Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sweden v England

2456726

Comments

  • FishCostaFortune
    FishCostaFortune Posts: 10,773

    Unpopular opinion: Sterling makes us tick, we became very average when he went off.

    I somewhat agree with this. He got himself into lots of great positions yesterday, and I'm sure the stats will show he saw the ball more out of any of our attacking players.

    I wish he was just not so frenetic when he had the ball at his feet, you can get away with that for city when you're playing wider and have more space - however for England as he is paying central he has the opposition players on him straight away.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,318
    JohnBoyUK said:

    Interesting listening to Sam Allardyce this morning on TalkShite. He suggested going to a straight 4-4-2, as Sweden don't really have an attacking threat with Ibrahimovic now retired and we don't need a 3rd centre-back...and we should drop Trippier.

    Trippier has been one of our better players, if not the best so far in this tournament.

    The Swedes will sit back and play counter-attack. Its up to us to break them down. Can we do that, that is the question?
    This is the time you just wish that England had a midfield playmaker.

    At the moment I'd consider Trippier as Player of the Tournament

    Of course he wont get it as he's not a goalscorer or player with flair and trickery to wow the crowds
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,459

    So Euphoria over, we may well get through this one with a same standard performance but we need to find another gear, even two gears, before we can think about not coming up short against a better team.

    Alli, Sterling and Lingard carry so much attacking responsibility for us but are just not at world class level. I’ve no idea how we change that, without hot changing the whole for,action. RLC for Alli maybe?

    I really tried not to be too abjective about Sterling as the game progressed. I really am struggling with him though.
    He looked so lightweight and pretty much lost for a large percentage of that game
    His link up play with Kane is poor and his ability to pressurise defences and chase the ball is non existent.
    That might well be his game but he just looks like a luxury that we can ill afford as this goes on. Doubt he would be much use as an impact sub either.
    Not sure what the solution is?
    There's not a lot else in the squad.
  • JohnBoyUK said:

    Interesting listening to Sam Allardyce this morning on TalkShite. He suggested going to a straight 4-4-2, as Sweden don't really have an attacking threat with Ibrahimovic now retired and we don't need a 3rd centre-back...and we should drop Trippier.

    Trippier has been one of our better players, if not the best so far in this tournament.

    The Swedes will sit back and play counter-attack. Its up to us to break them down. Can we do that, that is the question?
    This is the time you just wish that England had a midfield playmaker.

    I'd have turned it off after that.
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,477
    Daggs said:

    I've watched us against Tunisia, Belgium and Colombia (yes ! I missed the Panama game)
    I think we have a very poor squad with little guile, ambition or skill (except Kane) Three extremely dull and lifeless performances.
    I'm pleased we continue to progress but I don't know how we are doing it.
    It was good to knock out Colombia who were just a bunch of cheating thugs who didn't deserve to win.
    Perhaps we'll bore Sweden into submission?it would actually be nice to produce a performance.

    What a happy little soul you are!
    Thanks for pissing on the fireworks misery guts.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948

    So Euphoria over, we may well get through this one with a same standard performance but we need to find another gear, even two gears, before we can think about not coming up short against a better team.

    Alli, Sterling and Lingard carry so much attacking responsibility for us but are just not at world class level. I’ve no idea how we change that, without hot changing the whole for,action. RLC for Alli maybe?

    Yeah, RLC for Alli, Rashford for Sterling and Vardy as backup.

    It just don't happen for Sterling at international level and a World Cup ain't the right place to keep giving a player chances.
  • masicat
    masicat Posts: 5,008
    Don’t think we’ve really started playing yet, but who cares. I’m giving Southgate credit for the Belgium defeat which means we will get to the final against France.
    Watched Sweden yesterday and they are piss poor. We could make changes and rest a few and still coast to the semis. I would rest Sterling for about 10 years.
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,801
    Sterling starts, we lack a passer in the midfield to open up defenses, so you need a tricky player to cause problems otherwise, and Sterling did that well, he also puts in a massive shift. Alli isn't fit, and can't see him backing up in time for Saturday.

