Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The General Election - June 8th 2017

15051535556320

Comments

  • Re-May... On the local radio the other night (radio berks) they had an election phone in, 90% of her constituents slagged her off for her local performance . To be fair the interviewer asked a little bit about each caller to ensure there was a balanced view. As its bbc radio berks i was surprised this wasn't mentioned in the next few days.

    She won her seat with 66% of the vote last time (nearest challenger was Labour with 12%) so I'm sure she'll be safe - but wouldn't it just be typical of the clusterf**k that seems to be British politics on all sides at the moment if the PM
    and Brexit negotiator in chief lost her seat !
  • Perhaps should have left it at gosssip, clearly they are spooked and fear losing face to the electorate, as the Downing Street dinner stuff has hit the English press.
  • se9addick said:

    Re-May... On the local radio the other night (radio berks) they had an election phone in, 90% of her constituents slagged her off for her local performance . To be fair the interviewer asked a little bit about each caller to ensure there was a balanced view. As its bbc radio berks i was surprised this wasn't mentioned in the next few days.

    She won her seat with 66% of the vote last time (nearest challenger was Labour with 12%) so I'm sure she'll be safe - but wouldn't it just be typical of the clusterf**k that seems to be British politics on all sides at the moment if the PM
    and Brexit negotiator in chief lost her seat !
    I know.. But its a typical area where rven the social l misfits think their special.
  • I have equal respect for @Chizz, @Fiiish on one side, and @Dippenhall and @cafcfan on the other. A shame therefore to see them at loggerheads.

    What swings me towards the Chizz/Fiiish viewpoint is this:

    If there is one thing we ought to have learnt in the last 30 years is that if you ask ordinary working people to put their future wellbeing in the hands of the UK financial services industry, they will be done like kippers. I think its Ok to have top ups from the private sector for people like you two who are smart enough both to see the value of putting your money away and probably to avoid the worst excesses. But to insist the mass of ordinary people depend on private contingency, well; I guess it depends on whether you think we should have a society more like the USA or like Germany. No prizes for guessing where my vote goes.

    Nice to see you in bromance mode prague... Can you count me in.
  • I have equal respect for @Chizz, @Fiiish on one side, and @Dippenhall and @cafcfan on the other. A shame therefore to see them at loggerheads.

    What swings me towards the Chizz/Fiiish viewpoint is this:

    If there is one thing we ought to have learnt in the last 30 years is that if you ask ordinary working people to put their future wellbeing in the hands of the UK financial services industry, they will be done like kippers. I think its Ok to have top ups from the private sector for people like you two who are smart enough both to see the value of putting your money away and probably to avoid the worst excesses. But to insist the mass of ordinary people depend on private contingency, well; I guess it depends on whether you think we should have a society more like the USA or like Germany. No prizes for guessing where my vote goes.

    Nice to see you in bromance mode prague... Can you count me in.
    Eh?

  • May is just a follow on from the other useless article- Cameron.
    He took us into a referendum to keep his own job. A gamble to protect him- he lost- we lost.
    Nothing that was said in the EU referendum debate- on both sides, were vaguely near the issues we now are told about.
    Its politicians- cannot be trusted.
  • What like devaluation and inflation already hitting the less well off in the pocket, and the absence of anything like the trade deal brexiteers suggested would be achievable looking likely?
  • Sponsored links:


  • I have equal respect for @Chizz, @Fiiish on one side, and @Dippenhall and @cafcfan on the other. A shame therefore to see them at loggerheads.

    What swings me towards the Chizz/Fiiish viewpoint is this:

    If there is one thing we ought to have learnt in the last 30 years is that if you ask ordinary working people to put their future wellbeing in the hands of the UK financial services industry, they will be done like kippers. I think its Ok to have top ups from the private sector for people like you two who are smart enough both to see the value of putting your money away and probably to avoid the worst excesses. But to insist the mass of ordinary people depend on private contingency, well; I guess it depends on whether you think we should have a society more like the USA or like Germany. No prizes for guessing where my vote goes.

    Nice to see you in bromance mode prague... Can you count me in.
    Eh?

    Lighten up
  • I have equal respect for @Chizz, @Fiiish on one side, and @Dippenhall and @cafcfan on the other. A shame therefore to see them at loggerheads.

    What swings me towards the Chizz/Fiiish viewpoint is this:

    If there is one thing we ought to have learnt in the last 30 years is that if you ask ordinary working people to put their future wellbeing in the hands of the UK financial services industry, they will be done like kippers. I think its Ok to have top ups from the private sector for people like you two who are smart enough both to see the value of putting your money away and probably to avoid the worst excesses. But to insist the mass of ordinary people depend on private contingency, well; I guess it depends on whether you think we should have a society more like the USA or like Germany. No prizes for guessing where my vote goes.

