Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

STATBANK: Charlton Athletic 1-0 Brentford F.C.

lancashire lad
lancashire lad Posts: 15,626
edited August 2019 in General Charlton
many thanks to the 89 Lifers who gave marks, I could not find a decent pic of the MoM in CAFC shirt so used a group pic instead. Don't know how much the spotlight on defenders stats mean but it's there in case it might mean something to somebody








Comments

  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 50,974
    edited August 2019
    WHY did you spell the MOM name wrong in statistics of order of players marks? 

    locksjpg

    Is this any good?
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    Love those extra defensive stats, even if I no idea what they really mean!
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,626
    edited August 2019
    ross1 said:
    WHY did you spell the MOM name wrong in statistics of order of players marks? 

    locksjpg

    Is this any good?
    the reason his name is spelt wrong is because I made a mistake, obvious I would have thought, edited to correct spelling
    no don't like that pic, prefer the group shot
  • CafcWest
    CafcWest Posts: 6,167
    Wow 8.47 for a defender!  Second highest score for the season behind Gallagher’s 8.5.  One question @lancashire lad - in the new Defenders table how do players get a decimal point - for instance Purrington offside 0.4!?  Great stats as usual.
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,626
    cafc-west said:
    Wow 8.47 for a defender!  Second highest score for the season behind Gallagher’s 8.5.  One question @lancashire lad - in the new Defenders table how do players get a decimal point - for instance Purrington offside 0.4!?  Great stats as usual.
    sorry I have no idea how they calculate the stats.
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,376
    It says offsides won per game. Presumably that means if a defender makes two appearances and catches a striker offside once over of the two games they’d average 0.5 offsides per game.
  • CafcWest
    CafcWest Posts: 6,167
    Scoham said:
    It says offsides won per game. Presumably that means if a defender makes two appearances and catches a striker offside once over of the two games they’d average 0.5 offsides per game.
    That makes sense.
  • Blackheathen
    Blackheathen Posts: 6,655
    Interesting how many goals are scored late in first half or in the final minutes of game.

    Great job by the way Lancashire Lad.  Really interesting.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    Scoham said:
    It says offsides won per game. Presumably that means if a defender makes two appearances and catches a striker offside once over of the two games they’d average 0.5 offsides per game.
    A bizarre stat really, as surely offsides are just as much an error by the attacking player as something to credit the defence for?

    I assume Pearce leads the table as during the game he missed, no Forest player was caught offside. If however Grabban had strayed offside a couple of times, then the other defenders would have overtaken him   :D
  • johnnybev1987
    johnnybev1987 Posts: 11,411
    Admittedly I didn't go, but when we get a clean sheet but Dillon is still near the bottom of the list, how did that happen?
  • Sponsored links:



  • DoctorCharlton
    DoctorCharlton Posts: 2,463
    Sam Field made no blocks? I swear he was one of the bodies in the way at the end?
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,626
    DoctorCharlton said:
    Sam Field made no blocks? I swear he was one of the bodies in the way at the end?
    I never thought of it that way round! the blocks refer to shots made by our players which are blocked by the opposition, unfortunately the match information I have found available does not include the name of the player that blocks the shot just the one that made it.
  • DoctorCharlton
    DoctorCharlton Posts: 2,463
    lancashire lad said:
    DoctorCharlton said:
    Sam Field made no blocks? I swear he was one of the bodies in the way at the end?
    I never thought of it that way round! the blocks refer to shots made by our players which are blocked by the opposition, unfortunately the match information I have found available does not include the name of the player that blocks the shot just the one that made it.

    Guess that makes sense haha thanks mate
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344

  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    edited August 2019
    Great work as ever
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,229
    Good work Lancs.

    It didn't feel that we had as much as 31% but saw that figure on the BBC stats.

    Must be quite a few games when we have been under the cosh but the one that springs to mind was the evening game at Norwich when we won 1-0 with a daisy cutter from Jackson which I'm sure was our only shot of the night ?
    Remember Henderson doing every thing in slow motion, Wiggins having a superb defensive game(no wing back this night)
    and Norwich having the ball and attacking similar to Brentford.

    The fact that Brentford had 22 shots but only 4 on target which from memory was two blocks from Pearce and Field and two decent saves by Philips.

  • CafcWest
    CafcWest Posts: 6,167
    johnnybev1987 said:
    Admittedly I didn't go, but when we get a clean sheet but Dillon is still near the bottom of the list, how did that happen?
    Well he didn't have a great deal to do as the defenders in front of him did most of the blocking and defending - hence Lockyer and Pearce at the top.
    Dillon made a couple of good saves but also a few dodgy moments...
  • johnnybev1987
    johnnybev1987 Posts: 11,411
    cafc-west said:
    johnnybev1987 said:
    Admittedly I didn't go, but when we get a clean sheet but Dillon is still near the bottom of the list, how did that happen?
    Well he didn't have a great deal to do as the defenders in front of him did most of the blocking and defending - hence Lockyer and Pearce at the top.
    Dillon made a couple of good saves but also a few dodgy moments...

    Thank you, quite mad how he can get a clean sheet and still be the 2nd worst player marked. But as you say if he had a few hairy moments, it makes sense.
  • smudge7946
    smudge7946 Posts: 4,131
    How can that rank as Dillons worst game of the season?
    A clean sheet and game winning saves.
    We never seem to appreciate our keepers.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,318
    smudge7946 said:
    How can that rank as Dillons worst game of the season?
    A clean sheet and game winning saves.
    We never seem to appreciate our keepers.
    All other games his catching and decision making has been top notch

    Granted his distribution is never brilliant but dont care too much about that provided he keeps the ball out the net

    Other games this season he's not really been at fault for the goals

    Just for the majority of Saturday I felt the clean sheet was down to Lockyer and Pearce more than Dillon
  • Sponsored links:



  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,824
    ForeverAddickted said:
    smudge7946 said:
    How can that rank as Dillons worst game of the season?
    A clean sheet and game winning saves.
    We never seem to appreciate our keepers.
    All other games his catching and decision making has been top notch

    Granted his distribution is never brilliant but dont care too much about that provided he keeps the ball out the net

    Other games this season he's not really been at fault for the goals

    Just for the majority of Saturday I felt the clean sheet was down to Lockyer and Pearce more than Dillon
    Agreed. His flapping at crosses didn’t lend itself to a high mark either 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    The Sunday Times interestingly had Williams as MoM with 8, with Lockyer and Pearce only getting 7s


Categories

“Marketplace”