Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Under 21s (Match updates and news)

1371372374376377383

Comments

  • msomerton
    msomerton Posts: 2,972
    How young was this U21 side /new players in it.
  • If the Comms team don’t have the capacity to cover the u21s couldn’t they ask for a volunteer from the fan base or a student who wants a bit of experience writing match reports? 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 11,025
    msomerton said:
    How young was this U21 side /new players in it.
    no one has any idea 
  • Crusty54
    Crusty54 Posts: 3,231
    sam3110 said:
    Currently top of the league on goals scored.

    The academy seems to have fallen in a communications black hole over the summer.

    No squad or released player updates for months, no good luck messages to those leaving and now today.
    So we don't notice when they close the academy next summer : wibble:
    Given the amount of investment in the Academy in recent times I think you are very wrong.
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,255
    Really?? 
  • paulie8290
    paulie8290 Posts: 23,344
    I wonder if the lack of squad announcement for the game today has anything to do with tonight.

    We know NJ doesn't like talking about injuries maybe he doesn't want the under 21 team announced in case it gives Stevenage an idea who is playing tonight 
  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 10,880
    msomerton said:
    How young was this U21 side /new players in it.
    Th team listed on the page before was the sheff wed team 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 11,025
    So we can assume that Rylah, Fullah, Z Mitchell, Laq, Mwamba and Enslin didn't play. I'm assuming that Tommy Reid, Dixon and Mbick did
  • bolloxbolder
    bolloxbolder Posts: 7,960
    MBick scored according to Cawley
  • wolfgang
    wolfgang Posts: 383
    sam3110 said:

    So we don't notice when they close the academy next summer : wibble:
    The new fashion is not to close academies but to sell them, lock, stock, and barrel: players and coaching staff, equipment, and ground-lease if the right area.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,737
    Maybe another question to pose for the Directors to respond to at the upcoming Q & A ? 
  • Crusty54
    Crusty54 Posts: 3,231
    wolfgang said:
    sam3110 said:

    So we don't notice when they close the academy next summer : wibble:
    The new fashion is not to close academies but to sell them, lock, stock, and barrel: players and coaching staff, equipment, and ground-lease if the right area.
    Not in this country.
  • Crusty54
    Crusty54 Posts: 3,231
    The club had updated the Academy premises at Sparrows Lane and added to the number of coaches.

    Why would they close down something that has produced numerous first team players?
  • Swindon_Addick
    Swindon_Addick Posts: 1,632
    I don't see any signs of the club considering backing away from the Academy, which would be not only a huge u-turn on previous policy but also a major breach with a very long-standing club tradition that we are a club that develops more than its fair share of talented youngsters.

    I think we may be seeing signs that the club don't see allowing fans in to see games as a priority. The under-18s and the women's academy team (who are also effectively under-18s) already get a degree of secrecy applied to their games, mainly playing behind closed doors when at home and with very limited updates and few photos. There are good reasons to protect kids from publicity of course, and I doubt any of us have any objection to that, but it does seem a bit odd to have an under-21 game happening not just behind closed doors but also under a social media blackout.
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,255
    Few of you have been whooshed here
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314
    I'm so sad to learn they're closing the academy. Club going to the dogs under Charlie Kelman's tenure 
  • Crusty54
    Crusty54 Posts: 3,231
    Leuth said:
    I'm so sad to learn they're closing the academy. Club going to the dogs under Charlie Kelman's tenure 
    The Academy is not closing. One person makes a false statement on here and you've believed it.
  • Crusty54
    Crusty54 Posts: 3,231
    I don't see any signs of the club considering backing away from the Academy, which would be not only a huge u-turn on previous policy but also a major breach with a very long-standing club tradition that we are a club that develops more than its fair share of talented youngsters.

    I think we may be seeing signs that the club don't see allowing fans in to see games as a priority. The under-18s and the women's academy team (who are also effectively under-18s) already get a degree of secrecy applied to their games, mainly playing behind closed doors when at home and with very limited updates and few photos. There are good reasons to protect kids from publicity of course, and I doubt any of us have any objection to that, but it does seem a bit odd to have an under-21 game happening not just behind closed doors but also under a social media blackout.
    Valley Gold members are allowed to watch the under 18 games at Sparrows Lane on presentation of their membership card.

