Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Piers Morgan

17891113

Comments

  • Sure you could look back at any national hero and condemn their actions in light of today's attitudes.
  • iaitch said:

    Sure you could look back at any national hero and condemn their actions in light of today's attitudes.

    Yes ........ that's what we are doing
  • holyjo said:

    Im fine with who Churchill was, he was a man of his time, to me and many others he is the greatest ever Brit. End of.

    Fair enough ......... but to me and many others he was not the greatest ever Brit . End of.

    I'd probably say Brunel, Newton and Darwin are greater to me but i have massive admiration for War time Churchill.
  • I’ve seen it all now. “Churchill was a shit who got lucky”.
  • I’ve seen it all now. “Churchill was a shit who got lucky”.

    Who said that?
  • holyjo said:

    Its beyond belief. Seems to be wrong now to be proud of being British. You can't without being called a racist or whatever. Few decades ago people like that ginger kid would be put into sectioning. Now they've got a platform to spout utter sh!t and it's infecting snowflakes at a rate of knots. Scary stuff

    I am very proud of lots of things to do with being British.

    I've not however been a big fan of Eugenics , using the army to attack civilians , or racial supremacism . You are right that in the past you might be sectioned or imprisoned for expressing such views. On occasions that's how people in those days dealt with legitimate challenge or opposition.

    I'm sorry that a challenge to your world view is so scary ......... perhaps you are more of a snowflake than those you accuse
    It's not scary HolyJo it's terrifying. No need to apologise. I'm sure there will be another topic you'll be offended by next week.
  • Uboat said:

    holyjo said:

    se9addick said:

    iainment said:

    I really question that Attlee gave the order to bomb Dresden because Churchill was away.
    I'm sure Churchill was still running every main decision and was on the end of a telephone.
    Agree that Churchill was a man of his time and his upper class upbringing and as soon as the best 6 years of his life were over, was rejected by the people who realized that he was a war leader 1st and foremost.
    He did get another go at being Prime minister 1951 to 55 because of the slow progress after the war for one last swan song.
    An erratic career for most of his political life and his imperialism belief's but many held these views back in the late 19th and early 20th century.

    Churchill can't be Judged from the 21st century without understanding the mores of the times he lived in.

    Then nor can Hitler, Stalin, or any other leader who rode the tide of the beliefs of the society they were in.
    Everyone is moulded by their experiences and everyone should be judged subsequently by the new historians. This leads to revisionism of the left and right but there are few absolute interpretations of the past. Having new understandings and theories gives dynamism to the past that passive acceptance to established history can't.
    FWIW I think Churchill was a shit who got lucky. Most of his ideas previous to WWII were disastrous failures or polarised people.
    Gallipoli, getting troops in on the Welsh miners etc. However in WWII the thing I admire him for is understanding that Britain wasn't able to win the war without major allies. He was good at cultivating them and when the US and the USSR came in good at dealing with them.
    I disagree with that part - Hitler’s actions and his motivations were utterly reprehensible at the time and by the standards of the time. I wouldn’t put Churchill anywhere near that category.

    Just because we can’t judge people of the past by today’s standards doesn’t mean we can’t judge them by any standards.


    Churchill cannot and should not be put in anywhere near that category however he was guilty of lots of things including the following

    Allowing hundreds of thousands of Indians to starve to death
    Supporting Chemical warfare against defenceless tribes in the middle east
    Supporting Eugenics
    Supporting Racial hierarchies
    He Wanted To Use ‘Keep England White’ as a Slogan
    He Covered Up The Katyn Massacre
    Send the army in to attack Welsh protesters who were starving
    His admirers have to either deny that those things happened or admit that they're fine with them, which is why they choose to put their fingers in their ears and keep shouting.
    No, they don't.

    People can admire his achievements (of which there are many) and still recognise his failings (of which there are many).

    I used the word 'admirers' because I was trying to be polite.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Uboat said:

    I’ve seen it all now. “Churchill was a shit who got lucky”.

    Who said that?
    Somewhere in a post on page 10
  • holyjo said:

    Its beyond belief. Seems to be wrong now to be proud of being British. You can't without being called a racist or whatever. Few decades ago people like that ginger kid would be put into sectioning. Now they've got a platform to spout utter sh!t and it's infecting snowflakes at a rate of knots. Scary stuff

    I am very proud of lots of things to do with being British.

    I've not however been a big fan of Eugenics , using the army to attack civilians , or racial supremacism . You are right that in the past you might be sectioned or imprisoned for expressing such views. On occasions that's how people in those days dealt with legitimate challenge or opposition.

    I'm sorry that a challenge to your world view is so scary ......... perhaps you are more of a snowflake than those you accuse
    It's not scary HolyJo it's terrifying. No need to apologise. I'm sure there will be another topic you'll be offended by next week.
    Seriously, re-read the last two pages. You are the only offended person on here.
  • Uboat said:

    I’ve seen it all now. “Churchill was a shit who got lucky”.

    Who said that?
    ianment on the previous page.
  • Uboat said:

    I’ve seen it all now. “Churchill was a shit who got lucky”.

