Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Premier League 25/26
Comments
-
Wiping out a player is okay because afterwards he shades the ball with his toe thanks to Gyokeres touching it past him.ForeverAddickted said:Hmm... Not sure on that... Really difficult decision actually.
I think that Pope makes contact with the ball, but cant be sure3 -
Got to start punching strikers when they're through on goal if you're able to get a small touch on the ball it seems.Cafctekkers said:That's a bonkers VAR decision, basically you're allowed to take a player out as long as you get the smallest touch on the ball0 -
Right decision in the end….0
-
That decision is beyond farcical. The ball was played onto Pope’s foot and he then cleaned him out. Absolute stonewall penalty and red card.
VAR decisions are getting worse and worse.0 -
Wouldnt have been a Red Card though would it, because of double jeopardy?Clem_Snide said:That decision is beyond farcical. The ball was played onto Pope’s foot and he then cleaned him out. Absolute stonewall penalty and red card.
VAR decisions are getting worse and worse.
One rule I can genuinely never work out these days0 -
Would've been a yellow regardless, there was another defender and the ball went off to the side.1
-
Just seen the decision, if it's Dan Burn making that challenge we say it's a good tackle and the game moves on. Why would it be different for a keeper? It wouldn't be a foul elsewhere on the pitch1
-
Time for defenders to double-foot strikers through on goal as long as they graze the ball afterwards it seems.fenaddick said:Just seen the decision, if it's Dan Burn making that challenge we say it's a good tackle and the game moves on. Why would it be different for a keeper? It wouldn't be a foul elsewhere on the pitch0 -
FWIW, even I thought it was a penalty...SELR_addicks said:The Liverpool fan ref taking away a stonewall penalty there. Have to laugh.1 -
"There's also a fairly weird issue that needs to be ironed out by IFAB.
When Gillett blew for that penalty Saka had possession in the penalty area (not a prime spot because he'd slowed down).
End result of Arsenal not getting a penalty wasn't even a drop ball but Pope possession."2 - Sponsored links:
-
Double foot? One of his feet is behind him! And it doesn't follow through eitherSELR_addicks said:
Time for defenders to double-foot strikers through on goal as long as they graze the ball afterwards it seems.fenaddick said:Just seen the decision, if it's Dan Burn making that challenge we say it's a good tackle and the game moves on. Why would it be different for a keeper? It wouldn't be a foul elsewhere on the pitch
https://x.com/SkySportsPL/status/19723298176650613340 -
And you're using that screenshot to say it's not a clear penalty?fenaddick said:
Double foot? One of his feet is behind him! And it doesn't follow through eitherSELR_addicks said:
Time for defenders to double-foot strikers through on goal as long as they graze the ball afterwards it seems.fenaddick said:Just seen the decision, if it's Dan Burn making that challenge we say it's a good tackle and the game moves on. Why would it be different for a keeper? It wouldn't be a foul elsewhere on the pitch
https://x.com/SkySportsPL/status/1972329817665061334
I didn't say that's what Pope did. But if the rules are that as long as you graze the ball everything before it is fair game, defenders have free reign to assault strikers as long as they touch the ball afterwards.1 -
But he gave the pen and only took it away after consulting the VAR team. Are they all Liverpool fans too? And corrupt?SELR_addicks said:The Liverpool fan ref taking away a stonewall penalty there. Have to laugh.
Regardless of the rights and wrongs of the decision, your conspiracy theories are pathetic.
2 -
No, I'm using it to say he doesn't "double foot" him...SELR_addicks said:
And you're using that screenshot to say it's not a clear penalty?fenaddick said:
Double foot? One of his feet is behind him! And it doesn't follow through eitherSELR_addicks said:
Time for defenders to double-foot strikers through on goal as long as they graze the ball afterwards it seems.fenaddick said:Just seen the decision, if it's Dan Burn making that challenge we say it's a good tackle and the game moves on. Why would it be different for a keeper? It wouldn't be a foul elsewhere on the pitch
https://x.com/SkySportsPL/status/19723298176650613341 -
Need to improve your reading comprehension skills. See above.fenaddick said:
No, I'm using it to say he doesn't "double foot" him...SELR_addicks said:
And you're using that screenshot to say it's not a clear penalty?fenaddick said:
Double foot? One of his feet is behind him! And it doesn't follow through eitherSELR_addicks said:
Time for defenders to double-foot strikers through on goal as long as they graze the ball afterwards it seems.fenaddick said:Just seen the decision, if it's Dan Burn making that challenge we say it's a good tackle and the game moves on. Why would it be different for a keeper? It wouldn't be a foul elsewhere on the pitch
https://x.com/SkySportsPL/status/19723298176650613341 -
This ref is banned from reffing against Everton but is allowed to ref against Liverpool's biggest title rivals.lordromford said:
But he gave the pen and only took it away after consulting the VAR team. Are they all Liverpool fans too? And corrupt?SELR_addicks said:The Liverpool fan ref taking away a stonewall penalty there. Have to laugh.
Your conspiracy theories are pathetic.4 -
Good header
Weak, very weak from the Arsenal defender to claim a "push" - Reminded me of the "foul" I asked whether should have been a penalty for a push on Campbell yesterday.0 -
I don’t necessarily disagree that the decision was wrong, but at least be honest. Pope got the ball before contact with Gyokeres.SELR_addicks said:
Wiping out a player is okay because afterwards he shades the ball with his toe thanks to Gyokeres touching it past him.ForeverAddickted said:Hmm... Not sure on that... Really difficult decision actually.
