According to a report in the press (Sunday Times) this weekend, MPs are due to debate a proposal that the William Blake/Hubert Parry penned dirge 'Jerusalem' should replace another dirge 'God Save the Queen' as the English anthem at major sporting events. Call me Dave is reportedly in favour of the errrr motion.
Personally I would prefer 'Land of Hope & Glory' as Jerusalem, the city which should theoretically be built on our green and pleasant land, is a city divided between warring Jews and Palestinians with on-going squabbles and struggles over who owns what piece of dusty scrubland whereupon stands a 'holy' building.
L O H & G is not especially lively though despite the stirring lyrics. Perhaps the 'Okey Cokey', 'My Old Man's a Dustman' or 'I Wanna Hold Your Hand' would be more upbeat and appropriate for modern England
.. any thoughts from CL readers as a bit of light relief from hair shirt wearing, bitter pill swallowing and suicide watching out for loved ones over l'affaire Duchatelet/Meire/Fraeye ?
1
Comments
Failing that, then the theme from The Archers.
The trouble is it's a christian hymn. LOH & G has the same problem for me: too much mention of the fictional religious bloke.
Well, it is the Capital of England.
LoHG is a livelier tune, but I've never felt any identification with it. I can't put my finger on it, but it just doesn't feel right.
In terms of something more modern, how about "London Calling" by the Clash? Good song, clearly English, would piss off northerners....
"A New England" by Billy Bragg?
I guess underlying it there's not the same shared culture amongst the English that there is among Scots or Welsh, so we've been using the British national anthem for sporting events. The nearest we have to something that is would be Jerusalem.
Words are not needed.
Fans could sing along dah-dah-dah-dah style