Worst Duchatelet Era 18

daveydanger

cafc_harry said:

daveydanger said:

Thuram

Nego
Johnson
Williams
Chicksen (possibly harsh)

Harriott
Ceballos
Lepoint
Ba

Church
Makienok


Coach: Wim De Corte (hipsters choice)

Chicksen and Harriott, even Church are ridiculous choices. Did you not watch the first 2 years he owned us? Not even close to the worst.

Yep had a season ticket. Interested to know your picks for a worse striker than Church and worse winger than Harriott

daveydanger

rememberbillybonds said:

Surely Koc and Fanni must be included. Just about sums it all up.

Fanni was an excellent defender. Silky.

MrLargo

LenGlover said:

rememberbillybonds said:

Being serious, all the years I have watched Charlton by miles the worst performance by anyone is given to Lepoint..

Tom Hovi? El Khalaj (? spelling) Ben Reeves every week

Think you're right Len, they were worse. However, I did actually laugh out loud whilst watching Lepoint, never done that before or since.

daveydanger

MrLargo said:

daveydanger said:

Polish Pete doesn't qualify imo - one appearance as sub, where i'm not certain he even did anything particularly remarkable.

4 minutes of football in return for an £800k transfer fee and a 4 and a half year contract that we tore up less than half way through. He should be first name on the teamsheet, and Simon Church shouldn't be anywhere near it.

‘Worse’ striker than Church please.

Yes - Polish Pete was a disaster of a purchase, but not sure you can rate someone you’ve basically never seen play.

Polish Pete got himself a very decent haul in Holland and the Belgian top-flight. Would you back Simon Church to do that? Cos I wouldn’t.

maidstone_addick

daveydanger said:

rememberbillybonds said:

Surely Koc and Fanni must be included. Just about sums it all up.

Fanni was an excellent defender. Silky.

Dunno, I thought Fanni was a bit hairy at times.

cafc_harry

daveydanger said:

cafc_harry said:

daveydanger said:

Thuram

Nego
Johnson
Williams
Chicksen (possibly harsh)

Harriott
Ceballos
Lepoint
Ba

Church
Makienok


Coach: Wim De Corte (hipsters choice)

Chicksen and Harriott, even Church are ridiculous choices. Did you not watch the first 2 years he owned us? Not even close to the worst.

Yep had a season ticket. Interested to know your picks for a worse striker than Church and worse winger than Harriott

Vaz Te, Koc, Tudgay.

ForeverAddickted

Dazzler21 said:

Was Evina better or worse than Page?

Evina was a Chris Powell signing just before we signed Wiggins

ForeverAddickted

Thuram
Nego | Williams | Onyewu | Page
Lepoint | Ba
Koc | Petrucci | Bergdich
Dodoo

cantersaddick

rememberbillybonds said:

Surely Koc and Fanni must be included. Just about sums it all up.

The fact that we have had Johnson Suk-young Fanni and Koc in the last few years is about the one upside of this regime. 10/10 in a game of innuendo bingo.

MrLargo

daveydanger said:

MrLargo said:

daveydanger said:

Polish Pete doesn't qualify imo - one appearance as sub, where i'm not certain he even did anything particularly remarkable.

4 minutes of football in return for an £800k transfer fee and a 4 and a half year contract that we tore up less than half way through. He should be first name on the teamsheet, and Simon Church shouldn't be anywhere near it.

‘Worse’ striker than Church please.

Yes - Polish Pete was a disaster of a purchase, but not sure you can rate someone you’ve basically never seen play.

Polish Pete got himself a very decent haul in Holland and the Belgian top-flight. Would you back Simon Church to do that? Cos I wouldn’t.

And Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink got a very decent haul for Chelsea and Leeds, but we paid him £30k a week to contribute very little except waddling round the pitch like a fat J-Lo.

Powell, Riga, Peeters, Luzon and Fraeye - none of them were willing to play Polish Pete, all of them fielded Church at some point. Not saying Church was brilliant, but at least he was on the pitch rather than just draining vast amounts of cash in return for nothing.

daveydanger

cafc_harry said:

daveydanger said:

cafc_harry said:

daveydanger said:

Thuram

Nego
Johnson
Williams
Chicksen (possibly harsh)

Harriott
Ceballos
Lepoint
Ba

Church
Makienok


Coach: Wim De Corte (hipsters choice)

Chicksen and Harriott, even Church are ridiculous choices. Did you not watch the first 2 years he owned us? Not even close to the worst.

