Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

More Censorship?

2

Comments

  • bellz2002
    bellz2002 Posts: 1,364
    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    I'm not entirely sure however as John doesn't monitor twitter or come on here anymore, it would be down to the club. John doesn't have a problem with my posts but the club do. You know how Katrien and Tony work.

    Apparently Bromley don't have a good relationship with the club anyway so that's why you are allowed to be on committee and post what you do (yes I know I questioned that too).

    Obviously as I've not spoken to the club, I'm not 100% sure if the threats are real, but I'd like to believe John isn't behind this.

    But completely agree that it shouldn't have come to this. Rest assured either way, my comments will continue and I can carry on without headaches.
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,863
    Addickted said:

    Airman Brown said:

    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    Smells of Commerford.

    Actually that sounds like a provincial department store.
    Sue Perks could play their Mrs Slocombe.

    seth plum said:

    'Don't worry Katrien, i'll keep my members in line'.

    Ooh err!
    Are you writing the script for this, Seth? :wink:
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,322
    bellz2002 said:

    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    I'm not entirely sure however as John doesn't monitor twitter or come on here anymore, it would be down to the club. John doesn't have a problem with my posts but the club do. You know how Katrien and Tony work.

    Apparently Bromley don't have a good relationship with the club anyway so that's why you are allowed to be on committee and post what you do (yes I know I questioned that too).

    Obviously as I've not spoken to the club, I'm not 100% sure if the threats are real, but I'd like to believe John isn't behind this.

    But completely agree that it shouldn't have come to this. Rest assured either way, my comments will continue and I can carry on without headaches.
    "That's why I'm "allowed"??????

    It's not in their gift to "allow" or not allow me or anyone else to comment.

    Sorry, but I think John has tricked you. You could have stayed and nothing would have happened. John just wanted to look good for Tony and was happy to stab you in the back to do it.
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 34,080
    Henry Irving said:

    bellz2002 said:

    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    I'm not entirely sure however as John doesn't monitor twitter or come on here anymore, it would be down to the club. John doesn't have a problem with my posts but the club do. You know how Katrien and Tony work.

    Apparently Bromley don't have a good relationship with the club anyway so that's why you are allowed to be on committee and post what you do (yes I know I questioned that too).

    Obviously as I've not spoken to the club, I'm not 100% sure if the threats are real, but I'd like to believe John isn't behind this.

    But completely agree that it shouldn't have come to this. Rest assured either way, my comments will continue and I can carry on without headaches.
    "That's why I'm "allowed"??????

    It's not in their gift to "allow" or not allow me or anyone else to comment.

    Sorry, but I think John has tricked you. You could have stayed and nothing would have happened. John just wanted to look good for Tony and was happy to stab you in the back to do it.
    worryingly, this could be true
  • Curb_It
    Curb_It Posts: 21,241
    Henry Irving said:

    bellz2002 said:

    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    I'm not entirely sure however as John doesn't monitor twitter or come on here anymore, it would be down to the club. John doesn't have a problem with my posts but the club do. You know how Katrien and Tony work.

    Apparently Bromley don't have a good relationship with the club anyway so that's why you are allowed to be on committee and post what you do (yes I know I questioned that too).

    Obviously as I've not spoken to the club, I'm not 100% sure if the threats are real, but I'd like to believe John isn't behind this.

    But completely agree that it shouldn't have come to this. Rest assured either way, my comments will continue and I can carry on without headaches.
    "That's why I'm "allowed"??????

    It's not in their gift to "allow" or not allow me or anyone else to comment.

    Sorry, but I think John has tricked you. You could have stayed and nothing would have happened. John just wanted to look good for Tony and was happy to stab you in the back to do it.
    Do you really think that? Bloody hell how Machiavellian.


  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 95,028
    Addickted said:

    Airman Brown said:

    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    Smells of Commerford.

    Actually that sounds like a provincial department store.
    Sue Perks could play their Mrs Slocombe.