    Who said that?
    Somewhere in a post on page 10

    Uboat said:

    I’ve seen it all now. “Churchill was a shit who got lucky”.

    Who said that?
    ianment on the previous page.
    So he did. Thanks.
  • edited January 2019

    holyjo said:

    Its beyond belief. Seems to be wrong now to be proud of being British. You can't without being called a racist or whatever. Few decades ago people like that ginger kid would be put into sectioning. Now they've got a platform to spout utter sh!t and it's infecting snowflakes at a rate of knots. Scary stuff

    I am very proud of lots of things to do with being British.

    I've not however been a big fan of Eugenics , using the army to attack civilians , or racial supremacism . You are right that in the past you might be sectioned or imprisoned for expressing such views. On occasions that's how people in those days dealt with legitimate challenge or opposition.

    I'm sorry that a challenge to your world view is so scary ......... perhaps you are more of a snowflake than those you accuse
    It's not scary HolyJo it's terrifying. No need to apologise. I'm sure there will be another topic you'll be offended by next week.
    Facts really do matter @AdTheAddicK . I'm not offended and have not said I am offended - As a matter of fact I disagreed ( that's different being offended) with the original poster , our friend @Greenie who was , at least as far as I could make out offended himself with the young chap from the SNP.
  • Uboat said:

    holyjo said:

    Its beyond belief. Seems to be wrong now to be proud of being British. You can't without being called a racist or whatever. Few decades ago people like that ginger kid would be put into sectioning. Now they've got a platform to spout utter sh!t and it's infecting snowflakes at a rate of knots. Scary stuff

    I am very proud of lots of things to do with being British.

    I've not however been a big fan of Eugenics , using the army to attack civilians , or racial supremacism . You are right that in the past you might be sectioned or imprisoned for expressing such views. On occasions that's how people in those days dealt with legitimate challenge or opposition.

    I'm sorry that a challenge to your world view is so scary ......... perhaps you are more of a snowflake than those you accuse
    It's not scary HolyJo it's terrifying. No need to apologise. I'm sure there will be another topic you'll be offended by next week.
    Seriously, re-read the last two pages. You are the only offended person on here.
    You sound offended Uboat. Have some time in your safe space
  • Churchill was a great leader when we most needed one. But that doesn't mean he didn't make mistakes or have views that by today's standards are pretty reprehensible. Both can be true at once.
  • Uboat said:

    holyjo said:

    Its beyond belief. Seems to be wrong now to be proud of being British. You can't without being called a racist or whatever. Few decades ago people like that ginger kid would be put into sectioning. Now they've got a platform to spout utter sh!t and it's infecting snowflakes at a rate of knots. Scary stuff

    I am very proud of lots of things to do with being British.

    I've not however been a big fan of Eugenics , using the army to attack civilians , or racial supremacism . You are right that in the past you might be sectioned or imprisoned for expressing such views. On occasions that's how people in those days dealt with legitimate challenge or opposition.

    I'm sorry that a challenge to your world view is so scary ......... perhaps you are more of a snowflake than those you accuse
    It's not scary HolyJo it's terrifying. No need to apologise. I'm sure there will be another topic you'll be offended by next week.
    Seriously, re-read the last two pages. You are the only offended person on here.
    You sound offended Uboat. Have some time in your safe space
    You're nor going to get it, are you.
  • Sponsored links:


  • holyjo said:

    holyjo said:

    Its beyond belief. Seems to be wrong now to be proud of being British. You can't without being called a racist or whatever. Few decades ago people like that ginger kid would be put into sectioning. Now they've got a platform to spout utter sh!t and it's infecting snowflakes at a rate of knots. Scary stuff

    I am very proud of lots of things to do with being British.

    I've not however been a big fan of Eugenics , using the army to attack civilians , or racial supremacism . You are right that in the past you might be sectioned or imprisoned for expressing such views. On occasions that's how people in those days dealt with legitimate challenge or opposition.

    I'm sorry that a challenge to your world view is so scary ......... perhaps you are more of a snowflake than those you accuse
    It's not scary HolyJo it's terrifying. No need to apologise. I'm sure there will be another topic you'll be offended by next week.
    Facts really do matter @AdTheAddicK . I'm not offended and have not said I am offended - As a matter of fact I disagreed ( that's different being offended) with the original poster , our friend @Greenie who was , at least as far as I could make out offended himself with the young chap from the SNP.
    How could you not be offended by the state of that hair.
  • Uboat said:

    Uboat said:

    holyjo said:

    Its beyond belief. Seems to be wrong now to be proud of being British. You can't without being called a racist or whatever. Few decades ago people like that ginger kid would be put into sectioning. Now they've got a platform to spout utter sh!t and it's infecting snowflakes at a rate of knots. Scary stuff

    I am very proud of lots of things to do with being British.

    I've not however been a big fan of Eugenics , using the army to attack civilians , or racial supremacism . You are right that in the past you might be sectioned or imprisoned for expressing such views. On occasions that's how people in those days dealt with legitimate challenge or opposition.

