Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Other team's new kits

1…810121314

Comments

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,833
    MI6 must be really desperate for funds, if Q is reduced to opening a casino.
  • Gammon
    Gammon Posts: 338
    Pelling1993 said:
    MrOneLung said:
     Southampton’s home kit. 


    Can't put my finger on it, but it looks like a fake shirt
    Think the sponsor looks like a at home print, making it seem fake to me 
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,796
    MrOneLung said:
    Rothko said:
    Honestly don't get what the issue is with RSK on the shirts, owned by a Charlton supporter, simple, not a gambling firm, ticks all the boxes 
    it is just too big - reduce the font by 25% and would be much better
    It’s probably at the maximum size allowed by EFL rules, and it’s fine, if you think Spud Boy in the same space is better, then, no helping available 
  • YTS1978
    YTS1978 Posts: 1,700
    killerandflash said:
    MI6 must be really desperate for funds, if Q is reduced to opening a casino.
    Casino Royale 
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,827
    Rothko said:
    MrOneLung said:
    Rothko said:
    Honestly don't get what the issue is with RSK on the shirts, owned by a Charlton supporter, simple, not a gambling firm, ticks all the boxes 
    it is just too big - reduce the font by 25% and would be much better
    It’s probably at the maximum size allowed by EFL rules, and it’s fine, if you think Spud Boy in the same space is better, then, no helping available 
    no I don't think Spud Boys is a better logo, but doesn't mean I cannot think our shirt would look better with smaller lettering
  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    I think the RSK is fine as is, could be green like the actual logo 
  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,342
    edited July 4
    Rothko said:
    Honestly don't get what the issue is with RSK on the shirts, owned by a Charlton supporter, simple, not a gambling firm, ticks all the boxes 
    I seriously doubt anyone actually minds where the sponsor is based and who they are. I think everyone would agree that it's a positive that it is a Charlton fan sponsoring and not a dodgy sponsor.

    The sponsor logo just doesn't look good, it is a bad looking logo. It would even look better with something as simple as a black outline/trim around the RSK and reduce the size. It would pop more and not be an eye sore on the shirt.
  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,342
    edited July 4
    ForeverAddickted said:
    rChampionship - Ice Lolly FC have arrived for 2526
    Genuinely one of the worst kit sponsors I've ever seen, luckily for Watford fans, their club agree: 




  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 29,020
    edited July 4
    Rothko said:
    Honestly don't get what the issue is with RSK on the shirts, owned by a Charlton supporter, simple, not a gambling firm, ticks all the boxes 

    I would say the general view is the lettering is too big.
    **Edit, @MrOneLung beat me to it.
  • NorthheathAddick
    NorthheathAddick Posts: 4,017
    ElfsborgAddick said:
    MrOneLung said:
     Southampton’s home kit. 


    Very retro from the late 70's early 80's.  

    They'll sell bundles of these.
    Look a whole lot better without that sponsor on it…
  • Sponsored links:



  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,023
    Braziliance said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    rChampionship - Ice Lolly FC have arrived for 2526
    Genuinely one of the worst kit sponsors I've ever seen, luckily for Watford fans, their club agree: 




    Think they'll be looking for a new sponsor after that post , although I totally agree with them.

    Don't know if the Championship is going to be covered by the ban on gambling sponsors from next season?? 
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,796
    Moody Far Eastern gambling firms look shit on shirts, I know the EFL were one of the biggest campaigners against a gambling ban 
  • RC_CAFC
    RC_CAFC Posts: 1,754
    Braziliance said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    rChampionship - Ice Lolly FC have arrived for 2526
    Genuinely one of the worst kit sponsors I've ever seen, luckily for Watford fans, their club agree: 




    Why would anyone buy the branded one 😂
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,942
    Braziliance said:
    Really like Norwich's new kit.

    https://x.com/NorwichCityFC/status/1941044307449840035?t=kcETZGpA3ugFvvfBVhxkGg&s=19

    Very simple, has a collar and the crest & manufacturer are embroided on. 


    That's really nice.

    Watford and Southampton's above are both awful.
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,345
    edited July 4
    Braziliance said:
    Really like Norwich's new kit.

    https://x.com/NorwichCityFC/status/1941044307449840035?t=kcETZGpA3ugFvvfBVhxkGg&s=19

    Very simple, has a collar and the crest & manufacturer are embroided on. 