    Is she being Served then? ;)

    I thought she had to go get her Vol-au-Vents herself at Half Time?
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,666
    Addickted said:

    Airman Brown said:

    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    Smells of Commerford.

    Actually that sounds like a provincial department store.
    Sue Perks could play their Mrs Slocombe.

    Has anybody seen her ......LEAVE IT

  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    Henry Irving said:

    bellz2002 said:

    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    I'm not entirely sure however as John doesn't monitor twitter or come on here anymore, it would be down to the club. John doesn't have a problem with my posts but the club do. You know how Katrien and Tony work.

    Apparently Bromley don't have a good relationship with the club anyway so that's why you are allowed to be on committee and post what you do (yes I know I questioned that too).

    Obviously as I've not spoken to the club, I'm not 100% sure if the threats are real, but I'd like to believe John isn't behind this.

    But completely agree that it shouldn't have come to this. Rest assured either way, my comments will continue and I can carry on without headaches.
    "That's why I'm "allowed"??????

    It's not in their gift to "allow" or not allow me or anyone else to comment.

    Sorry, but I think John has tricked you. You could have stayed and nothing would have happened. John just wanted to look good for Tony and was happy to stab you in the back to do it.
    Hmmmmm.

    When is you next Q&A?

    Instead of Holmes and Pearce, you may end up with a couple of guys from Centre Circle.
  • I_was_Floyd
    I_was_Floyd Posts: 468
    Henry Irving said:

    bellz2002 said:

    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    I'm not entirely sure however as John doesn't monitor twitter or come on here anymore, it would be down to the club. John doesn't have a problem with my posts but the club do. You know how Katrien and Tony work.

    Apparently Bromley don't have a good relationship with the club anyway so that's why you are allowed to be on committee and post what you do (yes I know I questioned that too).

    Obviously as I've not spoken to the club, I'm not 100% sure if the threats are real, but I'd like to believe John isn't behind this.

    But completely agree that it shouldn't have come to this. Rest assured either way, my comments will continue and I can carry on without headaches.
    "That's why I'm "allowed"??????

    It's not in their gift to "allow" or not allow me or anyone else to comment.

    Sorry, but I think John has tricked you. You could have stayed and nothing would have happened. John just wanted to look good for Tony and was happy to stab you in the back to do it.
    EKA are a knives manufacturer. All adds up.


  • Sponsored links:



  • mrbligh
    mrbligh Posts: 3,056
    Time to dust off the ol flag making fingers I feel
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    It is easy for me to say this because I am not a member of a branch and don't attend these Q and A sessions with players and the like.
    However my instinct would be to react to the 'threat' of not sending players to an event would be to say 'f**k you then, don't send anybody'. My instinct would not be to comply with the wishes of the evil skunk Cojones.
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,240
    We must of reached an impasse by now.

    Didn't all ways work well when times were decent with stock answers by current players.
    The one i went to last season which followed 5 straight defeats and the interim coach about to start was just sheer embarrassment for players and members alike.

    Ex players who can speak candidly and Guys like the Journo and Charlton Fan Patrick Collins have been Superb evenings.

    Just a pointless exercise to even consider current players at the Present time.
  • Kap10
    Kap10 Posts: 15,601
    Airman Brown said:

    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    Smells of Commerford.

    Actually that sounds like a provincial department store.
    Provincial department stores will take offence at that remark!

    #bringbackchiesemans
  • TellyTubby
    TellyTubby Posts: 3,559
    bellz2002 said:

    Henry Irving said:

    bellz2002 said:

    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    I'm not entirely sure however as John doesn't monitor twitter or come on here anymore, it would be down to the club. John doesn't have a problem with my posts but the club do. You know how Katrien and Tony work.

    Apparently Bromley don't have a good relationship with the club anyway so that's why you are allowed to be on committee and post what you do (yes I know I questioned that too).

    Obviously as I've not spoken to the club, I'm not 100% sure if the threats are real, but I'd like to believe John isn't behind this.

