Don't wish to darken the mood any more but I have to get this off me chest.
It really pees me off that when there is a disaster that involves massive loss of life our media always feel the need to specifially mention, or concentrate on, the number Brits who died, to make it look somehow worse. Now our foreign secretary is at it:
"This attack in Mumbai is an attack on all of us because democracy in India is vibrant and because Mumbai is one of the world's most diverse cities.
"The most terrible thing is that we do have one confirmed British fatality."
Er, no, Mr Miliband, while our sympathies go to the family of the man who died, I think you'll find the most terrible thing about this is that 130+ more people lost their lives. Twat.
Thank you. Rant over.
0
Comments
Dont see whats wrong with that, as long as they dont ignore the total numbers involved and report the whole story.
Where's the HMS fleet when you need it
I suspect that if no brit had died then this story still would have got a high level of coverage.
It is annoying when there is the reporting that over hypes the british involvement, but I bet in the USA there is much overhyping of their involvemnt and if there were no amercians in the hotels it would not get a bi line in most of their media
I know what I'd like to happen to those "Brits", and it isn't nice. But they'd deserve every bit of it.
Best said couple of paragraphs in this thread
If you're right can you imagine the **** storm that a request for extradition from the Indian authorities would kick up.
Saw the Chief Rabi from New York on TV last night, his speach was very moving.