad tackle and deseved a red card. Martin had a few good games with us and the last time he played at Peterborough he was our man of the match in a 5-1 win. Unfortunately he is 24 years of age going on 12, but, I'd welcome him back at the valley anytime, Powell would sort him out

    How the hell can it be a bad tackle when he played the ball ????
    Check the rules of the game? 

    thats a bit vague, would you care to enlighten me as to which rule(s) you are refering to ?
  • tangoflash
    tangoflash Posts: 10,799
    Can't say I'm bothered what he does. Was underwhelmed when he came to us and was justified of my thoughts when he left.
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,990
    There are no rules in football.

    ;o)
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,823
    He is a frustrating player as for me he has a terrific amount of ability but a very poor football brain. I didn't see any signs of improvement in that respect when he was with us as I was hoping. He is a huge luxury to have in your side -IMO if he doesn't improve the basics of his game he is too much of a luxury.
  • LawrieAbrahams
    LawrieAbrahams Posts: 3,780
    It was a bad tackle and deseved a red card. Martin had a few good games with us and the last time he played at Peterborough he was our man of the match in a 5-1 win. Unfortunately he is 24 years of age going on 12, but, I'd welcome him back at the valley anytime, Powell would sort him out

    How the hell can it be a bad tackle when he played the ball ????
    Check the rules of the game? 

    thats a bit vague, would you care to enlighten me as to which rule(s) you are refering to ?
    If you take the ball and the man it can still be a foul. Martin dived into the challenge, it was dangerous and whether he touched the ball or not is irrelevant.
  • Jarman
    Jarman Posts: 1,851
    There was nothing wrong with the tackle. And for his manager to come out and say that is a joke.
  • Ormiston_Addick
    Ormiston_Addick Posts: 8,818
    There was nothing wrong with the tackle. And for his manager to come out and say that is a joke.




    I agree, if people are getting sent off for those tackles every week then nobody will ever finish with 11 men.

    The tackles by Bardsley and Cattermole in the Sunderland/Newcastle game were shocking, Martin's was a booking at best.

  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 23,124
    Doing pretty well now by the sounds of it:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17095852
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,575
    Always rated him.

Categories

“Marketplace”