    But completely agree that it shouldn't have come to this. Rest assured either way, my comments will continue and I can carry on without headaches.
    "That's why I'm "allowed"??????

    It's not in their gift to "allow" or not allow me or anyone else to comment
    Completely agree. As we are both part of independent supporters groups, we have the human right of free speech and personal opinions. Even if we aren't independent, we still have our right to personal comments and free speech.
    It seems like, as others have said, that EKA are now seen to be pro-regime (like Target20k) and unfortunately as this message / instruction was passed onto me, the group haven't done themselves any favours.
    Quite right in saying EKA could and should have refused the censorship.

    When I was talking to a friend about this a few hours ago, my voice started to shake due to my fury at the incident. Thankful for all the support though from my fellow fans.
    I know that you are understandably reluctant to comment too much ' on the committee members but based on what I have read of this, the whole situation stinks.

    The committee should have stood United against this nonsense if indeed it did come as a dictat from the regime.

    They have nailed their colours to the mast. How does the group operate, is there any chance of the membership can or want to throw out committee?

    It's happened before with CASC if the will is there.
  • Coyotejohn1947
    Coyotejohn1947 Posts: 1,163
    bellz2002 said:

    Henry Irving said:

    bellz2002 said:

    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    I'm not entirely sure however as John doesn't monitor twitter or come on here anymore, it would be down to the club. John doesn't have a problem with my posts but the club do. You know how Katrien and Tony work.

    Apparently Bromley don't have a good relationship with the club anyway so that's why you are allowed to be on committee and post what you do (yes I know I questioned that too).

    Obviously as I've not spoken to the club, I'm not 100% sure if the threats are real, but I'd like to believe John isn't behind this.

    But completely agree that it shouldn't have come to this. Rest assured either way, my comments will continue and I can carry on without headaches.
    "That's why I'm "allowed"??????

    It's not in their gift to "allow" or not allow me or anyone else to comment
    Completely agree. As we are both part of independent supporters groups, we have the human right of free speech and personal opinions. Even if we aren't independent, we still have our right to personal comments and free speech.
    It seems like, as others have said, that EKA are now seen to be pro-regime (like Target20k) and unfortunately as this message / instruction was passed onto me, the group haven't done themselves any favours.
    Quite right in saying EKA could and should have refused the censorship.

    When I was talking to a friend about this a few hours ago, my voice started to shake due to my fury at the incident. Thankful for all the support though from my fellow fans.
    This is the thing that stands out for me and illustrates once again how Meire just doesn't get it. She talks about learning from mistakes (we all know that those are empty words as CARD so graphically demonstrated) but she did mean exactly what she said in Dublin "..........the fans don't see themselves as customers and that's weird....".

    IMO she never will learn, never will understand what it is to support a football club and never will understand the level of attachment that one has with the club. Sorry if I've gone off subject here but when I saw those words I recognised what has happened to so many fans that I have spoken to and heard about the emotions which have been aroused.

    Those in positions of influence in the various supporters groups, if, after all that has been exposed about this poisonous regime and its deeply unpleasant and non-caring CEO and functionaries, are still prepared to give the regime the benefit of the doubt then they should take time at least to reflect on this position.
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,930
    edited October 2016
    They will never censor me

    MrOneLumg wishes Dear Katrien and Comrade Tony all the best for the remainder of the season.
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,826
    Is he your oriental cousin?
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 18,769
    i
    TellyTubby said:

    bellz2002 said:

    Henry Irving said:

    bellz2002 said:

    Henry Irving said:

    So @bellz2002 was this Commerford or the club?

    Did the club actually say get rid of him or no guests or is Commerford using this as an excuse.

    As far as I know nothing has been said to Bromley Addicks and we had guests two weeks ago.

    But John "quisling" Commerford likes running to the bully Keohane to fight his battles for him so wouldn't put it past the windbag bending over and doing the club's dirty work or using an imaginary threat to get you to shut up and/or resign

    I'm not entirely sure however as John doesn't monitor twitter or come on here anymore, it would be down to the club. John doesn't have a problem with my posts but the club do. You know how Katrien and Tony work.

