Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Kinsella Junior

Valley11Valley11
in Other Football and Sports
http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/32851338
«1

Comments

  • harveys_gardenerharveys_gardener
    Well we are a bit short of right back cover. Won't be dear.
  • ForeverAddicktedForeverAddickted
    Dont look much like his Dad
  • TelMc32TelMc32
    If he's half the player his dad was, he'll have a very good career.
  • cfgscfgs
    With that shirt and his hairstyle.......is it the 1980s all over again?
  • Fanny FanackapanFanny Fanackapan
    I have a photo of Liam with Kins & c'tee members of NWKA when we sponsored his shirt the first season he joined us.

    Must have been around 3 or 4 then.
  • jimmymelrosejimmymelrose
    ForeverAddickted said:

    Dont look much like his Dad

    I can see the resemblance. Also, it sounds like he playes a bit like him: 'He has energy and enthusiasm is abundance'
  • AddickFC81AddickFC81
    Not so much in the hair but certainly in the facial expresions
  • Lazy_eye_metaphorLazy_eye_metaphor
    Sign him up NOW!
  • Sponsored links:


  • Dazzler21Dazzler21
    Frankie Muniz?
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    Henry Irving said:

    Scored his first goal and the winner today for Walsall.

    Walsall won 2-0 and he got the first ;-)
  • Henry IrvingHenry Irving
    Addick Addict said:

    Henry Irving said:

    Scored his first goal and the winner today for Walsall.

    Walsall won 2-0 and he got the first ;-)
    So he got the winner
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    Henry Irving said:

    Addick Addict said:

    Henry Irving said:

    Scored his first goal and the winner today for Walsall.

    Walsall won 2-0 and he got the first ;-)
    So he got the winner
    No because, had he not scored, Walsall would still have won. Therefore his goal can't be deemed the winner.
  • ForeverAddicktedForeverAddickted
    Addick Addict said:

    Henry Irving said:

    Addick Addict said:

    Henry Irving said:

    Scored his first goal and the winner today for Walsall.

    Walsall won 2-0 and he got the first ;-)
    So he got the winner
    No because, had he not scored, Walsall would still have won. Therefore his goal can't be deemed the winner.
    Plus had Burton equalised... It would have meant nothing
  • guinnessaddickguinnessaddick
    edited October 2015
    He scored the opener, the question is did he punch the air after the win?
  • TalalTalal
    Addick Addict said:

    Henry Irving said:

    Addick Addict said:

    Henry Irving said:

    Scored his first goal and the winner today for Walsall.

    Walsall won 2-0 and he got the first ;-)
    So he got the winner
    No because, had he not scored, Walsall would still have won. Therefore his goal can't be deemed the winner.
    Except a whole different set of events would have taken place had his shot (header or whatever) been missed, so it wouldn't necessarily have finished 1-0.
  • Powell Is PleasantPowell Is Pleasant
    Woah woah woah, let's apply some logic to this:
    The winning goal is the goal that stopped it from being a draw and made it become a win.

    In this case, the first goal of a 2-0 win is definitely the winner.
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    Powell Is Pleasant said:

    Woah woah woah, let's apply some logic to this:
    The winning goal is the goal that stopped it from being a draw and made it become a win.

    In this case, the first goal of a 2-0 win is definitely the winner.

    Yes but, logically, in a 2-0 win the first goal is as irrelevant as the second one, because they would still have won 1-0 had either not been scored. Therefore neither goal is the winning goal.
  • Sponsored links:


  • TelMc32TelMc32
    If the Pope shat in the woods, would that make the bear a Catholic?
  • Powell Is PleasantPowell Is Pleasant
    Addick Addict said:

    Powell Is Pleasant said:

    Woah woah woah, let's apply some logic to this:
    The winning goal is the goal that stopped it from being a draw and made it become a win.

    In this case, the first goal of a 2-0 win is definitely the winner.

    Yes but, logically, in a 2-0 win the first goal is as irrelevant as the second one, because they would still have won 1-0 had either not been scored. Therefore neither goal is the winning goal.
    Your opinion is ugly and wrong.
  • The Red RobinThe Red Robin
    Sign him up.
  • Raith_C_ChattonellRaith_C_Chattonell
    The Peacock lad slipped through the net, lets not make the same mistake again eh?
  • Addick AddictAddick Addict
    Powell Is Pleasant said:

    Addick Addict said:

    Powell Is Pleasant said:

    Woah woah woah, let's apply some logic to this:
    The winning goal is the goal that stopped it from being a draw and made it become a win.

    In this case, the first goal of a 2-0 win is definitely the winner.

    Yes but, logically, in a 2-0 win the first goal is as irrelevant as the second one, because they would still have won 1-0 had either not been scored. Therefore neither goal is the winning goal.
    Your opinion is ugly and wrong.
    Yes but fortunately I am handsome and right.
  • floydroadfaithfullfloydroadfaithfull
    At 1-0 it's still squeaky bum time till the end 2-0 is a comfortable cushion so both goals are as important as each other
  • LargeAddickLargeAddick
    The other team didn't score so, even if Walsall had scored eight, they only needed to score one to win so young Kins did score the winner.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!