Yep had a season ticket. Interested to know your picks for a worse striker than Church and worse winger than Harriott

Vaz Te, Koc, Tudgay.

1. Nope.
2. Impossible to say, plus not a striker.
3.Nope

ForeverAddickted

daveydanger said:

cafc_harry said:

daveydanger said:

cafc_harry said:

daveydanger said:

Thuram

Nego
Johnson
Williams
Chicksen (possibly harsh)

Harriott
Ceballos
Lepoint
Ba

Church
Makienok


Coach: Wim De Corte (hipsters choice)

Chicksen and Harriott, even Church are ridiculous choices. Did you not watch the first 2 years he owned us? Not even close to the worst.

Yep had a season ticket. Interested to know your picks for a worse striker than Church and worse winger than Harriott

Vaz Te, Koc, Tudgay.

Nope, nope.

You'd seriously say that Koc is better than Church?

daveydanger

ForeverAddickted said:

daveydanger said:

cafc_harry said:

daveydanger said:

cafc_harry said:

daveydanger said:

Thuram

Nego
Johnson
Williams
Chicksen (possibly harsh)

Harriott
Ceballos
Lepoint
Ba

Church
Makienok


Coach: Wim De Corte (hipsters choice)

Chicksen and Harriott, even Church are ridiculous choices. Did you not watch the first 2 years he owned us? Not even close to the worst.

Yep had a season ticket. Interested to know your picks for a worse striker than Church and worse winger than Harriott

Vaz Te, Koc, Tudgay.

Nope, nope.

You'd seriously say that Koc is better than Church?

Edited - missed that you’d included him

daveydanger

MrLargo said:

daveydanger said:

MrLargo said:

daveydanger said:

Polish Pete doesn't qualify imo - one appearance as sub, where i'm not certain he even did anything particularly remarkable.

4 minutes of football in return for an £800k transfer fee and a 4 and a half year contract that we tore up less than half way through. He should be first name on the teamsheet, and Simon Church shouldn't be anywhere near it.

‘Worse’ striker than Church please.

Yes - Polish Pete was a disaster of a purchase, but not sure you can rate someone you’ve basically never seen play.

Polish Pete got himself a very decent haul in Holland and the Belgian top-flight. Would you back Simon Church to do that? Cos I wouldn’t.

And Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink got a very decent haul for Chelsea and Leeds, but we paid him £30k a week to contribute very little except waddling round the pitch like a fat J-Lo.

Powell, Riga, Peeters, Luzon and Fraeye - none of them were willing to play Polish Pete, all of them fielded Church at some point. Not saying Church was brilliant, but at least he was on the pitch rather than just draining vast amounts of cash in return for nothing.

Sorry man, you’ve disproved your argument by using a player who actually played, and was demonstrably bad, as an example.

Scoham

I saw Koc and Polish Pete play against Brighton u21s. They were signed to play for the first team and in that one game it was clear why they didn't (PPs few minutes aside). It's not that they looked bad, they just didn't stand out as anything special compared to the rest of the u21s.

cafc_harry

Koc is clearly a worse winger than Harriott, McAleny if you want another? Obviously done ok since but awful for us.

MrLargo

daveydanger said:

MrLargo said:

daveydanger said:

MrLargo said:

daveydanger said:

Polish Pete doesn't qualify imo - one appearance as sub, where i'm not certain he even did anything particularly remarkable.

4 minutes of football in return for an £800k transfer fee and a 4 and a half year contract that we tore up less than half way through. He should be first name on the teamsheet, and Simon Church shouldn't be anywhere near it.

‘Worse’ striker than Church please.

Yes - Polish Pete was a disaster of a purchase, but not sure you can rate someone you’ve basically never seen play.

Polish Pete got himself a very decent haul in Holland and the Belgian top-flight. Would you back Simon Church to do that? Cos I wouldn’t.

And Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink got a very decent haul for Chelsea and Leeds, but we paid him £30k a week to contribute very little except waddling round the pitch like a fat J-Lo.

Powell, Riga, Peeters, Luzon and Fraeye - none of them were willing to play Polish Pete, all of them fielded Church at some point. Not saying Church was brilliant, but at least he was on the pitch rather than just draining vast amounts of cash in return for nothing.

