I know the players vote for the PFA player of the year, but out of all the nominees (although hes very good and made a rapid recovery in hes career) id probably have him 5th or 6th and cant understand that much how he got the award.
Probably being a bit biased towards Parker but from last febuary to this one he would be my no1 choice followed by Nani and Tevez.
Does anyone think he should have won? Dont think he would have if he didnt score those goals against Milan.
0
Comments
I think bale is a gd player but he hasnt been great since the inter milan tie
He wasn't even great before. He's good yes but that game was the only one he's been truly exceptional in. Modric, Dawson, Van der Vaart (arguably, injury prone as he is) all better spurs players over the season in my opinion.
When Parker got young player of the year he'd just signed for Chelsea and barely played a game for them in the second half of the season. All depends on whether the second half of the previous season is taken into account, in which case Bale winning makes more sense.
Agree entirely. I wouldnt have thought Bale will win the Club Player of the Year let alone PFA Player of the Year. Dawson, Gallas and Modric have been our stand out performers this season. Yes, I did say Gallas. As much as I've booed him in the past when he was at Chelsea and Ars*nal, jeez what a player he is. I have to admit it turned my stomach over when we signed him but he's won me over big time. Never in a million years did I think that was going to happen.
Bale has been average at best since since before Christmas but he's been carrying a few knocks and the back injury hampered him for ages and he's only just coming back to full fitness now. To be fair to the lad though, I dont think anyone else in the Prem has had two better performances than his second half against Inter away and the return at WHL, destroying arguably the World's best right-sided full back in Maicon.
I would have given the award to Parker. If West Ham do manage to stay up, its down to him.
I'd have to got for Parker. West Ham have been the worst team in the Premier league for some time and it is only Parker who may keep them up. He's out for a few games now so we'll see just how dependent they are on him, not that we don't know that anyway. I have heard the argument Parker should not win player of the year because he plays for a poor side, who will most likely be relegated this season. Surely this makes his performances even more remarkable considering the standard of player he is surrounded by...Not to mention the manager.
Tevez would be a close second along with Wileshire and Nani.
And there's the problem. Bale's best displays have been in EUROPE. This is surely a domestic award, were it not for those games against Inter i don't think he'd have even made the shortlist.
Also Parker, how can he be nominated for POTY yet didn't even make the team of the season?
And Ashley Cole made the team ahead of Leighton Baines who has scored more and made more assists. I'm convinced players just think "oh who's a good left back" and Cole is the first that springs to mind.
* How much am i getting?
* How much more can i get?
* What new motor will they get me ?
* When will the next blonde bimbo sit on my head?
* What shall i do after 1PM when my "shift " ends?
Puting an X on a card ? i doubt if they could spell X let alone be arsed to do it.
Doesnt seem fair if he got it for his champions league efforts IF it is meant to be decided on Premiership efforts.