Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)

16536546566586592262

Comments

  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,234
    Redhenry said:

    Please don't panic, I just meant it's more complicated than @Henry Irving summary

    Have to keep it simple for AFKA to cut and paste to the bite size thread
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811

    Murray has made public statements which have turned out to be false. They are in VOTV. What is the difference between that and lying?

    I don't think either Murray or Airman have lied. A lot of what both of them have said would have what they believed. Problem is Murray has been receiving his info from a compulsive liar, and it's in Airmans interests to print everthing, even when there is an element of doubt involved.

    I think people should try to concentrate on the team at the moment, this takeover has plenty of twists and turns left so I don't see the point in being impatient.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,360

    Dazzler21 said:

    Charlton Fans in generalimage
    Charlton Fans from the other site...
    image
    Charlton Life, Charlton Fans...
    image

    @Airman Brown @Redhenry
    image

    @nth london addick
    image

    @DOUCHER
    image

    AND Sorry for rinsing people's data...

    @DOUCHER being likened to tommy wiseau is one of the most accurate comparisons on this thread
    I did not hit her, I did not... I DID NAAAT! :lol:
  • Redhenry said:

    Please don't panic, I just meant it's more complicated than @Henry Irving summary

    It always is but he means well.

  • Howells
    Howells Posts: 253

    Dazzler21 said:

    Charlton Fans in generalimage
    Charlton Fans from the other site...
    image
    Charlton Life, Charlton Fans...
    image

    @Airman Brown @Redhenry
    image

    @nth london addick
    image

    @DOUCHER
    image

    AND Sorry for rinsing people's data...

    @DOUCHER being likened to tommy wiseau is one of the most accurate comparisons on this thread
    Oh Hi Mark.
  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,056
    Redhenry said:

    Taxi_Lad said:

    All the doom merchants saying he won’t sell til someone pays him £xxx needs to remember the club is losing (ergo RD) £1m a Month
    He will sell soon. He’s a lot of things but where money is concerned he ain’t daft

    But he is not "losing" is he. I thought he was "loaning" the club the money it needs each month and then charging interest on top?
    But he can't keep bumping up the asking price to cover those losses... or he could but then no-one will buy.
    They don't look like they are breaking the doors down now to buy so who knows what RD is asking for.
    He has lowered it to 40 mill apparently. Still two left in slightly different bids. Neither been accepted as far as I know
    That’s at least £15m over the top. I’d hope that it would at least include the £7m owed to former directors, NO additional, incremental payments to RD and a complete clean slate on his “friendly debt”. Anything other than that and someone is way out of kilter (no Scottish link there), with the business of buying football clubs.
  • Macronate
    Macronate Posts: 12,897
    Redhenry said:

    Please don't panic, I just meant it's more complicated than @Henry Irving summary

    Is it connected to the outstanding sofa loan payments to DFS?
  • barstool said:

    Its a Mexican stand off

    More like a Belgian Bugger-About
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    Macronate said:

    Redhenry said:

    Please don't panic, I just meant it's more complicated than @Henry Irving summary

    Is it connected to the outstanding sofa loan payments to DFS?
    You don't have to pay them anything for the first three years, so it should be factored in.

    I expect this is what's holding up the deal, as it's down as a liability on the balance sheet, but Henry made sure there isn't actually a sofa.

    It's the sort of responsible and detailed DD that Duchatalet never did.
  • Arsenetatters
    Arsenetatters Posts: 5,976

    dickplumb said:

    I think Charlton fans are being lied to by Murray and Duchatelet. We are being played like a fiddle and I am sick of it. The two bids were supposed to be agreed months ago. Now we hear that no bids have been agreed. What the fuck is happening?

    Murray has no medium or long-term interest in making statements that turn out not to be true. He would have been better off personally saying nothing at all. Duchatelet is just mad. Even if they were capable of crafting a conspiracy between them, it's hard to see Duchatelet would have expensive lawyers and accountants running around on the clock for months in order to deceive supporters.