    Nice to see you in bromance mode prague... Can you count me in.
    Eh?

    Lighten up
    Whatever you say, Chips. But since you are here, i am curious how you feel to find yourself on the same side of the arguments here as Chizz, Fiiish, Bournemouth, Charlton Madrid, Muttley (to name just some of the Remainers you tried to troll) and I. Don't you recall us trying to point out to you who the politicians are whom you were backing with such mindless aggression on the Brexit thread?

    Never mind, mate. You've got your country back. Now you can look forward to strong and stable leadership for the next 5 years. What a time to be alive.



  • Blimey. The most significant thing about this tweet is the author of it.
  • razil said:

    She just doesn't seem to have the metal for the top job, I've had concerns from day 1 but today confirms it

    Could've been worse. Could've been Andrea Leadsom.


  • Blimey. The most significant thing about this tweet is the author of it.
    Glad to see other dyed in the blue Tories like me are seeing May and her merry men for the frauds they are.
  • I have equal respect for @Chizz, @Fiiish on one side, and @Dippenhall and @cafcfan on the other. A shame therefore to see them at loggerheads.

    What swings me towards the Chizz/Fiiish viewpoint is this:

    If there is one thing we ought to have learnt in the last 30 years is that if you ask ordinary working people to put their future wellbeing in the hands of the UK financial services industry, they will be done like kippers. I think its Ok to have top ups from the private sector for people like you two who are smart enough both to see the value of putting your money away and probably to avoid the worst excesses. But to insist the mass of ordinary people depend on private contingency, well; I guess it depends on whether you think we should have a society more like the USA or like Germany. No prizes for guessing where my vote goes.

    Nice to see you in bromance mode prague... Can you count me in.
    Eh?

    Lighten up
    Whatever you say, Chips. But since you are here, i am curious how you feel to find yourself on the same side of the arguments here as Chizz, Fiiish, Bournemouth, Charlton Madrid, Muttley (to name just some of the Remainers you tried to troll) and I. Don't you recall us trying to point out to you who the politicians are whom you were backing with such mindless aggression on the Brexit thread?

    Never mind, mate. You've got your country back. Now you can look forward to strong and stable leadership for the next 5 years. What a time to be alive.

    Ffs grow up


  • Blimey. The most significant thing about this tweet is the author of it.
    Yes and he is quite wrong.
    There was never going to be a polite negotiation over leaving the EU. The EU is far bigger and more powerful than the UK and exists to perpetuate itself through the four freedoms.
    There is no reason for the EU to give the UK a good deal and every reason not to. It really makes no difference how 'positive' 'friendly' or 'conciliatory' we are,they are out to screw the UK.
    We would be better off walking away from the talks and getting on with working out our future free from the illusion that we can strike a deal with the EU bureaucracy.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Southbank said:



    Blimey. The most significant thing about this tweet is the author of it.
    Yes and he is quite wrong.
    There was never going to be a polite negotiation over leaving the EU. The EU is far bigger and more powerful than the UK and exists to perpetuate itself through the four freedoms.
    There is no reason for the EU to give the UK a good deal and every reason not to. It really makes no difference how 'positive' 'friendly' or 'conciliatory' we are,they are out to screw the UK.
    We would be better off walking away from the talks and getting on with working out our future free from the illusion that we can strike a deal with the EU bureaucracy.
    If that were true why doesn't May just revoke the European Communities Act straight away, from which point there would be no law compelling us from an EU perspective to do anything?

    After all, no deal is better than a bad deal, apparently.

    Or maybe, and in fact far more likely, you're wrong and you have absolutely no idea what the EU wants.
  • Southbank said:



    Blimey. The most significant thing about this tweet is the author of it.
    Yes and he is quite wrong.
    There was never going to be a polite negotiation over leaving the EU. The EU is far bigger and more powerful than the UK and exists to perpetuate itself through the four freedoms.
    There is no reason for the EU to give the UK a good deal and every reason not to. It really makes no difference how 'positive' 'friendly' or 'conciliatory' we are,they are out to screw the UK.
    We would be better off walking away from the talks and getting on with working out our future free from the illusion that we can strike a deal with the EU bureaucracy.
    I think this is what is going to happen anyway, no deal (being better than a 'bad' deal), so save time and get it over with.
    Except Theresa May really thinks that threatening to ban the export of shortbread and source the sparkling wine from Chile will bring the Europeans round, and she will drag out her failure for two or three years.
  • She won't do that though, as she has to look like she's trying, else the economy is going to crash hard.
  • 25 + 5 = 30
    30 * 10 = 300
  • 7+5 times 25
  • 5+1*25 =150 then 9-7 =2. *150 =300
  • 9*7=63 *5=315 - 25+10=300
  • 9*25=215 10*7+5 =300
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!