    Yesterday's game was no different to any other Academy fixture at Sparrows Lane. Valley Gold membership gets you in.

    The communications team are under resourced at the moment despite there being budget provision for the extra posts.
  • jose
    jose Posts: 619
    I would like to read a decent report on the mystery game played yesterday.
    Something as simple as the team line ups, and substitutions, and mention of the goal scorers and times of the goals. A brief mention of the type of goal, as in long range shot, tap in, header from a corner or whatever would be a bonus.
    I suppose I shouldn’t complain because I am not in the promise a lot deliver a little Valley Gold scheme any more.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,842
    Dartford were playing at home yesterday evening, so presumably that's why the game was played at Sparrow's Lane.
  • Sponsored links:



  • One of the academy teams played a friendly v Palace at their training ground yesterday. Maybe u18’s.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,219
    edited August 13
    U21s V Sheffield Weds 12 August 2025

    Team was
    Reid T
    Brown
    Enslin
    Gough
    Hunter
    Ewens-Findley
    Dixon
    Safa
    M'Bick
    Reid R
    Lock

    Subs:
    Casey - replaced Safa 66 mins
    MacLorg - Did not play
    Trialist - replaced Hunter 74 mins
    Trialist - replaced Reid R 63 mins
    Kuczynski - replaced Enslin 74 mins

    Goals
    Brown 45+2
    M'Bick 57
    Enslin 59
    Casey 74
    Lock 88
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,255
    I wondered why Enslin didn't get the start last night, and it's because he got over an hour at lunchtime
  • Swindon_Addick
    Swindon_Addick Posts: 1,632
    Crusty54 said:
    I don't see any signs of the club considering backing away from the Academy, which would be not only a huge u-turn on previous policy but also a major breach with a very long-standing club tradition that we are a club that develops more than its fair share of talented youngsters.

    I think we may be seeing signs that the club don't see allowing fans in to see games as a priority. The under-18s and the women's academy team (who are also effectively under-18s) already get a degree of secrecy applied to their games, mainly playing behind closed doors when at home and with very limited updates and few photos. There are good reasons to protect kids from publicity of course, and I doubt any of us have any objection to that, but it does seem a bit odd to have an under-21 game happening not just behind closed doors but also under a social media blackout.
    Valley Gold members are allowed to watch the under 18 games at Sparrows Lane on presentation of their membership card.

    Yesterday's game was no different to any other Academy fixture at Sparrows Lane. Valley Gold membership gets you in.

    The communications team are under resourced at the moment despite there being budget provision for the extra posts.
    If it's down to a temporary shortage of staff in the comms team then that's good news because it means we can expect things to go back to more or less how we're used to once the issue is solved.
  • msomerton
    msomerton Posts: 2,972
    Crusty54 said:
    The club had updated the Academy premises at Sparrows Lane and added to the number of coaches.

    Why would they close down something that has produced numerous first team players?
    Because it costs two million pounds
    a year to run. 
  • Crusty54
    Crusty54 Posts: 3,231
    msomerton said:
    Crusty54 said:
    The club had updated the Academy premises at Sparrows Lane and added to the number of coaches.

    Why would they close down something that has produced numerous first team players?
    Because it costs two million pounds
    a year to run. 
    Pretty good value then.
  • ParkinsonOut
    ParkinsonOut Posts: 1,463
    One of the academy teams played a friendly v Palace at their training ground yesterday. Maybe u18’s.
    I wondered why the club coach was parked in Kent cricket ground in Beckenham 🤔


  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,842
    sam3110 said:
    I wondered why Enslin didn't get the start last night, and it's because he got over an hour at lunchtime
    A bit weird to play an hour for the U21s at lunchtime, then also play a part in a first team game later that day.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,219
    sam3110 said:
    I wondered why Enslin didn't get the start last night, and it's because he got over an hour at lunchtime
    A bit weird to play an hour for the U21s at lunchtime, then also play a part in a first team game later that day.
    Shows how short of players we are after the owners refused to spend any money.