    But he was (quite rightly) backed into a corner by the threat of the CARD protest - wasn't it meant to be calling for him to talk to the crowd? So I guess he had to say something. He just said enough to stop further protests.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,814
    I’m afraid Murray reminds me of a combination of Sméagol and Tom Riddle as they appear later in the books with slightly alter ego.
  • lolwray
    lolwray Posts: 4,902
    i have heard from an ITK source that theres a stumbling block on the sell on value of unused vol au vent cases
  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,118

    dickplumb said:

    I think Charlton fans are being lied to by Murray and Duchatelet. We are being played like a fiddle and I am sick of it. The two bids were supposed to be agreed months ago. Now we hear that no bids have been agreed. What the fuck is happening?

    Murray has no medium or long-term interest in making statements that turn out not to be true. He would have been better off personally saying nothing at all. Duchatelet is just mad. Even if they were capable of crafting a conspiracy between them, it's hard to see Duchatelet would have expensive lawyers and accountants running around on the clock for months in order to deceive supporters.

    But he was (quite rightly) backed into a corner by the threat of the CARD protest - wasn't it meant to be calling for him to talk to the crowd? So I guess he had to say something. He just said enough to stop further protests.
    Exactly, worked like a charm, apparently protests had been planned for Charlton and Belgium, now nothing until next season

    RM has played a blinder for his boss and keeps his seat at the top table, which is, imo, all he has ever wanted.

    Im really worried the old turd RD will still be in charge next season.
  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,742
    edited April 2018

    Murray has made public statements which have turned out to be false. They are in VOTV. What is the difference between that and lying?

    He has to know they are untrue when he makes them for him to be lying. Even the belief they are untrue is largely or entirely based on things people post here under pseudonyms (as I am, but I'm not concealing my identity). I am not criticising anyone, but people need to calm down a bit. Things have moved backwards as well as forwards in this saga. Things that were true or appeared to be true become untrue or turn out not to have been.

    dickplumb said:

    I think Charlton fans are being lied to by Murray and Duchatelet. We are being played like a fiddle and I am sick of it. The two bids were supposed to be agreed months ago. Now we hear that no bids have been agreed. What the fuck is happening?

    Murray has no medium or long-term interest in making statements that turn out not to be true. He would have been better off personally saying nothing at all. Duchatelet is just mad. Even if they were capable of crafting a conspiracy between them, it's hard to see Duchatelet would have expensive lawyers and accountants running around on the clock for months in order to deceive supporters.

    But he was (quite rightly) backed into a corner by the threat of the CARD protest - wasn't it meant to be calling for him to talk to the crowd? So I guess he had to say something. He just said enough to stop further protests.
    So are protests at The Valley effective or not effective? I can't keep up. Murray likely wants to void exposing the extent to which he is now regarded as an enemy, probably because he is keen to sell himself as the man the fans trust to new owners. However, you can't explain all of his statements since January 20th on the basis of an aborted protest that day. Indeed, fewer and fewer people believe him anyway.
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    Dazzler21 said:

    Dazzler21 said:

    Charlton Fans in generalimage
    Charlton Fans from the other site...
    image
    Charlton Life, Charlton Fans...
    image

    @Airman Brown @Redhenry
    image

    @nth london addick
    image

    @DOUCHER
    image

    AND Sorry for rinsing people's data...

    @DOUCHER being likened to tommy wiseau is one of the most accurate comparisons on this thread
    I did not hit her, I did not... I DID NAAAT! :lol:
    Howells said:

    Dazzler21 said:

    Charlton Fans in generalimage
    Charlton Fans from the other site...
    image
    Charlton Life, Charlton Fans...
    image

    @Airman Brown @Redhenry
    image

    @nth london addick
    image

    @DOUCHER
    image

    AND Sorry for rinsing people's data...

    @DOUCHER being likened to tommy wiseau is one of the most accurate comparisons on this thread
    Oh Hi Mark.
    If a lot of people love each other, the world would be a better place to live.
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    Yeah no way has Murray delivered a series of false statements just to stop protests.

    I also believe Murray will want to be around under the new ownership. so pissing off fans just before that happens wouldn't be the smartest move.

    He has lost a lot of respect for sticking up for KM/RD, and IMO, should have distanced himself from them rather than continue to be the mouthpiece because it's only creating problems for him.
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,814
    Protests at the valley have been effective, but less so recently. A combination of a lack of numbers for a big protest, a lack of people to really protest against and a lack of ideas have produced a bit of a vacuum.

