Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Getting To Know The Network (4 Part Radio Documentary) (31/1 Part 3, pg. 17)

1246724

Comments

  • PopIcon
    PopIcon Posts: 5,970
    Lots of bitter ex-employees interviewed. That Ben Hamer must be particularly bitter at having to wear a Premier League winners medal.
  • Confirms everything that was suspected about the way in which the club was/is being run.
    Those that think the appointment of Karl Robinson is a step forward need to have a serious rethink. It is clear that no manager can succeed under Duchatelet.
  • HarryLime
    HarryLime Posts: 1,295
    I haven't listened to the programmes yet, but that email to Powell read like one of Ackworths. I just can't get over the fact that someone with the supposed business acumen of Duchatelet allows cockroaches of the likes of Mowgli and Meire so much influence at the club.
  • jdmotion said:

    It's an extraordinarily good piece of journalism from what I've heard so far.

    Surely the CEO must now resign. Her position is untenable.

    The big questions now have got to be 'to what extent have things changed at The Valley, and if they have changed, to what extent, if any, will the fans be able to forgive what's gone on in the past?'

    Will never happen. She's been clinging on for years and will continue to do so. Roly wont sack her either.
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,807
    Is that Producer Ben from the Guardian football weekly doing the intros? Sounds a lot like him
  • ozaddick
    ozaddick Posts: 2,845
    Brilliant and insightful stuff. We really are run by fukwits!
  • cafc999
    cafc999 Posts: 4,967
    jdmotion said:

    It's an extraordinarily good piece of journalism from what I've heard so far.

    Surely the CEO must now resign. Her position is untenable.

    The big questions now have got to be 'to what extent have things changed at The Valley, and if they have changed, to what extent, if any, will the fans be able to forgive what's gone on in the past?'

    As posted before, her position has been untenable for years.

    She is now simply putting herself before the club, which is wrong. If your reading this Daisy, which no doubt you, or one of your minions are, just remember this famous saying - No one person is bigger than the club.

  • Surely this screws the FA's fit and proper test?!
  • Sponsored links:



  • Surely this screws the FA's fit and proper test?!

    Not really. The FA would fail any fit and proper test themselves! They don't care as long as money continues to roll in.
  • Oh_Yoni_Boy
    Oh_Yoni_Boy Posts: 1,762
    Listened to both on the way in this morning, really well put together and told.

    Made me feel a mixture of sad/angry... I do truthfully believe they have learnt something of a lesson from it and are better now (and are still god-awful, don't get me wrong) but that first year is completely unforgivable.
  • ChiAddick
    ChiAddick Posts: 1,781
    Can't believe (well actually I can) people on the Charlton Facebook page think all this is fake. Really hope the journo's run with this. So so depressing but well done to all who put this together.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,037
    ChiAddick said:

    Can't believe (well actually I can) people on the Charlton Facebook page think all this is fake. Really hope the journo's run with this. So so depressing but well done to all who put this together.

    All of it ? As in Hamer, Pritchard, Pitor and Powell are being impersonated ?

    I actually think releasing the emails might have been a mistake, it's easy to say "the emails are just fakes" and undermine the whole thing - just listening to the interviews is enough to confirm how insane the whole set up is.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,223
    ChiAddick said:

    Can't believe (well actually I can) people on the Charlton Facebook page think all this is fake. Really hope the journo's run with this. So so depressing but well done to all who put this together.

    They think an interview with the actual person speaking is "fake"?

    if the emails were fake then Jimmy would be sued in seconds but how can the interviews be fake?

    You can choose to not believe what they are saying or even ignore it as unimportant but they are interviews.
  • If these are a hoax it would very much undermine our protests and we would lose a lot of goodwill.

    If they are legit, which would not be surprising, then I cannot understand how anyone can still defend this outfit of raving lunatics.

