Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

MATCH THREAD : Charlton Athletic V Swansea City : Saturday 1st November 2025 : KO 15:00

1…89111314…21

Comments

  • AndyG
    AndyG Posts: 5,937
    Ffs all the talk was if we can maintain everyone’s fitness we will be fine.. no catastrophic list of injuries etc then 2 in 45 minutes!!! 
  • msomerton
    msomerton Posts: 2,998
    Swansea have had control of midfield their passing more accurate, except the long cross field balls. All are headed interception seem to end up with a Swansea player. Our only player troubling them is TC. But because Kelman doing nothing they can put three men onto TC. 
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 12,015
    It looked like we needed something different. Maybe enforced subs will be a blessing. Here’s hoping. 
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,650
    I was going to come to this match - glad I didn't!
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,475
    Laddick01 said:
    Part of me of excited to see Fullah given a chance (hopefully)


    As NJ said once Fullah goes in he probably doesn’t come back out.

    “If circumstances were different and I threw him in, then I’m not sure he would come back out.”
  • closet_addick
    closet_addick Posts: 183
    Just tuned in late in the first half. Injuries???

    Also, Conor Coventry is a legend. That was as cool and composed as it gets in a tricky situation at the back. 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,012
    A poor half of football.  Swansea look threatening until they get near the goal, while we looked strangely shaky at the back before the injuries. 
  • IR94
    IR94 Posts: 794
    Hernandez or JRC surely it is?

  • Bailey
    Bailey Posts: 3,284
    Swansea have come with five at the back, one up front, with the full backs moving up when required. I think they will stick with that and try to nick something, if that's the case then it gives us some breathing space with the injuries at the back. Both injuries happened when they were attacking and they did bugger all with that open space. We need to do better going forward, whatever they do. 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,889
    IR94 said:
    Hernandez or JRC surely it is?

    Suspect it'll be Leaburn up top with Kelman, with Campbell at Wing-Back, given how the sub was being prepped

  • Sponsored links:



  • Pedro45
    Pedro45 Posts: 5,846
    Decent half.  Very tactical against a Jones clone. We've looked a little more dangerous but maybe a mistake will win the game. Injuries have shown up our lack of defensive options.  If Burke goes off it'll be TC at wingback. 

    Leaburn needs to be on as Kelman is disinterested.  

    One goal will win this,  hope it's at the covered end!

    COYA!
  • cafcsinger
    cafcsinger Posts: 5,563
    ForeverAddickted said:
    cafcsinger said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    cafcsinger said:
    Poor first half. Swansea better side
    Were they? - Kaminski has had nothing to do, whilst Swansea's 'keeper denied us with a great stop
    Yep, not all about shots. What about Idah ballsing one up?
    Fair, but could say the same about Carey's chance where he had time to play in Kelman
    Agree to disagree. Both sides will think this is winnable 
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,475
    ForeverAddickted said:
    This is where we may pay for letting both Mitchell's leave on loan - Easy with hindsight, and I know they wanted / needed gametime, but we're looking at Gough and Laqeretabua as our backup Defenders now.
    I don’t think it means those decisions were wrong. They’d be unhappy being nowhere near the squad and not match fit, as no senior player is going to regularly play for the u21s.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,400
    I have uttered the words, to the universal disgust of literally everyone near me, 'Michael Hector's available' 
  • Taxi_Lad
    Taxi_Lad Posts: 3,784
    edited November 1
    .
  • IR94
    IR94 Posts: 794
    Kelman shite again, starting to lose faith in this one.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,012
    Taxi_Lad said:
    .
    Swansea have light blue shorts
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,781
    LargeAddick said:
    Burke had been struggling for a while, no surprise to me when he pulled up.
    Should have started with Ramsay like I said...🤷‍♂️
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,506
    Leuth said:
    I have uttered the words, to the universal disgust of literally everyone near me, 'Michael Hector's available' 
    Would rather we started with 10 men. 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,889
    Sheff Utd 0-2 Derby

  • Sponsored links:



  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,012
    Leaburn on for Burke
  • vff
    vff Posts: 6,903
    edited November 1
    Swansea more fluid passing, good press, but not looking great upfront. 
    Charlton best attempt on goal from Gillesephy. Defence looking uncertain. Bell & Burke not looking great before injuries. 
    Lets see how set up is 2nd half
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,889
    IR94 said:
    Kelman shite again, starting to lose faith in this one.
    What's he done wrong today, to lose faith in him?

    The only "issue" is that he maybe should have been more alert for the Carey "shot", but that was stupidly selfish and the sign of a player a bit too confident, as could easily have played Kelman in for a chance
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 11,856
    Second half begins ...
  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 22,882
    Leaburn on for Burke
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 11,631
    TC to LWB from the looks of it 
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 11,856
    Gol! Gol! Gol! Gol! Gol!

    Gooooooooooaaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllllllllll!!!!!!!

    (Have that @ForeverAddickted! 🤣🤣🤣)
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,889
    GOALLL
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 11,631
    KELMAN 
  • DDOUBLEE
    DDOUBLEE Posts: 1,514
    fenaddick said:
    KELMAN 
    NO WAY
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”