    Protests at the Valley have always been more about the media cover having an effect on RD rather than a direct effect.
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,457
    TelMc32 said:

    Redhenry said:

    Taxi_Lad said:

    All the doom merchants saying he won’t sell til someone pays him £xxx needs to remember the club is losing (ergo RD) £1m a Month
    He will sell soon. He’s a lot of things but where money is concerned he ain’t daft

    But he is not "losing" is he. I thought he was "loaning" the club the money it needs each month and then charging interest on top?
    But he can't keep bumping up the asking price to cover those losses... or he could but then no-one will buy.
    They don't look like they are breaking the doors down now to buy so who knows what RD is asking for.
    He has lowered it to 40 mill apparently. Still two left in slightly different bids. Neither been accepted as far as I know
    That’s at least £15m over the top. I’d hope that it would at least include the £7m owed to former directors, NO additional, incremental payments to RD and a complete clean slate on his “friendly debt”. Anything other than that and someone is way out of kilter (no Scottish link there), with the business of buying football clubs.
    If think the incremental payments in this scenario probably work something like:

    £20 million now
    £5 million on promotion to champ*
    £10 million on promotion to premier league*
    Up-to £5 in sell-on and performance payments**

    *within a certain timescale
    **e.g. Gomez payments/sell-ons from Liverpool, etc.
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    I’m so glad to have @DOUCHER as my best friend andiloveairmanbrownsomuch
  • andynelson
    andynelson Posts: 1,951

    Murray has made public statements which have turned out to be false. They are in VOTV. What is the difference between that and lying?

    He has to know they are untrue when he makes them for him to be lying. Even the belief they are untrue is largely or entirely based on things people post here under pseudonyms (as I am, but I'm not concealing my identity). I am not criticising anyone, but people need to calm down a bit. Things have moved backwards as well as forwards in this saga. Things that were true or appeared to be true become untrue or turn out not to have been.

    dickplumb said:

    I think Charlton fans are being lied to by Murray and Duchatelet. We are being played like a fiddle and I am sick of it. The two bids were supposed to be agreed months ago. Now we hear that no bids have been agreed. What the fuck is happening?

    Murray has no medium or long-term interest in making statements that turn out not to be true. He would have been better off personally saying nothing at all. Duchatelet is just mad. Even if they were capable of crafting a conspiracy between them, it's hard to see Duchatelet would have expensive lawyers and accountants running around on the clock for months in order to deceive supporters.

    But he was (quite rightly) backed into a corner by the threat of the CARD protest - wasn't it meant to be calling for him to talk to the crowd? So I guess he had to say something. He just said enough to stop further protests.
    So are protests at The Valley effective or not effective? I can't keep up. Murray likely wants to void exposing the extent to which he is now regarded as an enemy, probably because he is keen to sell himself as the man the fans trust to new owners. However, you can't explain all of his statements since January 20th on the basis of an aborted protest that day. Indeed, fewer and fewer people believe him anyway.
    OK I'll put it another way. Murray has made statements which he hoped might be true. Slightly different from knowing they weren't true.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,742

    TelMc32 said:

    Redhenry said:

    Taxi_Lad said:

    All the doom merchants saying he won’t sell til someone pays him £xxx needs to remember the club is losing (ergo RD) £1m a Month
    He will sell soon. He’s a lot of things but where money is concerned he ain’t daft

    But he is not "losing" is he. I thought he was "loaning" the club the money it needs each month and then charging interest on top?
    But he can't keep bumping up the asking price to cover those losses... or he could but then no-one will buy.
    They don't look like they are breaking the doors down now to buy so who knows what RD is asking for.
    He has lowered it to 40 mill apparently. Still two left in slightly different bids. Neither been accepted as far as I know
    That’s at least £15m over the top. I’d hope that it would at least include the £7m owed to former directors, NO additional, incremental payments to RD and a complete clean slate on his “friendly debt”. Anything other than that and someone is way out of kilter (no Scottish link there), with the business of buying football clubs.
    If think the incremental payments in this scenario probably work something like:

    £20 million now
    £5 million on promotion to champ*
    £10 million on promotion to premier league*
    Up-to £5 in sell-on and performance payments**

