I have a deep aversion to fish puns so only skim this thread occasionally. I may have missed something so please ignore this post if I am raising an issue that has already been dealt with.
Fact: we have some director loans totalling £7 million. These loans have been raised against the ground and training ground.
Fact: these loans only become payable on promotion to the Premier League.
Fact: on promotion to the Premiership Charlton will immediately receive approximately £100 million and guaranteed £90 million for the following three years in parachute payments if we are relegated after one season.
Is it still being claimed that the £7 million in loans is holding up a sale?
It is suggested that new owners who might want to raise finance on the assets might not be able to without clean title.
I have a deep aversion to fish puns so only skim this thread occasionally. I may have missed something so please ignore this post if I am raising an issue that has already been dealt with.
Fact: we have some director loans totalling £7 million. These loans have been raised against the ground and training ground.
Fact: these loans only become payable on promotion to the Premier League.
Fact: on promotion to the Premiership Charlton will immediately receive approximately £100 million and guaranteed £90 million for the following three years in parachute payments if we are relegated after one season.
Is it still being claimed that the £7 million in loans is holding up a sale?
It is suggested that new owners who might want to raise finance on the assets might not be able to without clean title.
I have a deep aversion to fish puns so only skim this thread occasionally. I may have missed something so please ignore this post if I am raising an issue that has already been dealt with.
Fact: we have some director loans totalling £7 million. These loans have been raised against the ground and training ground.
Fact: these loans only become payable on promotion to the Premier League.
Fact: on promotion to the Premiership Charlton will immediately receive approximately £100 million and guaranteed £90 million for the following three years in parachute payments if we are relegated after one season.
Is it still being claimed that the £7 million in loans is holding up a sale?
It is suggested that new owners who might want to raise finance on the assets might not be able to without clean title.
Doesn’t make sense.
Does to me. Debt isn't as secured without clean title.
I have a deep aversion to fish puns so only skim this thread occasionally. I may have missed something so please ignore this post if I am raising an issue that has already been dealt with.
Fact: we have some director loans totalling £7 million. These loans have been raised against the ground and training ground.
Fact: these loans only become payable on promotion to the Premier League.
Fact: on promotion to the Premiership Charlton will immediately receive approximately £100 million and guaranteed £90 million for the following three years in parachute payments if we are relegated after one season.
Is it still being claimed that the £7 million in loans is holding up a sale?
It is suggested that new owners who might want to raise finance on the assets might not be able to without clean title.
Doesn’t make sense.
In simple terms, as I understand it, it would be difficult to get a second loan against property that already has a charge (the ex-directors bonds) against it as the lender would be second in line to collect if it all went wrong.
@Grapevine49 can explain it better than me, I'm sure
Who cares how much it’ll cost to buy us? We just need it done ASAP.
Surprisingly, the buyers and the seller.
I don’t believe there are any buyers or sellers on here.
Maybe the people that come on here want to find out what is or might be happening; might want to share their understanding or prediction are to the outcome; or are genuinely curious as to what the effect of a significant investment in Charlton would be on the playing strength of the squad, future plans, catering, ticket pricing and ambitions of the club.
Why do you post on here?
Exactly that.
I get bored with the usual 50 post bursts of how much it is going to cost especially when most are second guessing. I’m really not bothered if it’s £26m, £33m or £40m+. It really isn’t important.
I have a deep aversion to fish puns so only skim this thread occasionally. I may have missed something so please ignore this post if I am raising an issue that has already been dealt with.
Fact: we have some director loans totalling £7 million. These loans have been raised against the ground and training ground.
Fact: these loans only become payable on promotion to the Premier League.
Fact: on promotion to the Premiership Charlton will immediately receive approximately £100 million and guaranteed £90 million for the following three years in parachute payments if we are relegated after one season.
Is it still being claimed that the £7 million in loans is holding up a sale?
It is suggested that new owners who might want to raise finance on the assets might not be able to without clean title.
Doesn’t make sense.
In simple terms, as I understand it, it would be difficult to get a second loan against property that already has a charge (the ex-directors bonds) against it as the lender would be second in line to collect if it all went wrong.
@Grapevine49 can explain it better than me, I'm sure
And more importantly the value isn’t there to support such a loan in the first place.
I don't get people dismissing the £7m. Its a real issue for whoever is buying as I doubt they are buying the club just to sit in the Championship, so this will become payable in their eyes in their plan. Just because you get mega money in the EPL, £7m is still a significant sum. Its probably one less player in the squad for a season.
Clear title could also mean that the new owners are mega rich and want to use the assets as a vehicle to circumnavigate FFP in the championship? See Derby and Sheffield Wednesday.
