Utter insanity or a good way to reduce congestion?
52% of motorists polled didn't know anything about ERA's.
IMO The whole concept is a huge loss of life disaster waiting to happen, never mind the thousands of mini disasters (less than what, 6 dead at a time?) that will drip feed into the press.
(Agh - cant change category!)
1
Comments
So, breakdowns may as well stop in the inside lane.
A (one car-ish) lay by every 1.5 miles
On a related note, drivers that ignore red 'X's and use closed lanes should get 6 points and a hefty fine. There are enough cameras on our motorways that I can't believe this isn't better enforced. It surely wouldn't be hard.
https://www.petrolprices.com/news/get-fined-ignoring-red-x-motorway/
Honestly dont understand that... Surely the red X is to tell you that your coming up to a lane closure and that there will be cones to force you over when you get to the incident
If you move over when your first warned (usually a mile or two before you get to the incident) then there is going to be an empty lane for no reason?
So, you're the numpty that waits until the last minute before trying to change lane, thus making lane 2 drivers put on the anchors & hence the stream of break lights that causes all the tailbacks when nothing has happened.
maybe trying being a bit more thoughtful of why the BIG red X is there & move over when asked.......then the rest of us wont be sitting in tailbacks for no reason.
Cars are so much more reliable these days - how often do you actually see someone stranded on the hard shoulder? And is it more likely than on a 2 lane A-Road where the speed limit could be 60 mph but visibility for following traffic will be much worse, and there will be no option to go around?
The bit that isnt open is obviously going to be coned off
That's a joke btw, hate lane hoggers, but before smart motorways may become a success driving habits need to change. Red crosses, speed limits, driving in the correct lane: these all add up.
Fines, points, educational courses are useful tools, but the bottom line is it is the death rate that talks unfortunately...and The Highways Agency dont help themselves alot of the time either.
This happened a couple of weeks ago. They're using the hard shoulder as a lane ( in prep for a smart motorway I think)
The car broke down only for the lorry driver to crash straight into it shortly after.
These days, people think they're smart if they can trick you into thinking something is smart by taking a bad idea and changing its name.
Given how tight local authorities are, rightly, on utility contractors getting their roadworks guarding right, often to the point of overkill. It is absolute insanity they now expect recovery workers to do what is already a really dangerous job with the aid of assumption that some of the ignorant pricks that use our motorways will move over and let them work because a gantry displays a red X. Also assuming I'd someone is stupid enough to run out of fuel that they would have the sense to pull in leaving enough space for a recovery vehicle to get in front of them. All this next to 70 plus mph vehicular traffic.
Its cost cutting disguised as smart motorways.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000dtqv/panorama-britains-killer-motorways