Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Solving the left side of the defence

Callumcafc
Callumcafc Posts: 64,812
edited January 4 in General Charlton

You’re allowed to play any formation, any combination of fit and contracted players. What you’re not allowed to do is plug in a new signing.


Who are you playing in your back five / back four?

«1

Comments

  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 13,847
    If we’re allowed to have injured players then 

    Bree/Apter Ramsay Jones Bell Edwards

    If it’s what we have available now then 

    Bree Gough Jones Bell Fullah 
  • billysboots
    billysboots Posts: 1,615
    Today you bring on Goigh and leave Bell where he was 
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,517
    Chuks could fill in there. I can't believe he's gone.
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,591
    Fullah at LWB is the obvious solution.

    It got shot down in the match thread but Bell would surely be better there than TC and you have Lloyd, Gough and Burke in a back three or you switch to a back four and have Bell at LB and Jones and Burke at CB.

    There are better solutions than TC there. 

    There must also be players in the academy set-up that are worth a look at such a long-standing issue. 
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,892
    Josh Edwards will be fit pretty soon, so don’t see the panic 
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,591
    Rothko said:
    Josh Edwards will be fit pretty soon, so don’t see the panic 
    It’s not necessarily panic but if Edwards goes down again we’re back in the same situation. 
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,536
    If we're allowed injured players - 

    Apter Ramsay Jones Bell Edwards 

    Currently 

    Bree Gough Jones Bell Fullah 
  • Gisappointed
    Gisappointed Posts: 1,085
    fenaddick said:
    If we’re allowed to have injured players then 

    Bree/Apter Ramsay Jones Bell Edwards

    If it’s what we have available now then 

    Bree Gough Jones Bell Fullah 
    Fullah is a right footed midfielder.
  • sammy391
    sammy391 Posts: 3,912
    Surely rousillion must be near fit enough? If there’s no interest in him playing, why is he travelling with the squad! 
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,591
    fenaddick said:
    If we’re allowed to have injured players then 

    Bree/Apter Ramsay Jones Bell Edwards

    If it’s what we have available now then 

    Bree Gough Jones Bell Fullah 
    Fullah is a right footed midfielder.
    He is. And he’s not a long-term solution but he did well there at Birmingham.

  • Sponsored links:



  • aso914
    aso914 Posts: 237
    sammy391 said:
    Surely rousillion must be near fit enough? If there’s no interest in him playing, why is he travelling with the squad! 
    Allegedly he’s already gone. Not sure if that’s true. 
  • DamoNorthStand
    DamoNorthStand Posts: 11,281
    Rothko said:
    Josh Edwards will be fit pretty soon, so don’t see the panic 

    Will he? I hadn't heard confirmation of that but great news if true.
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,892
    Rothko said:
    Josh Edwards will be fit pretty soon, so don’t see the panic 

    Will he? I hadn't heard confirmation of that but great news if true.
    Just what Jones said last week that, gave the impression that he was pretty close
  • sammy391
    sammy391 Posts: 3,912
    aso914 said:
    sammy391 said:
    Surely rousillion must be near fit enough? If there’s no interest in him playing, why is he travelling with the squad! 
    Allegedly he’s already gone. Not sure if that’s true. 
    Was at the game today, running on the pitch with Karoy before the game.
    whether That signals that he is off, as is the rumour with Karoy, I don’t know! 
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,488
    The key for me is, if we are playing an attacking wing back on the left it has to be Bell at LCB. Gilly will be good enough with an Edwards/Bell at LWB.

    But with Edwards out and Bell's fitness issues meaning he isn't really an option at LWB right now. 

    So I would go with

    Bree, Burke (Gough), Jones, Bell, Apter.

    I rate TC but I think Apter has that little bit more about him defensively. TC would be great off the bench and as a rotation in the attacking roles. A LWB he is not. Ramsay obviously comes in as soon as he's fit, as does Edwards.

    In January we need at least 2 defenders, assuming Bree stays or 3 if he doesn't. 
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,948
    fenaddick said:
    If we’re allowed to have injured players then 

    Bree/Apter Ramsay Jones Bell Edwards

    If it’s what we have available now then 

    Bree Gough Jones Bell Fullah 
    Fullah is a right footed midfielder.
    But played at wing back on both sides for the u21s plenty of times.

    He’s also pretty much as two footed as you could be. I’ve seen people claim he’s left footed.

    He was interviewed after an u21 game and said he doesn’t know which foot is his strongest (or along those lines).
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 8,296
    i would have played fullah there and kept TC up top or in the hole 
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,747
    Today I would have gone:

    Bree Burke Jones Bell

    With 2 holding midfielders in front of them in Anderson and Coventry, TC, Carey, Fullah behind Kelman

    If everyone's fit

    Ramsay Burke Jones Bell Edwards 


  • charltonbob
    charltonbob Posts: 8,361
    DOUCHER said:
    i would have played fullah there and kept TC up top or in the hole 

  • The answer is so blindly obvious we can just close the thread after i share the correct answer. We have to go to a back 4, we just dont have the personel to stick with the back 5 and anyone we could recall wouldnt be of the required quality either. So its a back 4 - Bell (until Edwards is back), Jones, Ramsay, Bree. When edwards is back have Jones and Bell in centre and move Ramsay to RB, even if we dont move ramsay to RB just give us so much more options.