Although if that ever happened the bed wetters would be out in full force.
I have a deep aversion to fish puns so only skim this thread occasionally. I may have missed something so please ignore this post if I am raising an issue that has already been dealt with.
Fact: we have some director loans totalling £7 million. These loans have been raised against the ground and training ground.
Fact: these loans only become payable on promotion to the Premier League.
Fact: on promotion to the Premiership Charlton will immediately receive approximately £100 million and guaranteed £90 million for the following three years in parachute payments if we are relegated after one season.
Is it still being claimed that the £7 million in loans is holding up a sale?
It is suggested that new owners who might want to raise finance on the assets might not be able to without clean title.
Doesn’t make sense.
It does.
It doesn’t. First thing to remember is this is not a normal debt. It may never be paid. It is also interest free so it may not be financially prudent to repay it. Also, we are living in the 21st century. A world of incredibly complex financial and insurance instruments. If I was buying the club and my plan involved borrowing against the assets and I wanted to borrow the full value of the assets I Find it difficult to believe I could not easily and with not too much additional cost go to the debt market and get that loan with a tailored financial instrument that guaranteeid immediate repayment of the director loans on promotion to the Premier league.
Clear title could also mean that the new owners are mega rich and want to use the assets as a vehicle to circumnavigate FFP in the championship? See Derby and Sheffield Wednesday.
Although if that ever happened the bet wetters would be out in full force.
Which area is preferred for our new ground; Greenwich peninsula or somewhere in Kent or ground sharing with Millwall...that would be nice.
Clear title could also mean that the new owners are mega rich and want to use the assets as a vehicle to circumnavigate FFP in the championship? See Derby and Sheffield Wednesday.
Although if that ever happened the bet wetters would be out in full force.
Which area is preferred for our new ground; Greenwich peninsula or somewhere in Kent or ground sharing with Millwall...that would be nice.
Clear title could also mean that the new owners are mega rich and want to use the assets as a vehicle to circumnavigate FFP in the championship? See Derby and Sheffield Wednesday.
Although if that ever happened the bet wetters would be out in full force.
Which area is preferred for our new ground; Greenwich peninsula or somewhere in Kent or ground sharing with Millwall...that would be nice.
Who mentioned a new ground?
No one, but it’s a good hook for more posts on the thread of the century!
Do I take it that Roland was conning the Aussies by saying he would clear the £7m, whilst actually paying only 25% of that figure?
If so, maybe the Aussies and of others are saying c£30m, minus the £7m which we will settle, and then Rolly has then changed the price because the con did not work? Just a thought.
What a frigging disappointment. I just came back to this thread after about 3 months away from it. Absolutely nothing has changed. We've had the most amazing season as fans and yet The Rat is still owning our beloved and no sign of his demise.
I refuse to cash in my euphoria chips just yet however and dream that a rich oil tycoon can save us from this tyrant.
I have reliable information that RD was still quoting a much higher price to new potential bidders who came forward after Wembley. In the case I know of, they were quoted the property-based structure that someone mentioned a while ago, i.e. Club for £1, Valley for £50m, training ground for a figure somewhere above £5m. Of course it is perfectly possible that the lower figures quoted re the Aussies is still accurate since they have been "negotiating" so long. I don't know what has happened re the bid I mention here. I fear that the silence means that they were put off by the price they were quoted, and who would blame them. It's a pity, because I was told the ID of the buyer, and found the person quite interesting. If anyone wants to confront LdT with my assertion, on my behalf, I would be very happy if they did so.
Comments
@Grapevine49 can explain it better than me, I'm sure
I get bored with the usual 50 post bursts of how much it is going to cost especially when most are second guessing. I’m really not bothered if it’s £26m, £33m or £40m+. It really isn’t important.
Just my opinion of course.
Although if that ever happened the bed wetters would be out in full force.
If only someone could come up with a simple house buying analogy.
If so, maybe the Aussies and of others are saying c£30m, minus the £7m which we will settle, and then Rolly has then changed the price because the con did not work? Just a thought.
I refuse to cash in my euphoria chips just yet however and dream that a rich oil tycoon can save us from this tyrant.
According to LDT we have a new Belgium consortium who are very interested and minted but have yet to lodge paperwork at the EFL.
I don't know what has happened re the bid I mention here. I fear that the silence means that they were put off by the price they were quoted, and who would blame them. It's a pity, because I was told the ID of the buyer, and found the person quite interesting.
If anyone wants to confront LdT with my assertion, on my behalf, I would be very happy if they did so.