Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

After the Millwall game - club reply to CAST p34, further CAST response p45

1606162636466»

Comments

  • Greenhithe
    Greenhithe Posts: 890
    You know the Chelsea fans held back yeah?

    Fuck em.
  • TootingRedArmy
    TootingRedArmy Posts: 575
    edited 12:31PM
    It was very sensible to hold the Chelsea fans back, as per earlier post. 
    Surely in future high risk matches, the stadium announcer at around 85-90 mins informs away fans they are being held back and its also put on the big screen. Fans can decide to wait in the road or stay in their seats with toilets etc.  Or just tell them in advance with clear instructions that no fans will be allowed out of the ground once they have entered, till home fans have left and expect 30mins delay.....simple surely? 
    I have zero sympathy for Chelsea, Millwall or other clubs with hooligan fans being held back they have caused chaos for decades and if they are inconvencied so be it.
    I hope MET Police and our club sort out communication with away fans for all future high risk matches, so our supporters are free to leave safety and without any disrupt, exactly as it should be. 
    You think this was a high risk match, why?
    Why? Chelsea have a large hooligan element like Millwall, Leeds etc. 
    Evidenced before the match down Floyd rd & police teams going in to stop them kicking off.
    (one of my sons mates is a Met policeman who arrived very late & saw it & polices football games) 
    i've seen Chelsea Headhunters in action, both at Valley and The Bridge to know they can't be trusted to behave. A Sat 8pm after a day of alcohol with Chelsea is of course a high risk match. I was very pleased after the match to see the road blocked with vans and large contingent of police and policehorses and get away without having to see any Chelsea fans. Likewise i'm more than happy to wait 30+ mins after the Millwall away to get the train back to London Bridge. 
    It is what it is some clubs are still stuck in the dark ages and their so called fans can't be trusted to behave. 
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,383
  • valleynick66
    valleynick66 Posts: 5,077
    It was very sensible to hold the Chelsea fans back, as per earlier post. 
    Surely in future high risk matches, the stadium announcer at around 85-90 mins informs away fans they are being held back and its also put on the big screen. Fans can decide to wait in the road or stay in their seats with toilets etc.  Or just tell them in advance with clear instructions that no fans will be allowed out of the ground once they have entered, till home fans have left and expect 30mins delay.....simple surely? 
    I have zero sympathy for Chelsea, Millwall or other clubs with hooligan fans being held back they have caused chaos for decades and if they are inconvencied so be it.
    I hope MET Police and our club sort out communication with away fans for all future high risk matches, so our supporters are free to leave safety and without any disrupt, exactly as it should be. 
    The Jimmy Seed stand now has commodes - who knew! 😉😆
  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 29,608
    edited 1:33PM
    It was very sensible to hold the Chelsea fans back, as per earlier post. 
    Surely in future high risk matches, the stadium announcer at around 85-90 mins informs away fans they are being held back and its also put on the big screen. Fans can decide to wait in the road or stay in their seats with toilets etc.  Or just tell them in advance with clear instructions that no fans will be allowed out of the ground once they have entered, till home fans have left and expect 30mins delay.....simple surely? 
    I have zero sympathy for Chelsea, Millwall or other clubs with hooligan fans being held back they have caused chaos for decades and if they are inconvencied so be it.
    I hope MET Police and our club sort out communication with away fans for all future high risk matches, so our supporters are free to leave safety and without any disrupt, exactly as it should be. 
    You think this was a high risk match, why?
    Why? Chelsea have a large hooligan element like Millwall, Leeds etc. 
    Evidenced before the match down Floyd rd & police teams going in to stop them kicking off.
    (one of my sons mates is a Met policeman who arrived very late & saw it & polices football games) 
    i've seen Chelsea Headhunters in action, both at Valley and The Bridge to know they can't be trusted to behave. A Sat 8pm after a day of alcohol with Chelsea is of course a high risk match. I was very pleased after the match to see the road blocked with vans and large contingent of police and policehorses and get away without having to see any Chelsea fans. Likewise i'm more than happy to wait 30+ mins after the Millwall away to get the train back to London Bridge. 
    It is what it is some clubs are still stuck in the dark ages and their so called fans can't be trusted to behave. 
    Do you think Birmingham, Leicester and Portsmouth are high risk?