Kit design is obviously not an exact science. It appears that most accept Charlton's new home kit as being pretty good ... basic, traditional.
There isn't a whole lot that can be with mostly red and white trim. That goes for other clubs, as well.
Two new unusual kit -- retro, they say -- are Hearts and Sperz.
With Hearts looking like a reverse Ajax kit, and Sperz like an old Buffalo Bills shirts.
Do people like them, or think they are rubbish?
Could you see Charlton playing in a Hearts-like kit, with red instead of maroon and the white in the middle?
0
Comments
I feel sick now, dirty.....
Spurs kit is fussy beyond belief. It's a plain white shirt, hard to mess that up but they have.
New home, away and third kits, plus a different sponsored shirt for the cups.
I think A.Madrid did that a few years back.
They were sponsored by one of the big film companies such as Universal and each month had a new film on their shirts.
Who would prefer being able to purchase shirts without a sponsor on the them?
I know someone who only buys national team shirts because they have no advertising on them. He also has a Barcelona shirt and a few training shirts.
But if it has advertising, he isn't interested.
He's out of luck with NASCAR, too.
The major North American professional team sports leagues - NFL, NBA, NHL and MLB - don't have advertising on game jersies, other than the supplier logo. But for how much longer?
Agreed. The new Arsenal shirt however is a breath of fresh air, it's traditional and very smart.
It's reversable, some people like it, I think it's horrible
however i hate the one above
Always liked this one as well:
Hearts: hate
1860 Munich: like a lot. want. edit- for €100, I'm not so sure
Ghana: like
Charlton: like
I like the 1860 away side, dont like the collage of pictures version at all