Never ever a penalty that. Referee gets it spot on. Even if VAR do contact the referee, he doesn't have to review it. Danny Murphy talks some shit doesn't he?!
Never ever a penalty that. Referee gets it spot on. Even if VAR do contact the referee, he doesn't have to review it. Danny Murphy talks some shit doesn't he?!
But IF VAR say it needs to be reviewed then surely he should, thats what it is there for
STEP 3 Decision or action is taken The referee decides to review the video footage on the side of the field of play before taking the appropriate action/decision, or the referee accepts the information from the VAR and takes the appropriate action/decision.
STEP 3 Decision or action is taken The referee decides to review the video footage on the side of the field of play before taking the appropriate action/decision, or the referee accepts the information from the VAR and takes the appropriate action/decision.
Exactly it says the receree accepts the infirmation a d takes the appropriate action so VAR have told him he doesnt need to review it otherwise he would have done
Comments
He could have had a shot, but he choose to dive
But just like the Henderson incident I dont know why they havent told the ref to have a lool
Genuine question as I'm not sure how the law works in that instance
That's why the headbutt on Henderson for instance wouldn't have been a penalty.
Decision or action is taken
The referee decides to review the video footage on the side of the field of play before taking the appropriate action/decision, or the referee accepts the information from the VAR and takes the appropriate action/decision.
https://football-technology.fifa.com/en/media-tiles/video-assistant-referee-var/