Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

MATCH THREAD : Charlton Athletic V Stoke City : Wednesday 11th February 2026 : KO 19:45

17810121326

Comments

  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 22,316
    Dunno what Brum were on about, but Zlatan Dykes looks pretty good
  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 28,094
    Coady fixing the refs comms :)
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 7,192
    Hell doesn’t exist. Sinners will be made to watch Greg Docherty pass and Lyndon Dykes dribble for eternity.
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,791
    That Lowell or whatever his name is has made Chambers look like Grant Basey for pace more than once now.
  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 28,094
    Stoke send it down our right, Ramsay's a bit under pressure by our corner flag but sends it upfield.
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 38,438
    sam3110 said:
    Dunno what Brum were on about, but Zlatan Dykes looks pretty good
    Mainly a sub for them and they play a completely different style to us. Not surprised he looks better for us.
  • aliwibble said:
    Did someone get booked there?
    No..
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 12,654
    aliwibble said:
    Did someone get booked there?
    No
  • Lawal going down could be a touch for us. 
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 7,192
    We’ve kicked that ball out to be nice, not because we were under a shit load of pressure.

  • Sponsored links:



  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 28,094
    Stoke down our right, send it over to  the left, bugger it up, one of their players goes down clutching his thigh and Kaminski very kindly puts it out for a throw.
  • Would be quite happy to get in at HT 0-0 at the moment; Stoke have been growing into the game here, without really creating anything
  • What a load of crap that was to finally clear the ball. Apparently cos of the injury to Stoke player but I doubt that. 
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,950
    This strike pairing is too slow. Stoke can play as high a line as they like. 
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 12,654
    Laddick01 said:
    We’ve kicked that ball out to be nice, not because we were under a shit load of pressure.
    Given TK's previous "clearance" that caused us probs that kick could as easily have been aimed at Dykes.
  • Algarveaddick
    Algarveaddick Posts: 21,443
    Director from Stoke tonight? 
  • vff
    vff Posts: 6,996
    Charlton lost momentum a bit. Stoke have some pace & better passing. Stoke coming to fore. 
  • Yeah that doesnt look good for Lawal, the way he puts his arm up at the advertising hoadings
  • Good half so far from us but we really lack any pace on the counter
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 22,316
    Lawal off, what a touch

  • Sponsored links:



  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 27,060
    Just roll him off the pitch
  • Fumbluff
    Fumbluff Posts: 10,330
    Need a better chance before half time or this will go pear shaped within 10-minutes of the restart I reckon
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 12,654
    Lawal back on his feet but moving very slowly behond the goal ... sub being readied?
  • Hehe... Shithurst have just squandered a two goal lead against Burnley
  • Clem_Snide
    Clem_Snide Posts: 11,926
    Starting to feel like we’ve shot our bolt.

    Same old. Just can’t see where a goal is coming from. We have had chances, but haven’t really worked their keeper.

    Stoke reserves are coming into it more and more as well.
  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 28,094
    Shot of Sichenje having a drink on the bench behind Nathan. Stoke bringing a sub on once he's tied his laces.
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 22,316
    Quick bit of thinking to hammer it to left wing when they're down to 10 and we have a corner out of it
  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 12,654
    Chambers down the left but his cross headed behind.

    Couldn't quite score against 10 men again ...
  • So Stoke have loads of injured players, QPR did as well.

    I thought it was only Charlton who ever had injury problems
  • I don't about that chambers, there was no one in the box..
This discussion has been closed.