Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Winter-January 2026 Transfer Window Rumours ...

1…6768707273

Comments

  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,087
    sam3110 said:
    Definitely Clarke or Scanlon today
    Or both? Okay stop laughing 
  • CB1
    CB1 Posts: 169
    YannTheMann said:
    CB1 said:
    I told you lot it would be today 😉
    When's the next signing gaffer? 100% accuracy from you if you don't count any other day!!!
    Fingers crossed on Wednesday. Don’t think we will announce one tomorrow although I’ll still say it anyway 😂
  • Sword65pf
    Sword65pf Posts: 763
    Really didn’t want Dykes when first rumoured,
    now I might because others want him, 
    but I don’t think I do still
    or do I?, 
    FFS!! I don’t know!!😂🙄
  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 8,787
    Clarke then
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,601
    Henry Irving said:
    CB1 said:
    Right then here we go. I’ve got a feeling we are going to announce a signing today. 😉
    Agree with you. Set a reminder for 4.00pm today
    Have we signed anyone yet  ;)
  • DamoNorthStand
    DamoNorthStand Posts: 11,305
    Seems to be lauded for his versitility. I wonder if we will see a backline of Bree, Ramsay, Jones, Macca and Clarke on Saturday?

    Understand he is right sided bit wondering if NJ would rather have a specialist defender there instead of TC, and allow Campbell to play further forward and / or as an impact sub.
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,781
    DamoNorthStand said:
    Seems to be lauded for his versitility. I wonder if we will see a backline of Bree, Ramsay, Jones, Macca and Clarke on Saturday?

    Understand he is right sided bit wondering if NJ would rather have a specialist defender there instead of TC, and allow Campbell to play further forward and / or as an impact sub.
    I think it’s unlikely he’s chucked in to his first game of the season at LWB. Would suspect he will be on the bench and will come on for one of Burke/Ramsay depending on who is playing RCB 
  • Sword65pf
    Sword65pf Posts: 763
    NabySarr said:
    DamoNorthStand said:
    Seems to be lauded for his versitility. I wonder if we will see a backline of Bree, Ramsay, Jones, Macca and Clarke on Saturday?

    Understand he is right sided bit wondering if NJ would rather have a specialist defender there instead of TC, and allow Campbell to play further forward and / or as an impact sub.
    I think it’s unlikely he’s chucked in to his first game of the season at LWB. Would suspect he will be on the bench and will come on for one of Burke/Ramsay depending on who is playing RCB 
    If he’s fit enough and better than we have, play him
  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 10,937
    Admin, @CB1 predicted that this would happen today and is obviously in the know...... Give him a promote
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 8,336
    WSS said:
    That's Ramsey off then. 🙂
    That was my thought but not necessarily and probably gives us a better negotiating position in the summer when Ramsey is likely to be made a 'sign or on your bike' offer. Be very surprised if there aren't clubs currently further up the food chain interested in Ramsey.

  • Sponsored links:



  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 8,336
    Ipswich owe us a good un - they've more than got their own back over the years after we took Mat Holland. 
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,314
    TheHerminator said:
    Laddick01 said:
    How has Lyndon Dykes become the most wanted player in the Championship. I wouldn’t even be that excited if we signed him on loan.

    With the way Leaburn has played the last few games I’d be OK if we missed out on this one.
    I was wondering this. Having not seen much/any of Dykes play to be honest, is he necessarily an upgrade on Miles who has really hit his straps recently without necessarily banging the goals in?
    Needs a rest though, like so many of our players, Tyreece being another. I dont meean being left out, but being asked to do 60-70 max 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 14,047
    Right, who's next?
  • cfgs
    cfgs Posts: 11,562
    DOUCHER said:
    Ipswich owe us a good un - they've more than got their own back over the years after we took Mat Holland. 
    And Hermann.
  • Radostanradical
    Radostanradical Posts: 989
    Fyi i can now confirm I knew clarke was signing a couple days ago. As you were
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,781
    fenaddick said:
    Right, who's next?
    A LWB and Bree by the weekend would be nice 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 96,924
    fenaddick said:
    Right, who's next?

    I Dont Want To Play With You Anymore Meme Template Meme Generator FREE

  • Sword65pf
    Sword65pf Posts: 763
    DOUCHER said:
    Ipswich owe us a good un - they've more than got their own back over the years after we took Mat Holland. 
    And Hriedarsson And Bent
  • sillav nitram
    sillav nitram Posts: 10,196
    Spoke to my mate, he says we’re in for Harry Clarke. Don’t know how much truth to the rumour. Don’t shoot the messenger.
  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,590
    Cheers @CB1 this wouldn't have happened without your persistence.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Covered_End_Lad
    Covered_End_Lad Posts: 5,781
    edited January 12
    Do we think signing Clarke means we can't agree a deal with Southampton to extend Bree's loan? Or is this likely additional cover with burke/Ramsay's fitness issues.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 14,047
    Covered_End_Lad said:
    Do we think signing Clarke means we can't agree a deal with Southampton to extend Bree's loan? Or is this likely additional cover with burke/Ramsay's fitness issues.
    I think he'll be competing with Burke and Ramsay and Bree/Apter will be wing back options when we have a more stable left side of defence
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,950
    sillav nitram said:
    Spoke to my mate, he says we’re in for Harry Clarke. Don’t know how much truth to the rumour. Don’t shoot the messenger.
    Are his initials IE?
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,813
    Covered_End_Lad said:
    Do we think signing Clarke means we can't agree a deal with Southampton to extend Bree's loan? Or is this likely additional cover with burke/Ramsay's fitness issues.
    Probably with the idea of keeping both, but it's good to have him in before Southampton come calling, as at least we won't be in any worse a position than we are now if they do take Bree
  • CB1
    CB1 Posts: 169
    Braziliance said:
    Cheers @CB1 this wouldn't have happened without your persistence.
    You’re welcome everyone, anytime 😉
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 25,062
    DOUCHER said:
    Ipswich owe us a good un - they've more than got their own back over the years after we took Mat Holland. 
    What an odd comment
  • cfgs
    cfgs Posts: 11,562
    CB1 said:
    Braziliance said:
    Cheers @CB1 this wouldn't have happened without your persistence.
    You’re welcome everyone, anytime 😉
    I have heard that they want to spread the mass of signings out, one a day to show @CB1the proper respect.
  • Sword65pf
    Sword65pf Posts: 763
    Bedsaddick said:
    DOUCHER said:
    Ipswich owe us a good un - they've more than got their own back over the years after we took Mat Holland. 
    What an odd comment
    Is it?, I took that to mean we’ve had some iffy players off of them since then? Not overly odd 🤷🏻‍♂️
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,781
    sam3110 said:
    Covered_End_Lad said:
    Do we think signing Clarke means we can't agree a deal with Southampton to extend Bree's loan? Or is this likely additional cover with burke/Ramsay's fitness issues.
    Probably with the idea of keeping both, but it's good to have him in before Southampton come calling, as at least we won't be in any worse a position than we are now if they do take Bree
    Might help us in the negotiations with Southampton and with Bree if we can appear less desperate to sign him 
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 25,062
    Sword65pf said:
    Bedsaddick said:
    DOUCHER said:
    Ipswich owe us a good un - they've more than got their own back over the years after we took Mat Holland. 
    What an odd comment
    Is it?, I took that to mean we’ve had some iffy players off of them since then? Not overly odd 🤷🏻‍♂️
    I misread it. I though Doucher was criticising Matty Holland. My mistake

Categories

“Marketplace”