    Sweden are a bit of a bogey side in tournaments, can't remember beating them in one, just scrappy draws up being popped open by Thomas Brolin in Stockholm in '92.
  • JohnBoyUK said:

    Interesting listening to Sam Allardyce this morning on TalkShite. He suggested going to a straight 4-4-2, as Sweden don't really have an attacking threat with Ibrahimovic now retired and we don't need a 3rd centre-back...and we should drop Trippier.

    Trippier has been one of our better players, if not the best so far in this tournament.

    The Swedes will sit back and play counter-attack. Its up to us to break them down. Can we do that, that is the question?
    This is the time you just wish that England had a midfield playmaker.

    So he would go 442 v a Sweden side who topped a group with Mexico and germany in because they have little attacking threat, yet 2 weeks ago the same Allardyce decided he would go 352 v Tunisia in a group game with TWO holding midfielders.

    https://www.givemesport.com/1332272-sam-allardyce-names-the-england-xi-he-would-start-for-world-cup-opener-v-tunisia

    Shut up and get back to your pints of wine Sam you useless fat bastard.
  • Sponsored links:



  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    I have zero time for Allardyce's try not to lose mentality.
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,801
    Could you imagine if Fat Sam was in charge for this World cup. he probably would have recalled John Terry, to play alongside Gary Cahill, and Rooney would be starting still.
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600

    JohnBoyUK said:

    Interesting listening to Sam Allardyce this morning on TalkShite. He suggested going to a straight 4-4-2, as Sweden don't really have an attacking threat with Ibrahimovic now retired and we don't need a 3rd centre-back...and we should drop Trippier.

    Trippier has been one of our better players, if not the best so far in this tournament.

    The Swedes will sit back and play counter-attack. Its up to us to break them down. Can we do that, that is the question?
    This is the time you just wish that England had a midfield playmaker.

    Allardyce can fuck right off - he'd have us playing hoofball and still have Rooney up front and we'd already be out of the tournament by now if he was in charge.
    Thank god that dinasaur isn’t england manager. He was probably on his 6th pint of wine when he was doing that interview.
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    Rothko said:

    Sterling starts, we lack a passer in the midfield to open up defenses, so you need a tricky player to cause problems otherwise, and Sterling did that well, he also puts in a massive shift. Alli isn't fit, and can't see him backing up in time for Saturday.

    Sweden are a bit of a bogey side in tournaments, can't remember beating them in one, just scrappy draws up being popped open by Thomas Brolin in Stockholm in '92.

    Euro 2012 mate - 3-2
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,318
    edited July 2018
    and 2006 World Cup (2-1); Cole hit a screamer with Owen on the deck screaming as thats when he picked up that nasty injury
  • johnnybev1987
    johnnybev1987 Posts: 11,410
    Sterling needs to be dropped for Rashford, he did get better but Rashford will scare the defenders more. What i dont understand is why we are playing sterling practically up top or in a free role, he doesn't play there for City... Only person who doesn't suit the system imo, would work better as a sub with his pace.
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    edited July 2018

    and 2006 World Cup (2-1); Cole hit a screamer with Owen on the deck screaming as thats when he picked up that nasty injury

    That finished 2-2 Henrik Larsson scored in the 90th min. Don’t tell me you turned off with 2 mins left and have spent the last 12 years thinking we won that game?!?
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    If Sterling were to be dropped, which I don't think he should be, I'd bring in Loftus-Cheek and push Dele up behind Kane. Rashford hasn't done anything Sterling hasn't.
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,801

    Rothko said:

    Sterling starts, we lack a passer in the midfield to open up defenses, so you need a tricky player to cause problems otherwise, and Sterling did that well, he also puts in a massive shift. Alli isn't fit, and can't see him backing up in time for Saturday.

