Your like/lol/abuse count
Comments
-
There was this guy who wore a Yellow shirt, yellow shorts, yellow socks and yellow boots. I called him Banana Man and got 3 abuse strikes!1
-
Determined to get that count up eh wheresmyticket? ;-)Wheresmeticket? said:
I already did that one, Leroy. Except I just called everyone a c***.Leroy Ambrose said:533 Like
313 LOL
1 Abuse
1 Promote
Feck me, does that mean I'm more likeable than funny?
Also can't believe I've only got one abuse flag - I would have thought all the dimwitted, Daily Mail reading, knuckle-dragging, UKIP-voting, poor-spelling, right-wing loons on here would be frothing at the mouth to flag me up...
1 -
Some of the posts I see get flagged on here do not warrant it.0
-
Gave this a LOL, but took it off as I realised it was the Flag I was LOLling at! :-)The Red Robin said:Some of the posts I see get flagged on here do not warrant it.
2 -
Red Robin did sit that one right up. There's some proper jokers on the site :-)0
-
2k like
1.3k lol
3 abuse
Think people laugh at me rather than with me1 -
Like:319paulie8290 said:Like:108
Lol:55
Abuse:4
I upset a few people on saturday lol
Lol:280
Abuse:5 Someone joined the party late with that extra abuse0 -
Like 42
Lol 16
Not bad considering I reckon I've only had 50 odd posts in the last year, quality not quantity folks!1 -
0-promote
102-like
85-lol
9-abuse
My abuse flags were 1 on saying NLA seems to have a brilliant tattoo artist
6 on a tongue in cheek 'london is an awful city comment.
1 on saying 'RIP ronnie Biggs... Dead criminal yay'
And the only one I can actually understand was mistaking This post r.e Danny green;
Robbo got zero flags and I got about 12 however the majority were rescinded when I found out that DG was actually doing a really nice thing.Robbo on the wing said:
Surprised he got the right houseT.C.E said:
I then had to make the following apology.Dazzler21 said:Lucy had fallen asleep before Danny Green delivered any end product.
A few flags were then rescinded.Dazzler21 said:
Sorry all wasn't aware of this!T.C.E said:Young Lucy is in the last stages of a terminal illness, I'm sure any references to this beautiful young lady in addition to Opinions on Danny Greens footballing skills
should be kept separate.
Apologies for any offence caused by this:
Feel a bit of a dick now!Dazzler21 said:Lucy had fallen asleep before Danny Green delivered any end product.
I'm not sure how much I agree with flagging at the moment!0 -
Sponsored links:
-
26 likes
30 Lols
01 abuse
I received abuse for speaking of the taboo subject that is the CL clique.
0 -
246 likes
282 Lots of loves
1 completely unjustified abuse flag from the time when I was asked which one in the image was new manager, Jose Riga, and I suggested he was the one with Roland's hand stuck up his arse.
(The subtle implication that he was Mr Duchatalet's new ventriloquist's dummy proved later to be entirely innacurate but was hardly abusive.)
3 -
Friend or Defoe once flagged me for saying their was a pitch inspection at 11am for the Wednesday game. Really?3
-
I got a flag for my earwig joke. Strange.0
-
What was the earwig joke AA ?AddicksAddict said:I got a flag for my earwig joke. Strange.
0 -
Another way to gauge the quality is to divide the number of comments by your points count (like count - minus abuse) to give a figure.
636 Like / 147 LOL / 1 abuse / comments 2074
2074 / 635= 3.26
That makes the quality score as 3.26.
The lower the score the higher your rating. Simple.
0 -
7.590
-
I've got 0 abuse... Go on I dare ya.0
-
Is an abuse equal to a like?0
-
1 promoteValleyGary said:2k like
1.3k lol
3 abuse
Think people laugh at me rather than with me
172 likes
172 lols
Yeah @ValleyGary we'll call it a draw! :-)
1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Well that is me fecked then. /8 abusesvff said:Another way to gauge the quality is to divide the number of comments by your points count (like count - minus abuse) to give a figure.
636 Like / 147 LOL / 1 abuse / comments 2074
2074 / 635= 3.26
That makes the quality score as 3.26.
The lower the score the higher your rating. Simple.0 -
Soapy Jones - 514 LOL / 218 likes / 8 abusesoapy_jones said:
Well that is me fecked then. /8 abusesvff said:Another way to gauge the quality is to divide the number of comments by your points count (like count - minus abuse) to give a figure.
636 Like / 147 LOL / 1 abuse / comments 2074
2074 / 635= 3.26
That makes the quality score as 3.26.
The lower the score the higher your rating. Simple.
Soapy Jones - 3378 posts / 218 - 8 = 16
There is 514 LOL. There must be a way to fit that in.0 -
What about promotes? Count for anything?vff said:
Soapy Jones - 514 LOL / 218 likes / 8 abusesoapy_jones said:
Well that is me fecked then. /8 abusesvff said:Another way to gauge the quality is to divide the number of comments by your points count (like count - minus abuse) to give a figure.
636 Like / 147 LOL / 1 abuse / comments 2074
2074 / 635= 3.26
That makes the quality score as 3.26.
The lower the score the higher your rating. Simple.
Soapy Jones - 3378 posts / 218 - 8 = 16
There is 514 LOL. There must be a way to fit that in.0 -
Promotes definitely get a good score as they are as rare as Charlton Athletic promotions.
0 -
I have 617 likes and 1 promote (no abuse) but 5000 odd posts so what's the calculation? I have a feeling I'm not going to like this game...vff said:Promotes definitely get a good score as they are as rare as Charlton Athletic promotions.
0 -
Actually, that metric doesn't work. "Likes" etc were only introduced this year, therefore anyone that hasn't just signed up will be disadvantaged and those that have been around since the beginning, more so.0
-
Well. 5,000 / 617 = 8.1sadiejane1981 said:
I have 617 likes and 1 promote (no abuse) but 5000 odd posts so what's the calculation? I have a feeling I'm not going to like this game...vff said:Promotes definitely get a good score as they are as rare as Charlton Athletic promotions.
The promote should move up to at least 7.1.
Sadie Jane, the scoring probably would only make good sense as the LOL / Likes have only been around for a while. So maybe many of your comments did not have the opportunity to be appreciated.0 -
It's all in good fun I know but there are some amazing posters on here that as lookout said would score quite low because of the high quantity of posts before the feature, it is a fun feature though, other forums have a star rating system, we have points as our equivalent ;-)0
-
What's the prize ?0
-
Dinner with RolandShootersHillGuru said:What's the prize ?
Charlton Life supporters representative on the board
and a Charlton Life badge
1