I think that Pope makes contact with the ball, but cant be sure0 -
To be fair to you I do think this is a slight blindspot. Later in the season and he doesn't ref this. On the whole I actually think it would be fine for him to ref any game, his job is to be objective but if you're going to restrict who they do get to ref then you have to consider more than just tradtional rivalsSELR_addicks said:
This ref is banned from reffing against Everton but is allowed to ref against Liverpool's biggest title rivals.lordromford said:
But he gave the pen and only took it away after consulting the VAR team. Are they all Liverpool fans too? And corrupt?SELR_addicks said:The Liverpool fan ref taking away a stonewall penalty there. Have to laugh.
Your conspiracy theories are pathetic.1 -
So you’re just ignoring my point and doubling down then, yeah?SELR_addicks said:
This ref is banned from reffing against Everton but is allowed to ref against Liverpool's biggest title rivals.lordromford said:
But he gave the pen and only took it away after consulting the VAR team. Are they all Liverpool fans too? And corrupt?SELR_addicks said:The Liverpool fan ref taking away a stonewall penalty there. Have to laugh.
Your conspiracy theories are pathetic.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Hahahaha resident Gooner absolutely rattled as per…14
-
Ask any Liverpool fan. I guarantee 80-90% of them don't actually care whether Everton win or lose, but will be checking City and Arsenal results every week. It's such a poor way to counter potential bias.fenaddick said:
To be fair to you I do think this is a slight blindspot. Later in the season and he doesn't ref this. On the whole I actually think it would be fine for him to ref any game, his job is to be objective but if you're going to restrict who they do get to ref then you have to consider more than just tradtional rivalsSELR_addicks said:
This ref is banned from reffing against Everton but is allowed to ref against Liverpool's biggest title rivals.lordromford said:
But he gave the pen and only took it away after consulting the VAR team. Are they all Liverpool fans too? And corrupt?SELR_addicks said:The Liverpool fan ref taking away a stonewall penalty there. Have to laugh.
Your conspiracy theories are pathetic.2 -
Again, not afterwards.SELR_addicks said:
And you're using that screenshot to say it's not a clear penalty?fenaddick said:
Double foot? One of his feet is behind him! And it doesn't follow through eitherSELR_addicks said:
Time for defenders to double-foot strikers through on goal as long as they graze the ball afterwards it seems.fenaddick said:Just seen the decision, if it's Dan Burn making that challenge we say it's a good tackle and the game moves on. Why would it be different for a keeper? It wouldn't be a foul elsewhere on the pitch
https://x.com/SkySportsPL/status/1972329817665061334
I didn't say that's what Pope did. But if the rules are that as long as you graze the ball everything before it is fair game, defenders have free reign to assault strikers as long as they touch the ball afterwards.
Just be honest.0 -
Turning into quite a good feisty match this is for the neutral1
-
How I wish Lloyd Jones had headed like that yesterday, the power Woltemade gets from his neck is so good3
-
Your head has proper gone 🤣SELR_addicks said:
Ask any Liverpool fan. I guarantee 80-90% of them don't actually care whether Everton win or lose, but will be checking City and Arsenal results every week. It's such a poor way to counter potential bias.fenaddick said:
To be fair to you I do think this is a slight blindspot. Later in the season and he doesn't ref this. On the whole I actually think it would be fine for him to ref any game, his job is to be objective but if you're going to restrict who they do get to ref then you have to consider more than just tradtional rivalsSELR_addicks said:
This ref is banned from reffing against Everton but is allowed to ref against Liverpool's biggest title rivals.lordromford said:
But he gave the pen and only took it away after consulting the VAR team. Are they all Liverpool fans too? And corrupt?SELR_addicks said:The Liverpool fan ref taking away a stonewall penalty there. Have to laugh.
Your conspiracy theories are pathetic.2 -
SELR_addicks said:
Ask any Liverpool fan. I guarantee 80-90% of them don't actually care whether Everton win or lose, but will be checking City and Arsenal results every week. It's such a poor way to counter potential bias.fenaddick said:
To be fair to you I do think this is a slight blindspot. Later in the season and he doesn't ref this. On the whole I actually think it would be fine for him to ref any game, his job is to be objective but if you're going to restrict who they do get to ref then you have to consider more than just tradtional rivalsSELR_addicks said:
This ref is banned from reffing against Everton but is allowed to ref against Liverpool's biggest title rivals.lordromford said:
But he gave the pen and only took it away after consulting the VAR team. Are they all Liverpool fans too? And corrupt?SELR_addicks said:The Liverpool fan ref taking away a stonewall penalty there. Have to laugh.
Your conspiracy theories are pathetic.
0 -
https://forum.charltonlife.com/discussion/71899/you-know-that-arsenal-fan-called-claude-whos-always-ranting-on-arsenal-tv/p1lordromford said:SELR_addicks said:
Ask any Liverpool fan. I guarantee 80-90% of them don't actually care whether Everton win or lose, but will be checking City and Arsenal results every week. It's such a poor way to counter potential bias.fenaddick said:
To be fair to you I do think this is a slight blindspot. Later in the season and he doesn't ref this. On the whole I actually think it would be fine for him to ref any game, his job is to be objective but if you're going to restrict who they do get to ref then you have to consider more than just tradtional rivalsSELR_addicks said:
This ref is banned from reffing against Everton but is allowed to ref against Liverpool's biggest title rivals.lordromford said:
But he gave the pen and only took it away after consulting the VAR team. Are they all Liverpool fans too? And corrupt?SELR_addicks said:The Liverpool fan ref taking away a stonewall penalty there. Have to laugh.
Your conspiracy theories are pathetic.
More obsessed than I am it seems.1 -
I'm completely neutral but it's a stonewall penalty0
-
Stonewall penalty but it’s Arsenal so great decision6