    Sweden are a bit of a bogey side in tournaments, can't remember beating them in one, just scrappy draws up being popped open by Thomas Brolin in Stockholm in '92.

    Euro 2012 mate - 3-2
    Oh yeah, the lump it up to Andy Carroll game
  • johnnybev1987
    johnnybev1987 Posts: 11,410

    If Sterling were to be dropped, which I don't think he should be, I'd bring in Loftus-Cheek and push Dele up behind Kane. Rashford hasn't done anything Sterling hasn't.

    Rashford came on too late last night, i would have made it at half time. Sterling is a good player for city but doesn't play the same way or position for England.
  • Sponsored links:



  • SantaClaus
    SantaClaus Posts: 7,652

    I have zero time for Allardyce's try not to lose mentality.

  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,912
    I'm supposed to be playing cricket on Saturday.

    Can feel an injury coming on.
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,459
    Rothko said:

    Could you imagine if Fat Sam was in charge for this World cup. he probably would have recalled John Terry, to play alongside Gary Cahill, and Rooney would be starting still.

    Can see it now.

    ' It's the Sun wot won it!'
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,318

    and 2006 World Cup (2-1); Cole hit a screamer with Owen on the deck screaming as thats when he picked up that nasty injury

    That finished 2-2 Henrik Larsson scored in the 90th min. Don’t tell me you turned off with 2 mins left and have spent the last 12 years thinking we won that game?!?
    Have to admit, I remember the Joe Cole wonder goal, I remember the equaliser and remember Owen going down injured

    Couldnt have told you that Gerrard scored (or so late), certainly dont remember the second equaliser
  • Covered_End_Lad
    Covered_End_Lad Posts: 5,725
    Dele Alli might be the most overrated player in the premier league.
  • JohnBoyUK
    JohnBoyUK Posts: 9,017

    If Sterling were to be dropped, which I don't think he should be, I'd bring in Loftus-Cheek and push Dele up behind Kane. Rashford hasn't done anything Sterling hasn't.

    What? Play Dele Alli in his proper position where he causes the most damage? The position where he links up with Kane so well? Don't talk such nonsense. Sigh.

    I'd do the same.
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,431

    JohnBoyUK said:

    Interesting listening to Sam Allardyce this morning on TalkShite. He suggested going to a straight 4-4-2, as Sweden don't really have an attacking threat with Ibrahimovic now retired and we don't need a 3rd centre-back...and we should drop Trippier.

    Trippier has been one of our better players, if not the best so far in this tournament.

    The Swedes will sit back and play counter-attack. Its up to us to break them down. Can we do that, that is the question?
    This is the time you just wish that England had a midfield playmaker.

    So he would go 442 v a Sweden side who topped a group with Mexico and germany in because they have little attacking threat...
    I don't disagree overall but Sweden have scored as many goals in this tournament as we did against Panama so he does kind of have a point. The problem is that Sweden have also conceded as many goals in this tournament as we did against Panama!

  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,318

    I'm supposed to be playing cricket on Saturday.

    Can feel an injury coming on.

    Just get a hose and flood the pitch overnight
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    JohnBoyUK said:

    If Sterling were to be dropped, which I don't think he should be, I'd bring in Loftus-Cheek and push Dele up behind Kane. Rashford hasn't done anything Sterling hasn't.

    What? Play Dele Alli in his proper position where he causes the most damage? The position where he links up with Kane so well? Don't talk such nonsense. Sigh.

    I'd do the same.
    Realised last night what an intelligent footballer Kane is. Just dropping deeper, playing for little fouls to frustrate Colombia and keep possession. Would like to see us start to create chances from open play for him though, whcih hasn't happened too much yet. Dele further up could do that.
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,619
    The thing about this game is that there should be no fear.

    Sweden are going to be no pushovers certainly. Who would be in a World Cup Quarter Final but man for man ask yourself how many of the Swedes would force there way into the England side.

    Doesn’t mean we can’t lose but we shouldn’t be afraid.