Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Varney takeover to move Charlton from The Valley (Meire's claims - Varney goes on attack)

1246720

Comments

  • More lies, get out of our club Meire.
  • I am firmly in the 'believe Varney over Meire camp' but playing devil's advovate for a moment I have a distant memory of Peter Varney mooting a new ground in Kent back in the Prem days.

    Could Murray have told her this and she has spun it to her own advantage?

    If so there is a certain irony in the history she detests so much working to her possible advantage.
  • colin1961 said:

    over to you Varney if it's untrue them sue !!!!
    But either the group you were suppose to present had plans that you nothing about or Richard Murray as told KM and RD that this is what will happen with they deal with you ....

    Over to you Reg ....

    image
    As others have said the gift keeps on giving. More gifs like this one please.
  • The fact is, she has no way of knowing what the plan is as she has declined to speak to them! She has made this up and said it to discredit the potential buyers and show the owner in a favourable light and it bites her in the backside as it was obviously going to do if not based on truth. She does this sort of thing far too often.
  • How would she know anything about the deal if she didn't discuss it with him? The woman is just a compulsive liar, she can't help herself.
  • I would suggest she's got this from someone other than Murray.
  • I will be interested in Airmans view.
  • I would suggest she's got this from someone other than Murray.

    airman? cabbles? colin?
  • WSSWSS
    edited June 2016
    It does raise an interesting scenario if anything.

    Not sure what side of the fence I'd fall on if this was a condition to be rid of these incompetents for good and to start looking to a forward-thinking and successful future.
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited June 2016

    How would she know anything about the deal if she didn't discuss it with him? The woman is just a compulsive liar, she can't help herself.

    Because as said above , Murray fed her that line . It's the most plausible explanation other than she just lied ( again ) .
  • We know for certain that she hasn't got it from the people who she accuses this of. How long a list does Duchatrelet need?
  • No smoke without fire.

    Where'd she get that from?

    Varney was only going to be a middle man so who knows?

    She never spoke to Varney, she doesn't know who the buyers were, she is making it up, she's a liar.

    She is also lying about RD not wanting to sell to someone who'd move the club. If someone offered him £50m today he bite their hand off without a second's thought about the Valley, the fans or anyone else.
    Why does she need Varney to tell her who the buyers are?

  • Katrien opens her mouth, and a lie comes out. Just like night follows day. This time though she has potentially made a slanderous claim. If I was Varney, I would be review my options. And I mean legal options.

    If only Katrien had someone on her team with a law background to advise her about making slanderous claims. Oh, hang on....
  • BTW, If done correctly, I do think a move to the Greenwhich Peninsula would elevate us into one of the biggest clubs in the country so in the right conditions, I would support such a move.

    Me too.
  • No smoke without fire.

    Where'd she get that from?

    Varney was only going to be a middle man so who knows?

    She never spoke to Varney, she doesn't know who the buyers were, she is making it up, she's a liar.

    She is also lying about RD not wanting to sell to someone who'd move the club. If someone offered him £50m today he bite their hand off without a second's thought about the Valley, the fans or anyone else.
    Why does she need Varney to tell her who the buyers are?

    If the buyers did not want to be "outed" and PV was acting on their behalf how else would she find out?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Simon E said:

    Katrien opens her mouth, and a lie comes out. Just like night follows day. This time though she has potentially made a slanderous claim. If I was Varney, I would be review my options. And I mean legal options.

    If only Katrien had someone on her team with a law background to advise her about making slanderous claims. Oh, hang on....

    But Varney is only representing them.
    If Varney went down the slander road he'd have to reveal his buyer and their intentions.
    Doubt they want that.

  • It shows how stupid the owner and CEO are, that they have not considered the possibilities of such a move in my opinion.
  • Extraordinary - she's so incompetent she can't even lie plausibly.

    She's either forgotten - or thinks or hopes that we or anyone reading about the press conference won't know or remember - that she refused to meet Varney and hear the proposal of whoever he was acting on behalf of.......
  • Oakster said:

    Katrien is not lying.

    Sue Parkes has confirmed that Peter Varney's plans did indeed involve moving away from The Valley.

    I've now decided that Sue 'My husband never tells me anything but I'm 100% sure that Peter Varney wanted to move Charlton out of the Valley' Parkes, is the Facebook equivalent of Colin.
    Is Colin is a boy named Sue?
    Alter ego :wink: .
  • Is it any wonder that juvenile vampire bats have attached themselves to that woman's dress?
  • LenGlover said:

    I am firmly in the 'believe Varney over Meire camp' but playing devil's advovate for a moment I have a distant memory of Peter Varney mooting a new ground in Kent back in the Prem days.

    Could Murray have told her this and she has spun it to her own advantage?

    If so there is a certain irony in the history she detests so much working to her possible advantage.

    If I recall correctly, it was a site around the Millenium Dome (as it known was at the time) possibly Morden Wharf. Varney was CEO of Richard Murray's board at the time, so there is absolutely no connection with the financial backers that he is working with at the moment.

    Following a fair bit of criticism from supporters who didn't want to leave The Valley, I think he said that they had a responsibility to look into it but that it wasn't going further than that.
  • No smoke without fire.

    Where'd she get that from?

    Varney was only going to be a middle man so who knows?

    She never spoke to Varney, she doesn't know who the buyers were, she is making it up, she's a liar.

    She is also lying about RD not wanting to sell to someone who'd move the club. If someone offered him £50m today he bite their hand off without a second's thought about the Valley, the fans or anyone else.
    Why does she need Varney to tell her who the buyers are?

    Who else knows then? She doesn't and Varney isn't telling anyone,not even me ; - )
  • colin1961 said:

    over to you Varney if it's untrue them sue !!!!
    But either the group you were suppose to present had plans that you nothing about or Richard Murray as told KM and RD that this is what will happen with they deal with you ....

    Over to you Reg ....

    Let Katy provide the proof first Colin
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!