    *within a certain timescale
    **e.g. Gomez payments/sell-ons from Liverpool, etc.
    Probably true and certainly in line with rumour, but it's not clear why you'd pay RD anything for a promotion to the Championship after a season which you'd funded, particularly since the extra revenue at that level is likely to be swallowed up by extra costs. I can see the argument if we are promoted this season.
  • Chrispy51
    Chrispy51 Posts: 472

    TelMc32 said:

    Redhenry said:

    Taxi_Lad said:

    All the doom merchants saying he won’t sell til someone pays him £xxx needs to remember the club is losing (ergo RD) £1m a Month
    He will sell soon. He’s a lot of things but where money is concerned he ain’t daft

    But he is not "losing" is he. I thought he was "loaning" the club the money it needs each month and then charging interest on top?
    But he can't keep bumping up the asking price to cover those losses... or he could but then no-one will buy.
    They don't look like they are breaking the doors down now to buy so who knows what RD is asking for.
    He has lowered it to 40 mill apparently. Still two left in slightly different bids. Neither been accepted as far as I know
    That’s at least £15m over the top. I’d hope that it would at least include the £7m owed to former directors, NO additional, incremental payments to RD and a complete clean slate on his “friendly debt”. Anything other than that and someone is way out of kilter (no Scottish link there), with the business of buying football clubs.
    If think the incremental payments in this scenario probably work something like:

    £20 million now
    £5 million on promotion to champ*
    £10 million on promotion to premier league*
    Up-to £5 in sell-on and performance payments**

    *within a certain timescale
    **e.g. Gomez payments/sell-ons from Liverpool, etc.
    I would think he would be aiming for a proportion of the profit made from the sale of any RD-era purchase, as well as a proportion of the sale of any youth player that has made his debut during RD's tenure as owner.
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,457

    TelMc32 said:

    Redhenry said:

    Taxi_Lad said:

    All the doom merchants saying he won’t sell til someone pays him £xxx needs to remember the club is losing (ergo RD) £1m a Month
    He will sell soon. He’s a lot of things but where money is concerned he ain’t daft

    But he is not "losing" is he. I thought he was "loaning" the club the money it needs each month and then charging interest on top?
    But he can't keep bumping up the asking price to cover those losses... or he could but then no-one will buy.
    They don't look like they are breaking the doors down now to buy so who knows what RD is asking for.
    He has lowered it to 40 mill apparently. Still two left in slightly different bids. Neither been accepted as far as I know
    That’s at least £15m over the top. I’d hope that it would at least include the £7m owed to former directors, NO additional, incremental payments to RD and a complete clean slate on his “friendly debt”. Anything other than that and someone is way out of kilter (no Scottish link there), with the business of buying football clubs.
    If think the incremental payments in this scenario probably work something like:

    £20 million now
    £5 million on promotion to champ*
    £10 million on promotion to premier league*
    Up-to £5 in sell-on and performance payments**

    *within a certain timescale
    **e.g. Gomez payments/sell-ons from Liverpool, etc.
    Probably true and certainly in line with rumour, but it's not clear why you'd pay RD anything for a promotion to the Championship after a season which you'd funded, particularly since the extra revenue at that level is likely to be swallowed up by extra costs. I can see the argument if we are promoted this season.
    Couldn't agree more, there is no reason why you'd pay Roland anything for future promotions that aren't because of anything Roland has done (I think we'd all agree it would be despite of what he's done), but I don't think that will stop him from trying to demand it somehow.

    I imagine that's why this is dragging out, it'll be not only arguments over what monies Roland has any right to claim, but home much and in what timescales.
  • lolwray
    lolwray Posts: 4,902

    TelMc32 said:

    Redhenry said:

    Taxi_Lad said:

    All the doom merchants saying he won’t sell til someone pays him £xxx needs to remember the club is losing (ergo RD) £1m a Month
    He will sell soon. He’s a lot of things but where money is concerned he ain’t daft

