The poet asks three questions. All are to be answered negatively, putting to rest the misconceived theory that Blake was a proponent of Jesus having visited England in ancient times. Clearly, since Jerusalem was NOT built in England, then it stands to reason that NONE of the questions are to be answered in the affirmative. Blake\'s message is that England was too far away from Christ, and that it is now a foresaken land due to man\'s exploitation of man (the \"Satanic Mills\"). Blake was a radical revolutionary. Although the religious establishment would argue that Jerusalem will only be built on Christ\'s return, Blake goes against this, and exhorts people to build Jerusalem HERE AND NOW. Jerusalem won\'t come simply by waiting for Christ - Jerusalem will be built by the efforts of individuals pursuing the \"mental fight\", i.e. through social action. This is the reason why many conservative religious leaders don\'t like this poem. It argues that it\'s not enough to wait for the next life, that one must seek social change now (something that the ruling class does not want).
Maybe not a good anthem with this government in charge!!
I never realised this - I always thought it was a stupid song because the answer to the first line was 'no'.
Lot's of Churches have banned it because they realise that it doesn't glorify god but most happily think it does and it is a rousing tune. Didn't England use this as our anthem in 2000 Euros?
The poet asks three questions. All are to be answered negatively, putting to rest the misconceived theory that Blake was a proponent of Jesus having visited England in ancient times. Clearly, since Jerusalem was NOT built in England, then it stands to reason that NONE of the questions are to be answered in the affirmative. Blake\'s message is that England was too far away from Christ, and that it is now a foresaken land due to man\'s exploitation of man (the \"Satanic Mills\"). Blake was a radical revolutionary. Although the religious establishment would argue that Jerusalem will only be built on Christ\'s return, Blake goes against this, and exhorts people to build Jerusalem HERE AND NOW. Jerusalem won\'t come simply by waiting for Christ - Jerusalem will be built by the efforts of individuals pursuing the \"mental fight\", i.e. through social action. This is the reason why many conservative religious leaders don\'t like this poem. It argues that it\'s not enough to wait for the next life, that one must seek social change now (something that the ruling class does not want).
Maybe not a good anthem with this government in charge!!
I never realised this - I always thought it was a stupid song because the answer to the first line was 'no'.
Ours is awful but at least it's mercifully short.
I wouldnt call it stupid - it is allegorical, which means the characters places (England) and events are used to symbolize a deeper moral or spiritual meaning
You might want to check the source and validity of Muttley's arguable interpretation of Blakes writings and of the meanings of the song which came a century after the lyrics
The poet asks three questions. All are to be answered negatively, putting to rest the misconceived theory that Blake was a proponent of Jesus having visited England in ancient times. Clearly, since Jerusalem was NOT built in England, then it stands to reason that NONE of the questions are to be answered in the affirmative. Blake\'s message is that England was too far away from Christ, and that it is now a foresaken land due to man\'s exploitation of man (the \"Satanic Mills\"). Blake was a radical revolutionary. Although the religious establishment would argue that Jerusalem will only be built on Christ\'s return, Blake goes against this, and exhorts people to build Jerusalem HERE AND NOW. Jerusalem won\'t come simply by waiting for Christ - Jerusalem will be built by the efforts of individuals pursuing the \"mental fight\", i.e. through social action. This is the reason why many conservative religious leaders don\'t like this poem. It argues that it\'s not enough to wait for the next life, that one must seek social change now (something that the ruling class does not want).
Maybe not a good anthem with this government in charge!!
I never realised this - I always thought it was a stupid song because the answer to the first line was 'no'.
Ours is awful but at least it's mercifully short.
I wouldnt call it stupid - it is allegorical, which means the characters places (England) and events are used to symbolize a deeper moral or spiritual meaning
You might want to check the source and validity of Muttley's arguable interpretation of Blakes writings and of the meanings of the song which came a century after the lyrics
It is arguable because it was played at the Royal Wedding so establishemnt like it. Having said that many churches have banned it - and that is because the more you study the lyrics the more the interpretation I have given rings true. Why would Blake mention satanic mills - he is inviting the listener/reader to build a new Jerusalem.
Muttley mate, it stirs up bad memories to be fair. I’m not too proud to say I resented her talent. I became jealous and competitive. Eventually, I spent a fortune on pickled eggs and would spend the whole night in my garden shed farting me a*se off desperately trying to carry a tune. Days became weeks and then I finally mastered Run, Rabbit, Run, Rabbit Run, Run, Run.
I felt I was finally her equal and our love blossomed. We formed a double act and toured all the leading venues for bodily function double acts – Workington Men’s Club; British Legion Hall, Stockport; Dewsbury Function Centre. You name it, we played it. Life was good and then…
…It happened. We were playing a kid’s birthday party in Clacton and I was getting a few pre-performance tummy rumbles. I just put it down to nerves. But I was wrong. Badly wrong.
Half way through our medley of Frank Sinatra hits I tried to hit a nigh note and followed through in the middle of Strangers in the Night. It was awful. I waddled off stage like a duck with a cucumber up its jacksy.
That was it. She stormed off and didn’t speak to me again. I tried to carry on as a solo act. But at my next show in Skegness, I was constantly heckled and I had a request for Strangers in the Sh*te from some joker.
In fairness it was all very traumatic at the end of the day. I ended up in The Priory. Sad times to be fair.
Yeah Muse, I know just what you mean. ~Exactly the same thing happened to me in the late 90's. I had a request for Brown Moon and tried to save the night with Frank's Accidents will Happen, to no avail.
If it's an alternative to God save the Queen as National Anthems your looking for, then may I suggest 'I vow to thee my country' as sung by the delectable and Welsh Kathryn Jenkins...
If it's an alternative to God save the Queen as National Anthems your looking for, then may I suggest 'I vow to thee my country' as sung by the delectable and Welsh Kathryn Jenkins...
Absolutely fantastic hymn/anthem. I would love it if that or Jerusalem became the anthem for the football team.
Comments
2 I like ours but the Sex Pistols version should be played
Ours is awful but at least it's mercifully short.
You might want to check the source and validity of Muttley's arguable interpretation of Blakes writings and of the meanings of the song which came a century after the lyrics
Never fails to give me goosebumps B as I face the flag & sing it.
Exactly what I think anyone's anthem should do for them.
~Exactly the same thing happened to me in the late 90's. I had a request for Brown Moon and tried to save the night with Frank's Accidents will Happen, to no avail.
People used to faint at my version of In Through the Outdoor