    The either go 4-5-1 if we need to accept we are going to have to flood the midfield when playing better teams or go 4-3-3 at home or where we can get a win. Its important to remember that defending isnt just the defences job and our shape at times this season in midfield has been dreadful.

  • Sponsored links:



  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 13,847
    Anyone wanting Ramsay as a CB in a back four needs their head checking 
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,754
    The answer is so blindly obvious we can just close the thread after i share the correct answer. We have to go to a back 4, we just dont have the personel to stick with the back 5 and anyone we could recall wouldnt be of the required quality either. So its a back 4 - Bell (until Edwards is back), Jones, Ramsay, Bree. When edwards is back have Jones and Bell in centre and move Ramsay to RB, even if we dont move ramsay to RB just give us so much more options.

    The either go 4-5-1 if we need to accept we are going to have to flood the midfield when playing better teams or go 4-3-3 at home or where we can get a win. It’s important to remember that defending isnt just the defences job and our shape at times this season in midfield has been dreadful.
    The only thing blindingly obvious is that this is a terrible take. Ramsay and Bell are not back 4 centre backs, they never have been and never will be. It completely removes from their game one of the things they are best at in carrying the ball forward. They are both so key to us being able to progress the ball from the back and in retaining possession, but they aren’t going to be able to do that from CB in a back 4. They are both also brilliant 1v1 defenders in wide areas, Ramsay especially. Playing either of them as a CB in a back 4 is removing most of what makes them brilliant players. 

    If we play a back 4, then Jones and Burke are the only 2 centre backs I’d trust in it. And even both of them are much much better in a back 3. We will continue to play a back 3 though, because it’s what we’ve signed each defender we have to play in and it’s what they are best at 
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 25,039
    edited January 4
    We need to sign a left footed centre half to replace Gillesphey. He’s because a liability . I wouldn’t sign Bree either but if he’s a free then it might be worth it . Burke has hamstrings made of cheese strings which again is puting the team under pressure. 
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,754
    edited January 4
    TC is a better option than Fullah and Apter at LWB, he’s better defensively and Jones knows this which is why he picks him there ahead of them. 

    If you examine the 2 games that Fullah and Apter played, they had much less defensive responsibility tactically than TC has had in a lot of his games 

    Fullah vs Birmingham - Fullah was tasked with pressing high up to Birmingham’s right back Iwata. Gillesphey dealt with the dangerous Patrick Roberts behind. Iwata is not a natural full back, he’s a central midfield player and drifts centrally. So Fullah wasn’t playing a traditional wing back role, he was pressing Iwata and then following him more central. Jones probably picked Fullah for this game because of his central midfield familiarity as he ended up following Iwata centrally a lot in our man to man system 


    Apter vs Oxford - Bizarrely Oxford obviously hadn’t done much research and didn’t try and target our left hand side. They played a back 5 and their RWB was Brodie Spencer who has very little attacking threat, Oxford were also terrible and offered no threat in general. It was a much easier game for Apter defensively than anything TC has had to contend with. Oxford subbed on an attacking RWB later in the game but Apter had already been subbed off for TC by that point. 

    TC isn’t good at wing back, it’s not his position. But he’s had some alright games there, Wrexham away probably his best defensively. If either Apter or Fullah had been chucked in to some of the games TC has been at LWB then they probably would have struggled even more than TC did. Tactically Fullah made more sense against Birmingham and Oxford’s lack of threat meant Apter was fine against Oxford. But both of them would have probably been torn apart by Kabore at Wrexham or by Brittain at Middlesbrough or Van Ewijk at Coventry but TC put a shift in and did ok. 

    I don’t think it’s fair to compare Apter and Fullah’s games at wing back to TC’s, when their games were much easier due to the opposition/tactics of the game 
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,754
    edited January 4
    So to answer your question 

    Everyone fit: Bree, Ramsay, Jones, Bell, Edwards 

    Now: Bree, Gough, Jones, Bell, TC

    I’d also bring back Zach Mitchell and start him over Gough, if we haven’t brought in a new centre back or got Ramsay/Burke fit again by the Sheff Utd game 
  •          Kaminski 
    Ramsey Jones bell Coventry
    Anderson fullah Costello
    Apter kelman Campbell 

    Now  Coventry is very decent positionally and aggressive. He doesn't need to overlap, just move with the ball to in front of the defence. Out of possession/under pressure Campbell and apter revert to wingbacks with Coventry chasing everything Infront of the defence. If we fully behind, sub Ramsey and slot Costello there with the same function as Coventry, and brings leaburn on for a 424. Could even then use carey and kibbs as wide midfielders to replace Campbell and apter , not to get crosses in but to move the ball from out wide, to  centrally to leaburn 
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 29,080
    sammy391 said:
    Surely rousillion must be near fit enough? If there’s no interest in him playing, why is he travelling with the squad! 
    punishment
  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,572
    Go and buy Ethan Pye from Stockport, problem solved.
  • daveydanger
    daveydanger Posts: 1,346
    If I’ve understood the intention of the original post… it’s for any creative ideas for dealing with our current LB predicament? Fans seem to get very upset with Jones for sticking TC at LWB, for example. 

    If so, saying “Edwards” misses the point a bit? 
  • dicktracey
    dicktracey Posts: 328
    Responses show me what I was thinking too .... as much as Gillesphey has credit and was great in League 1 and play off final, I think his Championship football days are behind him.  Sorry to say this, because he has been a great servant to the club.  Perhaps a loan move back to Plymouth in exchange for Alex Mitchell.