    They're legit.
  • I don't ever want to see or hear this nonsense that Duchatelet is an intelligent bloke because of Melexis. That regurgitated email from Driesen to Powell alone is enough. How has Duchatelet been sucked in by him and Meire? The bloke is clueless.
  • ChiAddick
    ChiAddick Posts: 1,781
    edited November 2016

    ChiAddick said:

    Can't believe (well actually I can) people on the Charlton Facebook page think all this is fake. Really hope the journo's run with this. So so depressing but well done to all who put this together.

    They think an interview with the actual person speaking is "fake"?

    if the emails were fake then Jimmy would be sued in seconds but how can the interviews be fake?

    You can choose to not believe what they are saying or even ignore it as unimportant but they are interviews.
    I think its more that here we have irrefutable evidence and they just don't want to believe it. Head in the sand ostriche style.
  • SuedeAdidas
    SuedeAdidas Posts: 7,741



    Anyone have an idea as to when we can expect Episode 3?

    Think the website says early next year.
  • Sponsored links:



  • ChiAddick said:

    ChiAddick said:

    Can't believe (well actually I can) people on the Charlton Facebook page think all this is fake. Really hope the journo's run with this. So so depressing but well done to all who put this together.

    They think an interview with the actual person speaking is "fake"?

    if the emails were fake then Jimmy would be sued in seconds but how can the interviews be fake?

    You can choose to not believe what they are saying or even ignore it as unimportant but they are interviews.
    I think its more that here we have irrefutable evidence and they just don't want to believe it. Head in the sand ostriche style.
    Look at the forum that must not be named for proper head in the sand behaviour.
  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,223
    The interview from Polish Pete made me feel really sorry for him. Great stuff so far!
  • cafctom
    cafctom Posts: 11,371
    ChiAddick said:

    ChiAddick said:

    Can't believe (well actually I can) people on the Charlton Facebook page think all this is fake. Really hope the journo's run with this. So so depressing but well done to all who put this together.

    They think an interview with the actual person speaking is "fake"?

    if the emails were fake then Jimmy would be sued in seconds but how can the interviews be fake?

    You can choose to not believe what they are saying or even ignore it as unimportant but they are interviews.
    I think its more that here we have irrefutable evidence and they just don't want to believe it. Head in the sand ostriche style.
    That's what baffles me. Fans who simply will not believe what's in front of their eyes (irrefutable evidence, half empty stadiums, League One football, eight managers, the list goes on....)

    It's as if they are quite content with the club and it's fans being abused, just as long as they get to watch their football on a Saturday.

  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,127
    edited November 2016

    ChiAddick said:

    ChiAddick said:

    Can't believe (well actually I can) people on the Charlton Facebook page think all this is fake. Really hope the journo's run with this. So so depressing but well done to all who put this together.

    They think an interview with the actual person speaking is "fake"?

    if the emails were fake then Jimmy would be sued in seconds but how can the interviews be fake?

    You can choose to not believe what they are saying or even ignore it as unimportant but they are interviews.
    I think its more that here we have irrefutable evidence and they just don't want to believe it. Head in the sand ostriche style.
    Look at the forum that must not be named for proper head in the sand behaviour.
    .
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,229
    Very very good podcasts. Well done to all involved in getting all those on tape with their views/opinions. Looking forward to the next 2 in 2017. In the meantime, this needs to go out to all the media outlets.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,223
    edited November 2016
    .
  • forzajuve_27
    forzajuve_27 Posts: 590
    edited November 2016
    And yet there will still be 'fans' willing to give these jokers another chance...
  • Missed It
    Missed It Posts: 2,734
    .
    ChiAddick said:

    ChiAddick said:

    Can't believe (well actually I can) people on the Charlton Facebook page think all this is fake. Really hope the journo's run with this. So so depressing but well done to all who put this together.

    They think an interview with the actual person speaking is "fake"?

    if the emails were fake then Jimmy would be sued in seconds but how can the interviews be fake?

    You can choose to not believe what they are saying or even ignore it as unimportant but they are interviews.
    I think its more that here we have irrefutable evidence and they just don't want to believe it. Head in the sand ostriche style.

    There are none so blind as those that will not see...