Sorry man, you’ve disproved your argument by using a player who actually played, and was demonstrably bad, as an example.

How can a player who turned out for us over 50 times have had a more negative effect on our fortunes than someone who played for 4 minutes and had to be paid off to leave.

Piotr was so bad that Church kept him out of the team.

Busterblitz

rememberbillybonds said:

Being serious, all the years I have watched Charlton by miles the worst performance by anyone is given to Lepoint..

That Cardiff away performance...Luckily Tony was on fire at that point

cafcnick1992

Anyone who thinks Reza was better than Church needs their head checked.

One of the worst strikers we've had since I've been alive. No strength, positional awareness, couldn't jump or shoot.

Sheffield Wednesday away (3-0) lives long in the memory.

Stu_of_Kunming

daveydanger said:

MrLargo said:

daveydanger said:

MrLargo said:

daveydanger said:

Polish Pete doesn't qualify imo - one appearance as sub, where i'm not certain he even did anything particularly remarkable.

4 minutes of football in return for an £800k transfer fee and a 4 and a half year contract that we tore up less than half way through. He should be first name on the teamsheet, and Simon Church shouldn't be anywhere near it.

‘Worse’ striker than Church please.

Yes - Polish Pete was a disaster of a purchase, but not sure you can rate someone you’ve basically never seen play.

Polish Pete got himself a very decent haul in Holland and the Belgian top-flight. Would you back Simon Church to do that? Cos I wouldn’t.

And Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink got a very decent haul for Chelsea and Leeds, but we paid him £30k a week to contribute very little except waddling round the pitch like a fat J-Lo.

Powell, Riga, Peeters, Luzon and Fraeye - none of them were willing to play Polish Pete, all of them fielded Church at some point. Not saying Church was brilliant, but at least he was on the pitch rather than just draining vast amounts of cash in return for nothing.

Sorry man, you’ve disproved your argument by using a player who actually played, and was demonstrably bad, as an example.

There's a reason he didn't play.

wmcf123

Sarr

daveydanger

cafcnick1992 said:

Anyone who thinks Reza was better than Church needs their head checked.

One of the worst strikers we've had since I've been alive. No strength, positional awareness, couldn't jump or shoot.

Sheffield Wednesday away (3-0) lives long in the memory.

Agreed - Reza was flimsy and ineffective. He had about the same goals per game as Church, about 1 in 10.

Reza did score one memorable curler in the top corner, and scored 20 goals in the Dutch top flight last season (for what that’s worth).

daveydanger

MrLargo said:

daveydanger said:

MrLargo said:

daveydanger said:

MrLargo said:

daveydanger said:

Polish Pete doesn't qualify imo - one appearance as sub, where i'm not certain he even did anything particularly remarkable.

4 minutes of football in return for an £800k transfer fee and a 4 and a half year contract that we tore up less than half way through. He should be first name on the teamsheet, and Simon Church shouldn't be anywhere near it.

‘Worse’ striker than Church please.

Yes - Polish Pete was a disaster of a purchase, but not sure you can rate someone you’ve basically never seen play.

Polish Pete got himself a very decent haul in Holland and the Belgian top-flight. Would you back Simon Church to do that? Cos I wouldn’t.

And Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink got a very decent haul for Chelsea and Leeds, but we paid him £30k a week to contribute very little except waddling round the pitch like a fat J-Lo.

Powell, Riga, Peeters, Luzon and Fraeye - none of them were willing to play Polish Pete, all of them fielded Church at some point. Not saying Church was brilliant, but at least he was on the pitch rather than just draining vast amounts of cash in return for nothing.

Sorry man, you’ve disproved your argument by using a player who actually played, and was demonstrably bad, as an example.

How can a player who turned out for us over 50 times have had a more negative effect on our fortunes than someone who played for 4 minutes and had to be paid off to leave.

Piotr was so bad that Church kept him out of the team.

What can I say - I didn’t make the rules.

“What's the worst team you can pick from the players that have played under the Duchatalet regime?”

I have no doubt he was most probably a shit as the other Driesen discoveries.

No idea why I care anyway - the whole thing has been such an unmitigated disaster that I’d like to erase the entire godforsaken period from my memory.