Players Marks: Charlton 2-1 Leicester

Cafcspud

Hamer - 8
Solly - 8
Morrison - 9
Cort - 8
Wiggins - 7.5
Pritchard - 9
Hollands - 7
Stephens - 7
Jackson - 6
Kermorgant - 8
BWP - 8.5

stilladdicted

Hamer 7.5 Solly 7
Morrison 9 MOM
Cort 7.5
Wiggins 7.5
Pritchard 7
Hollands 7
StephenS 7
Jackson 6.5
Kermorgant 8
BWP 9

cafc4ever

Hamer 7.5
Solly 7.5
Morrison 8
Cort 7.5
Wiggins 7.5
Pritchard 7
Hollands 7
StephenS 7
Jackson 6.5
Kermorgant 8
BWP 9

dajo

Hamer 8
Solly 7.5
Morrison 8.5
Cort 8
Wiggins 7
Pritchard 8
Hollands 7
Stephens 7
Jackson 7
Kermorgant 8
BWP 8.5

nth_london_addick

Hamer - 8
Solly - 7.5
Morrison - 9 MOM
Cort - 7.5
Wiggins - 7.5
Pritchard - 8
Hollands - 8
Stephens - 7
Jackson - 7
Kermorgant - 8
BWP - 9

Covered End

Hamer - 8
Solly - 7.5
Morrison - 9 MOM
Cort - 8
Wiggins - 7.5
Pritchard - 8
Hollands - 8
Stephens - 7.5
Jackson - 7.5
Kermorgant - 8
BWP - 8.5

[Deleted User]

Addickted4life said:

@owenwiththehat you forgot Hamer mate.

oh ill give hime a 7

kimbo

Hamer 8
Solly 7.5
Morrison 8
Cort 7.5
Wiggins 7.5
Pritchard 8.5
Hollands 7.5
Stephens 7.5
Jackson 7.5
Kermorgant 9
BWP 8.5

classicalmusicaddick

I absolutely love that people are giving completely different and often opposite scores to each other. Also, I don't really understand all these 9 and 10 scores...

Covered End

10's I agree. But 9's are because it was their best display in a Charlton shirt & you can't do much better than that.

masicat

One person scored Stephens higher than BWP. Suggests too much time spent in the Oak beforehand, or a sense of humour. Easy to catergorise - SUPERB ( bwp, Morrison ) Very good ( Kermongant, Pritchard, Solly ,Wiggins , Hamer ) Good ( Hollands and Cort ) could do better ( Stephens, Jackson )

MuttleyCAFC

We all look for different things so I may pick up on something that somebody else doesn't and visa versa. We also tend to mark higher than the papers do as we are supporters - as long as the marks are consistent then I can't see a problem.

I find it strange that some people didn't have BWP as M.O.T.M but I think Stephens had a very good game and can understand why others may have thought he wasn't so influential.

StigThundercock

Hamer 8
Solly 7 his lack of size an issue for the first time - performance fine
Morrison 8
Cort 8
Wiggins 6 first time he's looked fallible or caught for pace
Pritchard 8 turning into a terrific player
Hollands 8
Stephens 5.5 didn't perform 2nd half at all, 1st half the best he's had at charlton
Jackson 6.5 poor b"gg€r got whacked hard often and early
Kermorgant 8
BWP 8

Wilson n/a (under 30mins) nerves? ball bounced off him horribly every time
Kerkar n/a slow
cook n/a lively intelligent

lancashire lad

this thread is now closed for marks

masicat

I thought Stephens was poor. I am predicting he will lose his place before December. However, not sure who will take it as Kerkar is curates egg........