    I'm sorry that a challenge to your world view is so scary ......... perhaps you are more of a snowflake than those you accuse
    It's not scary HolyJo it's terrifying. No need to apologise. I'm sure there will be another topic you'll be offended by next week.
    Seriously, re-read the last two pages. You are the only offended person on here.
    You sound offended Uboat. Have some time in your safe space
    You're nor going to get it, are you.
    No I do get it. I just don't see why people need to shot a very iconic British leader down. He had his problems we all do. I'm sure we would be watching Charlton compete in the bundesliga, without him and others. I just feel people need something to get offended by and there only happy when there offended.
  • holyjo said:

    Uboat said:

    Uboat said:

    holyjo said:

    Its beyond belief. Seems to be wrong now to be proud of being British. You can't without being called a racist or whatever. Few decades ago people like that ginger kid would be put into sectioning. Now they've got a platform to spout utter sh!t and it's infecting snowflakes at a rate of knots. Scary stuff

    I am very proud of lots of things to do with being British.

    I've not however been a big fan of Eugenics , using the army to attack civilians , or racial supremacism . You are right that in the past you might be sectioned or imprisoned for expressing such views. On occasions that's how people in those days dealt with legitimate challenge or opposition.

    I'm sorry that a challenge to your world view is so scary ......... perhaps you are more of a snowflake than those you accuse
    It's not scary HolyJo it's terrifying. No need to apologise. I'm sure there will be another topic you'll be offended by next week.
    Seriously, re-read the last two pages. You are the only offended person on here.
    You sound offended Uboat. Have some time in your safe space
    You're nor going to get it, are you.
    No I do get it. I just don't see why people need to shot a very iconic British leader down. He had his problems we all do. I'm sure we would be watching Charlton compete in the bundesliga, without him and others. I just feel people need something to get offended by and there only happy when there offended.
    Who the F*** offended apart from you.

    This is people disagreeing about WC place in history. History is written by the winners so that's why there is a disparity of views. I am not offended that @Greenie sees the world very differently to me on this issue. I happen to disagree with him but because I am a grown up I can disagree with people an not be offended by their views. Blimey this is hard graft
    Welcome to the internet, a fascinating place that makes reasoned debate impossible.

  • Uboat said:

    Uboat said:

    holyjo said:

    Its beyond belief. Seems to be wrong now to be proud of being British. You can't without being called a racist or whatever. Few decades ago people like that ginger kid would be put into sectioning. Now they've got a platform to spout utter sh!t and it's infecting snowflakes at a rate of knots. Scary stuff

    I am very proud of lots of things to do with being British.

    I've not however been a big fan of Eugenics , using the army to attack civilians , or racial supremacism . You are right that in the past you might be sectioned or imprisoned for expressing such views. On occasions that's how people in those days dealt with legitimate challenge or opposition.

    I'm sorry that a challenge to your world view is so scary ......... perhaps you are more of a snowflake than those you accuse
    It's not scary HolyJo it's terrifying. No need to apologise. I'm sure there will be another topic you'll be offended by next week.
    Seriously, re-read the last two pages. You are the only offended person on here.
    You sound offended Uboat. Have some time in your safe space
    You're nor going to get it, are you.
    No I do get it. I just don't see why people need to shot a very iconic British leader down. He had his problems we all do. I'm sure we would be watching Charlton compete in the bundesliga, without him and others. I just feel people need something to get offended by and there only happy when there offended.
    It's a shame you didn't start with that then instead of mad rant about how scary you find modern life.
  • Uboat said:

    Uboat said:

    Uboat said:

    holyjo said:

    Its beyond belief. Seems to be wrong now to be proud of being British. You can't without being called a racist or whatever. Few decades ago people like that ginger kid would be put into sectioning. Now they've got a platform to spout utter sh!t and it's infecting snowflakes at a rate of knots. Scary stuff

    I am very proud of lots of things to do with being British.

    I've not however been a big fan of Eugenics , using the army to attack civilians , or racial supremacism . You are right that in the past you might be sectioned or imprisoned for expressing such views. On occasions that's how people in those days dealt with legitimate challenge or opposition.

    I'm sorry that a challenge to your world view is so scary ......... perhaps you are more of a snowflake than those you accuse
    It's not scary HolyJo it's terrifying. No need to apologise. I'm sure there will be another topic you'll be offended by next week.
    Seriously, re-read the last two pages. You are the only offended person on here.
    You sound offended Uboat. Have some time in your safe space
    You're nor going to get it, are you.
    No I do get it. I just don't see why people need to shot a very iconic British leader down. He had his problems we all do. I'm sure we would be watching Charlton compete in the bundesliga, without him and others. I just feel people need something to get offended by and there only happy when there offended.
    It's a shame you didn't start with that then instead of mad rant about how scary you find modern life.
    Dived in the deep end didn't I
  • Saw 77 new posts and thought Morgan had changed his mind on Greggs vegan sausage roll!
  • I thought he'd popped his clogs.

    I hope this has been linked from the argument thread.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!