Bexley are lucky not just to have Crossy and Cloudy as players but also because of what they bring to the Club off the pitch. Cloudy is head of the Academy and has been brilliant with the Colts. He's also been a bit unlucky in his career especially when he had to spend a year with Allan Donald having his bowling action re-modelled. But he also spent the time following Trott round which has helped him immensely with his batting.
sorry, missed this. do you mean Macleod who is currently taking England apart ???
This could all go terribly wrong if we lose an early couple of wickets. It could all terribly wrong if we don't as well.
Or, looking at it the other way, i read that Macleod's century was 3rd fastest ever ? so, could we have the likes of maybe Bairstow or Roy or Hales bettering that - shame Stokes and Buttler are not playing as would have been the better candidates
That’s a very big score from the jocks. We can bat for sure but he pressure of that score I can see is going too hard early doors and losing wickets too quick.
This could all go terribly wrong if we lose an early couple of wickets. It could all terribly wrong if we don't as well.
Or, looking at it the other way, i read that Macleod's century was 3rd fastest ever ? so, could we have the likes of maybe Bairstow or Roy or Hales bettering that - shame Stokes and Buttler are not playing as would have been the better candidates
27 ball 50 for Bairstow. Whats the record for 100?
This could all go terribly wrong if we lose an early couple of wickets. It could all terribly wrong if we don't as well.
Or, looking at it the other way, i read that Macleod's century was 3rd fastest ever ? so, could we have the likes of maybe Bairstow or Roy or Hales bettering that - shame Stokes and Buttler are not playing as would have been the better candidates
27 ball 50 for Bairstow. Whats the record for 100?
This could all go terribly wrong if we lose an early couple of wickets. It could all terribly wrong if we don't as well.
Or, looking at it the other way, i read that Macleod's century was 3rd fastest ever ? so, could we have the likes of maybe Bairstow or Roy or Hales bettering that - shame Stokes and Buttler are not playing as would have been the better candidates
27 ball 50 for Bairstow. Whats the record for 100?
75 off 35
84 off 39 - JB is on for a sub 50 ball hundred here.
This could all go terribly wrong if we lose an early couple of wickets. It could all terribly wrong if we don't as well.
Or, looking at it the other way, i read that Macleod's century was 3rd fastest ever ? so, could we have the likes of maybe Bairstow or Roy or Hales bettering that - shame Stokes and Buttler are not playing as would have been the better candidates
27 ball 50 for Bairstow. Whats the record for 100?
75 off 35
84 off 39 - JB is on for a sub 50 ball hundred here.
Dear oh dear Hales. Got lucky with a review that wasn’t taken quick enough and would have been overturned then runs Root out and now flashes one straight down points throat. Looked very shaky after Roots dismissal.
Comments
Could this be England crickets Iceland moment?
281-3 off 41
371 final score.
Would be a great win, come on England.
Whats the record for 100?
apparently Buttler got 100 in 46