Hilarious. Romanov has finally flipped. Surprised it's taken this long. Can you imagine the website team's faces when they were told to stick this up or they'd be out on their ear?
Just picked up on this. What an amazing official statement to be issued by a football club. Clearly written by Romanov because of the appalling terminology used. I would be very worried if I were a Hearts fan.
Clive Walker was nicked for indecent exposure many years ago. He was flashing at schoolgirls as they walked past his house. Baldy Clive is always popping up (lol) as a know f a pundit so there is hope for Thomson yet.
Did Thomson know the ages of the girls concerned?
And Rix was actually shagging an under age girl. He was in his 40s. Thomson is early 20s and merely sent an indecent picture or two to 'vulnerable young girls', who, if they were so innocent, what were they doing on chat sites.
Me?.. I'm more concerned with little girls and boys getting blown to bits in places like Palestine, Libya and Afghanistan
Thomson is early 20s and merely sent an indecent picture or two to 'vulnerable young girls', who, if they were so innocent, what were they doing on chat sites.
That's all right then is it, just to merely send lewd pictures of yourself to kids? I think not and the quote below would indicate that he must have known exactly what he was doing...
From the Daily Record - "Prosecutors at Edinburgh Sheriff Court told last week how he sent pictures of male private parts to two girls aged 12 and 14, asked one of them for sex and made lewd comments about their bodies."
I'd like to think if I were a user of such websites I could tell the difference between a 12 year old and someone of an appropriate age to indulge in my particular kick.
Thomson is early 20s and merely sent an indecent picture or two to 'vulnerable young girls', who, if they were so innocent, what were they doing on chat sites.
That's all right then is it, just to merely send lewd pictures of yourself to kids? I think not and the quote below would indicate that he must have known exactly what he was doing...
From the Daily Record - "Prosecutors at Edinburgh Sheriff Court told last week how he sent pictures of male private parts to two girls aged 12 and 14, asked one of them for sex and made lewd comments about their bodies."
I'd like to think if I were a user of such websites I could tell the difference between a 12 year old and someone of an appropriate age to indulge in my particular kick.
2 things: 1) To compare his offence to that of Rix is not on, there is no comparable severity and 2) I have not read much about the case, is it DEFINITE that he knew the ages of the girls?
I am playing devil's advocate a wee bit here. I am tired of 'moral outrage' engendered by a media which is spilling over with pervs, peepers and poppies of every description. it is called hypocricy
Comments
If that came from us I would worry
Or Italian restaurants?
was that written by a drunken old sweaty at the end of the bar?
what a mess
And you don't wanna even hear about St Mirren and the aliens......................
Sheds a little light on it.
Clive Walker was nicked for indecent exposure many years ago. He was flashing at schoolgirls as they walked past his house. Baldy Clive is always popping up (lol) as a know f a pundit so there is hope for Thomson yet.
Did Thomson know the ages of the girls concerned?
And Rix was actually shagging an under age girl. He was in his 40s. Thomson is early 20s and merely sent an indecent picture or two to 'vulnerable young girls', who, if they were so innocent, what were they doing on chat sites.
Me?.. I'm more concerned with little girls and boys getting blown to bits in places like Palestine, Libya and Afghanistan
That's all right then is it, just to merely send lewd pictures of yourself to kids? I think not and the quote below would indicate that he must have known exactly what he was doing...
From the Daily Record - "Prosecutors at Edinburgh Sheriff Court told last week how he sent pictures of male private parts to two girls aged 12 and 14, asked one of them for sex and made lewd comments about their bodies."
I'd like to think if I were a user of such websites I could tell the difference between a 12 year old and someone of an appropriate age to indulge in my particular kick.
2 things: 1) To compare his offence to that of Rix is not on, there is no comparable severity and 2) I have not read much about the case, is it DEFINITE that he knew the ages of the girls?
I am playing devil's advocate a wee bit here. I am tired of 'moral outrage' engendered by a media which is spilling over with pervs, peepers and poppies of every description. it is called hypocricy
Playing devils advocate over a 20 year old sending pictures of his cock to a girl he knew was 12?
Sickening.