A distinguished panel of experts at Cricinfo, and separately the readers, came up with identical lists of the best test XI of the last 25 years.
1. Matthew Hayden
2. Virender Sehwag
3. Ricky Ponting
4. Sachin Tendulkar
5. Brian Lara
6. Jacques Kallis
7. Adam Gilchrist (wk)
8. Wasim Akram
9. Shane Warne
10. Muttiah Muralitharan
11. Glenn McGrath
Some massive names in there, and some massive names missing out. Sure I'd like a place for sangakkara and Dravidian, but who will miss out? What if you only wanted one spinner? Steyn possibly instead of Murali.
Really difficult to argue with that list and not an Englishman in sight which underlines our inconsistency over the period, in fact any period! So let's name our English XI of that era to play this team:
1) Cook 2) Trescothick 3) Vaughn 4) Root 5) Pieterson (added through gritted teeth) 6) Bell 7) Flintoff 8) Prior 9) Swann 10) Broad 11) Anderson
Just to clarify I have only included players whose entire Test career falls within 1993-2018 and so that's why no Atherton, Stewart etc.
Purely from the perspective of the side having that meaningful 5th bowler option (and I know that you will say you should only need four) I would bring in Stokes for Bell (much as he is/was such a classy batsman). It also gives you stability with the top four but explosiveness with KP/Stokes/Flintoff and Prior/Swann/a Broad of a former life as a batsman to wag.
It was but he was late on it. As Sangakkara said "if there is one thing that Jason Roy struggles with and is weak it is the ball that nips back in". He should know because he will have seen him enough times close up.
And it is why Roy, despite the clamour from some at times, will never make a Test batsman let alone a Test opener.
It was but he was late on it. As Sangakkara said "if there is one thing that Jason Roy struggles with and is weak it is the ball that nips back in". He should know because he will have seen him enough times close up.
And it is why Roy, despite the clamour from some at times, will never make a Test batsman let alone a Test opener.
Just want to make a point here whixh I'm sure I've said before. Very few people have been calling for Roy in the test side at 6 and I'm yet to see anyone seriously suggest he opens on tests. His record opening the batting for Surrey in the longer format is terrible. Adams nearly ruined his career (also did this to Jordan and a number of others at surrey) by forcing him to open for so long.
He is what he is. A very good limited overs batsman who on is day is another level but will be hit and miss given the way he plays.
It was but he was late on it. As Sangakkara said "if there is one thing that Jason Roy struggles with and is weak it is the ball that nips back in". He should know because he will have seen him enough times close up.
And it is why Roy, despite the clamour from some at times, will never make a Test batsman let alone a Test opener.
Just want to make a point here whixh I'm sure I've said before. Very few people have been calling for Roy in the test side at 6 and I'm yet to see anyone seriously suggest he opens on tests. His record opening the batting for Surrey in the longer format is terrible. Adams nearly ruined his career (also did this to Jordan and a number of others at surrey) by forcing him to open for so long.
He is what he is. A very good limited overs batsman who on is day is another level but will be hit and miss given the way he plays.
Sorry Canters but you are incorrect on that count. When he got that mammoth score last year there were some (and I'm not saying you) who were suggesting that he should be given a go in the Test side. I will dig it out if I have to.
Comments
Lol well done Ali.
Still, three wickets and economy rate of 4.3
And it is why Roy, despite the clamour from some at times, will never make a Test batsman let alone a Test opener.
He is what he is. A very good limited overs batsman who on is day is another level but will be hit and miss given the way he plays.
3 of us on here have tickets for Surrey Kent next month in 20 /20 I can't wait.
A fairly simple POTM adjudication there I think