    I've always liked the Norwich canary yellow, bright green and the 'pretty' badge .. however, what is the point of a collar on  a garment that is essentially a T shirt ?
  • YTS1978
    YTS1978 Posts: 1,700
    edited July 4
    Removing the logo from Watfords shirt don't help it. Southampton's one looks cheap. Norwich have nailed theirs though!

    Edit...haha...I just watched the launch video. Very well played Norwich.
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,454
    It's the blue and white clash with the yellow/red/black of the kit that makes it even worse. Doesn't look terrible if done in suitable colours.


  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,345
    randy andy said:
    It's the blue and white clash with the yellow/red/black of the kit that makes it even worse. Doesn't look terrible if done in suitable colours.


    like the Preston shirt with the sponsors name/logo in a bright contrasting colour. This really brings attention to the sponsor's name, more bang for yer buck so ter speak
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,454
    Lincsaddick said:
    randy andy said:
    It's the blue and white clash with the yellow/red/black of the kit that makes it even worse. Doesn't look terrible if done in suitable colours.


    like the Preston shirt with the sponsors name/logo in a bright contrasting colour. This really brings attention to the sponsor's name, more bang for yer buck so ter speak
    True, but if the fans actively hate it and end up all buying blank tops, it could be argued you're losing as much as you gain from the contrast. Also, as a sponsor you want the fans of the team you're sponsoring to use your services, so making them instantly dislike your brand isn't a smart move
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,345
    randy andy said:
    Lincsaddick said:
    randy andy said:
    It's the blue and white clash with the yellow/red/black of the kit that makes it even worse. Doesn't look terrible if done in suitable colours.


    like the Preston shirt with the sponsors name/logo in a bright contrasting colour. This really brings attention to the sponsor's name, more bang for yer buck so ter speak
    True, but if the fans actively hate it and end up all buying blank tops, it could be argued you're losing as much as you gain from the contrast. Also, as a sponsor you want the fans of the team you're sponsoring to use your services, so making them instantly dislike your brand isn't a smart move
    agreed, after all there are great marketing depts, good ones, bad ones and terrible ones
  • Sponsored links:



  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,023
    Rothko said:
    Moody Far Eastern gambling firms look shit on shirts, I know the EFL were one of the biggest campaigners against a gambling ban 
    Doesn't surprise me , you could have had the 32Red mini league at one point. 
  • Ross
    Ross Posts: 4,408
    https://www.footyheadlines.com/2025/07/new-norwich-city-mock-flowery-kit-marketing.html
  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 29,020
    edited July 4
    North Lower Neil said:
    Braziliance said:
    Really like Norwich's new kit.

    https://x.com/NorwichCityFC/status/1941044307449840035?t=kcETZGpA3ugFvvfBVhxkGg&s=19

    Very simple, has a collar and the crest & manufacturer are embroided on. 


    That's really nice.

    Watford and Southampton's above are both awful.

    As with most Norwich home tops, this one is very nice, particularly that the shirt manufacturer and club badge are embroidered.
    This coupled with not an overpowering sponsor logo covering the shirt.
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 3,281
    Have the massives announced their kit yet?
  • gringo
    gringo Posts: 565
    .
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 35,987
    Braziliance said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    rChampionship - Ice Lolly FC have arrived for 2526
    Genuinely one of the worst kit sponsors I've ever seen, luckily for Watford fans, their club agree: 




    Even though i agree with them it's a strange post from the club though. They've basically said 'we agree our sponsors logo looks shit, we wanted it to be black, we know you hate it so please buy a shirt without it'.

    The sponsor reading that must be pretty angry.
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,023
    edited July 4
    They had a black sponsor for the last 2 seasons with MrQ and now they've rebranded to blue and it just doesn't work. 
  • iaitch
    iaitch Posts: 10,216
    YTS1978 said:
    Removing the logo from Watfords shirt don't help it. Southampton's one looks cheap. Norwich have nailed theirs though!

    Edit...haha...I just watched the launch video. Very well played Norwich.
    Let's hope you're not saying that on Boxing Day.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,833
    Whites Beaconsfield make teeth whitening products. I expect all the Bolton fans to have Instagram smiles this season  :D

    https://whitesbeaconsfield.co.uk/

Categories

“Marketplace”