Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Katrien sacked?

145791030

Comments

  • Davo55
    Davo55 Posts: 7,836
    Ha Ha Ha.

    The club takes it seriously.

    Pity they don't take managing this club more seriously then, isn't it.
  • Hovi's Biscuit
    Hovi's Biscuit Posts: 1,717
    edited February 2016
    Badly written and passive aggressive in tone - presumably KM herself actually wrote that, as it sounds like her?
  • DA9 said:
    Sounds like it is straight from Life of Brian.

    "This document is false and the club is investigating the matter as it is something we take seriously. And he's a very naughty boy
  • LuckyReds
    LuckyReds Posts: 5,866
    Beautiful.
  • A-R-T-H-U-R
    A-R-T-H-U-R Posts: 7,678
    edited February 2016
    cafcfan said:

    RedChaser said:

    cafcfan said:

    From the age of 18 for a year I had a job that required me to sign off 200 or so stock transfer forms a day. My signature quickly changed out of all recognition from a fairly basic writing out of my name to an indecipherable scrawl. (Unless I thought there was anything dubious about the transfer in which case I used to sign off as "Mary Poppins".)

    Never ever considered a 'John Bull' kit then :wink: .
    That would have been good.

    We were provided with an ink pad and one of these to help things along.

    image
    Really handy.
    If your name was 20 Jul 2020, and your signature was a bit, well, blocky.
  • Excellent work.
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,955
    DA9 said:

    Katrien reading Charlton life again (sigh).



  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330
    Should have just acknowledged the humour and moved on.

    Obviously did not have siblings, would have learnt that by the age of 10.
  • Sponsored links:



  • mogodon
    mogodon Posts: 3,406
    WSS said:

    The club is aware of a document that has appeared on Companies House.

    This document is false and the club is investigating the matter as it is something we take seriously.

    Read more (not really - that's it) at http://www.cafc.co.uk/news/article/charlton-statement-companies-house-2945987.aspx#uMcgOQddmeb3fot1.99

    Well, the good news is that this produced communication from the club, so even though (sadly) it turned out to be true, we know they are monitoring social media. and forums.
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,560
    Hilarious stuff. Whoever it was, good work. As AB says 'on Companies House', doesn't even make sense. Who puts this crap out?
  • mogodon
    mogodon Posts: 3,406
    Redrobo said:

    Should have just acknowledged the humour and moved on.

    Obviously did not have siblings, would have learnt that by the age of 10.

    No, it was important she let us know she was cross and sent us to the cyber naughty step. Now, what other similar mischief can we inflict on her?
  • She's such an easy wind up. This really should be fully exploited as the campaign moves forward.
  • SE10Addick
    SE10Addick Posts: 2,963
    Can't believe how easy it is to do all this - https://gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/470441/TM01_V5.0.pdf

    Wish i had thought of it tbh!
  • Goonerhater
    Goonerhater Posts: 12,677
    I fully support all means ( especially the non legal ones)
  • PL54
    PL54 Posts: 10,757
    I can see someone getting in trouble for this.
  • Sponsored links:



  • cafc999
    cafc999 Posts: 4,967
    PL54 said:

    I can see someone getting in trouble for this.

    If the form was posted; which it looks like then it's going to be incredibly hard to pin it on anyone
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    Ah but, are they taking it seriously in good faith?
  • PL54
    PL54 Posts: 10,757
    edited February 2016
    cafc999 said:

    PL54 said:

    I can see someone getting in trouble for this.

    If the form was posted; which it looks like then it's going to be incredibly hard to pin it on anyone
    Aren't these things on line in this age of wonder and awe?
  • PL54 said:

    cafc999 said:

    PL54 said:

    I can see someone getting in trouble for this.

    If the form was posted; which it looks like then it's going to be incredibly hard to pin it on anyone
    Aren't these things on line in this age of wonder and awe?
    They haven't quite abandoned the olden times yet....
  • Hartleypete
    Hartleypete Posts: 4,699
    Very good whoever is involved, the club are investigating,excellent more extra costs for Rolly.
  • Missed It
    Missed It Posts: 2,733
    Why would they even comment on this? Just straighten it out with Companies House - 'nothing to see here' etc. Its just throwing petrol on the bad publicity fire. I hate the grammar police too but that is a horrific piece of writing they've boshed out on the website (in the usual state of panic).

    New comms manager must be thinking WTF have i walked into here!
  • More of this sort of thing is exactly what's needed to make her working life unbearable..

    Great work whoever did it (I think PL54 has to be the main suspect given his attempts above pretending he thinks the form can only be submitted online. Finally, using his Troll Super Powers for good, at last)
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,459
    PL54 said:

    I can see someone getting in trouble for this.

    A lifetime season ticket?

    Poor bas*ard!

  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    edited February 2016
    A bit like the Hatton Garden heist, the perpetrator(s) should get away with it and their enginuity and gusto should be celebrated. Its a big fat well done from me
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    edited February 2016
    .