    Apparently Bromley don't have a good relationship with the club anyway so that's why you are allowed to be on committee and post what you do (yes I know I questioned that too).

    Obviously as I've not spoken to the club, I'm not 100% sure if the threats are real, but I'd like to believe John isn't behind this.

    But completely agree that it shouldn't have come to this. Rest assured either way, my comments will continue and I can carry on without headaches.
    "That's why I'm "allowed"??????

    It's not in their gift to "allow" or not allow me or anyone else to comment
    Completely agree. As we are both part of independent supporters groups, we have the human right of free speech and personal opinions. Even if we aren't independent, we still have our right to personal comments and free speech.
    It seems like, as others have said, that EKA are now seen to be pro-regime (like Target20k) and unfortunately as this message / instruction was passed onto me, the group haven't done themselves any favours.
    Quite right in saying EKA could and should have refused the censorship.

    When I was talking to a friend about this a few hours ago, my voice started to shake due to my fury at the incident. Thankful for all the support though from my fellow fans.
    I know that you are understandably reluctant to comment too much ' on the committee members but based on what I have read of this, the whole situation stinks.

    The committee should have stood United against this nonsense if indeed it did come as a dictat from the regime.

    They have nailed their colours to the mast. How does the group operate, is there any chance of the membership can or want to throw out committee?

    It's happened before with CASC if the will is there.
    Spot on, TT


  • Sponsored links:



  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    This is getting like a bad parenting movie.

    Child won't behave?

    Threaten to remove their privileges, threaten them with physical violence and now we have financial threats.

    Never fear as bullies always get their come uppence.
  • mogodon
    mogodon Posts: 3,423
    Has Keohane struck again? If not, then how come some of the discussions about him seem to have disappeared?
  • Pedro45
    Pedro45 Posts: 5,850
    mogodon said:

    Has Keohane struck again? If not, then how come some of the discussions about him seem to have disappeared?

    See the T&C thread...
  • mogodon
    mogodon Posts: 3,423
    Pedro45 said:

    mogodon said:

    Has Keohane struck again? If not, then how come some of the discussions about him seem to have disappeared?

    See the T&C thread...
    Yes, I have read that but those T&Cs are not new. SO what overnight has caused the moderators to remove discussions? It can't be a sudden burst of sympathy. Without an explanation, we have to presume that Keohane or the club has gone on the attack against CL. The worry here is if he has succeeded, where will it stop?

    I can see why some individual comments may have been removed, but complete discussions?
  • Missed It
    Missed It Posts: 2,735
    Hopefully its just a result of the steward issues possibly going to criminal proceedings.

    It would be very concerning if Charlton have put a legal shot across Charlton Life's bow in respect of defamation/libel. North Korea indeed...
  • Madz
    Madz Posts: 1,004
    They can't handle negative feedback. They only want to speak to fans who follow their ideas, can't be many of those left. How can the FA think this group are fit and proper to run a football club.

    They say the want to talk to fans to sort out the mess. You can only sort out the mess if you listen to the ones who can see the problem.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,743
    Dear Roland, Katie, Tony and Sue.

    If you have been offended by any of my comments over the last few months i would just like to say tough i meant every one of them.

    Now sell the club and piss off
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,826
    I believe I am able to say without fear of being hauled before the courts (especially for defamation) that Katrien Meire and Tony Keohane are incompetent and not fit to be senior staff members in charge of a football club.

    After all, I could call in virtually the whole of UK football in my defence.
  • Bil_Bailey
    Bil_Bailey Posts: 48
    2 Days in and I`m still none the wiser as to what has happened to cause the Owner/Moderators to delete threads and make a special issue of the T&C`s.
    Of course I can guess, but then maybe I`ll be guessing wrongly and accusing the wrong people of getting involved ( as many may or may not have done ).

    Some sort of announcement should be made by Owner/Moderators.

Categories

“Marketplace”