    But he is not "losing" is he. I thought he was "loaning" the club the money it needs each month and then charging interest on top?
    But he can't keep bumping up the asking price to cover those losses... or he could but then no-one will buy.
    They don't look like they are breaking the doors down now to buy so who knows what RD is asking for.
    He has lowered it to 40 mill apparently. Still two left in slightly different bids. Neither been accepted as far as I know
    That’s at least £15m over the top. I’d hope that it would at least include the £7m owed to former directors, NO additional, incremental payments to RD and a complete clean slate on his “friendly debt”. Anything other than that and someone is way out of kilter (no Scottish link there), with the business of buying football clubs.
    If think the incremental payments in this scenario probably work something like:

    £20 million now
    £5 million on promotion to champ*
    £10 million on promotion to premier league*
    Up-to £5 in sell-on and performance payments**

    *within a certain timescale
    **e.g. Gomez payments/sell-ons from Liverpool, etc.
    Probably true and certainly in line with rumour, but it's not clear why you'd pay RD anything for a promotion to the Championship after a season which you'd funded, particularly since the extra revenue at that level is likely to be swallowed up by extra costs. I can see the argument if we are promoted this season.
    which is why we ll know nothing more until the play offs finish or we dont make the play offs whichever is the sooner
  • Manicmania
    Manicmania Posts: 1,594
    Football clubs must be the only type of business where the future success is factored into the value in that way - imagine if somebody had bought toys r us and then had to pay x amount extra a couple of years later if the new company made a profit - it'd be "err no - you ran the company into the ground... if we then make it successful by investing, putting the right people in place and the correct strategy to make the business work and it does, it don't entitle you to a share in the profit- jog on"
  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,056

    TelMc32 said:

    Redhenry said:

    Taxi_Lad said:

    All the doom merchants saying he won’t sell til someone pays him £xxx needs to remember the club is losing (ergo RD) £1m a Month
    He will sell soon. He’s a lot of things but where money is concerned he ain’t daft

    But he is not "losing" is he. I thought he was "loaning" the club the money it needs each month and then charging interest on top?
    But he can't keep bumping up the asking price to cover those losses... or he could but then no-one will buy.
    They don't look like they are breaking the doors down now to buy so who knows what RD is asking for.
    He has lowered it to 40 mill apparently. Still two left in slightly different bids. Neither been accepted as far as I know
    That’s at least £15m over the top. I’d hope that it would at least include the £7m owed to former directors, NO additional, incremental payments to RD and a complete clean slate on his “friendly debt”. Anything other than that and someone is way out of kilter (no Scottish link there), with the business of buying football clubs.
    If think the incremental payments in this scenario probably work something like:

    £20 million now
    £5 million on promotion to champ*
    £10 million on promotion to premier league*
    Up-to £5 in sell-on and performance payments**

    *within a certain timescale
    **e.g. Gomez payments/sell-ons from Liverpool, etc.
    I might stretch to allowing him some form of sell on for Gomez, JBG (shame they apparently neglected to think highly enough of Pope to include one). Those are deals done during his tenure.

    However, anything post-RD is going to be achieved with the backing of new owners and will be in spite of him and his regime, not because of him. You might stretch yourself a little further and maybe allow a small increment for promotion to the Championship within 2 years, but nothing more.
  • CharltonKerry
    CharltonKerry Posts: 2,960

    Football clubs must be the only type of business where the future success is factored into the value in that way - imagine if somebody had bought toys r us and then had to pay x amount extra a couple of years later if the new company made a profit - it'd be "err no - you ran the company into the ground... if we then make it successful by investing, putting the right people in place and the correct strategy to make the business work and it does, it don't entitle you to a share in the profit- jog on"

    No they are not, I own a refrigeration company who got maintenance contracts some lasting for 5 years, if I sold then the value / expected profit of these future maintenance would certainly be incorporated into the sales price. So yes future success is priced in many businesses sales, it’s can also be known as good will.
  • Manicmania
    Manicmania Posts: 1,594
    Yes but how do you translate that to if we get into the premiership in a couple of years they'd owe Roland more money?

    That's like saying if the new owners make a lucrative deal/contract a year after buying then the previous owners earn an extra payment?
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,862
    Re thread Title, has this week become next week yet, or is next week now this week, or has this week/next week become last week ?
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,811
    £5m on promotion to the Championship, is roughly the uptick in TV cash you get.

    If true, what a fucking piss take to pay him for a new owners success to subsides his failure.
This discussion has been closed.