If I’ve got this right, he applied for his visa in November and only satisfied the requirements for the visa by catching covid a month later in December…. convenient
He then attended two public events in the 2 days after he received his positive test result and didn’t have to isolate for the 14 days as required by Serbian law.
If I’ve got this right, he applied for his visa in November and only satisfied the requirements for the visa by catching covid a month later in December…. convenient
He then attended two public events in the 2 days after he received his positive test result and didn’t have to isolate for the 14 days as required by Serbian law.
Who in their right mind believes this idiot
The Serbian government will just lie on his behalf if required and I have no idea what the Australian government is doing.
If he did genuinely test positive and then swanned around infecting people I assume everyone is okay with this?
If I’ve got this right, he applied for his visa in November and only satisfied the requirements for the visa by catching covid a month later in December…. convenient
He then attended two public events in the 2 days after he received his positive test result and didn’t have to isolate for the 14 days as required by Serbian law.
Who in their right mind believes this idiot
That's pretty much seems to be it and the deadline for the exemption was 10 Dec, 6 days before he tested positive (and went to events and to Paris)
If I’ve got this right, he applied for his visa in November and only satisfied the requirements for the visa by catching covid a month later in December…. convenient
He then attended two public events in the 2 days after he received his positive test result and didn’t have to isolate for the 14 days as required by Serbian law.
Who in their right mind believes this idiot
That's pretty much seems to be it and the deadline for the exemption was 10 Dec, 6 days before he tested positive (and went to events and to Paris)
I'm sure someone can give a clear explanation that makes some sort of sense?
If I’ve got this right, he applied for his visa in November and only satisfied the requirements for the visa by catching covid a month later in December…. convenient
He then attended two public events in the 2 days after he received his positive test result and didn’t have to isolate for the 14 days as required by Serbian law.
Who in their right mind believes this idiot
That's pretty much seems to be it and the deadline for the exemption was 10 Dec, 6 days before he tested positive (and went to events and to Paris)
I'm sure someone can give a clear explanation that makes some sort of sense?
I cant see how though. If there is a clear explanation, the give it.
I think they have got their way and don't care. Again
If I’ve got this right, he applied for his visa in November and only satisfied the requirements for the visa by catching covid a month later in December…. convenient
He then attended two public events in the 2 days after he received his positive test result and didn’t have to isolate for the 14 days as required by Serbian law.
Who in their right mind believes this idiot
That's pretty much seems to be it and the deadline for the exemption was 10 Dec, 6 days before he tested positive (and went to events and to Paris)
I'm sure someone can give a clear explanation that makes some sort of sense?
I cant see how though. If there is a clear explanation, the give it.
I think they have got their way and don't care. Again
If Novak's behaviour has been as cavalier as has been suggested then it just shows what an unpleasant individual he is...
My understanding is that the court hearing today only considered the fact that Djokovic had been treated unfairly by the immigration department who didn't allow him the time they granted for him to come up with more evidence. The judge did not look at the chronology or the facts surrounding his claim for an exemption.
It is becoming increasingly clear that such claim for exemption was fabricated and is riddled with inconsistencies, out of chronological sequence, and bare-faced lies. If Morrison has any balls he would overrule the judgement and kick him out. I won't hold my breath though.
If I’ve got this right, he applied for his visa in November and only satisfied the requirements for the visa by catching covid a month later in December…. convenient
He then attended two public events in the 2 days after he received his positive test result and didn’t have to isolate for the 14 days as required by Serbian law.
Who in their right mind believes this idiot
That's pretty much seems to be it and the deadline for the exemption was 10 Dec, 6 days before he tested positive (and went to events and to Paris)
I'm sure someone can give a clear explanation that makes some sort of sense?
The clearest explanation I can give is 1 rule for the rich and famous and 1 rule for everyone else.
If I’ve got this right, he applied for his visa in November and only satisfied the requirements for the visa by catching covid a month later in December…. convenient
He then attended two public events in the 2 days after he received his positive test result and didn’t have to isolate for the 14 days as required by Serbian law.
Who in their right mind believes this idiot
That's pretty much seems to be it and the deadline for the exemption was 10 Dec, 6 days before he tested positive (and went to events and to Paris)
I'm sure someone can give a clear explanation that makes some sort of sense?
The clearest explanation I can give is 1 rule for the rich and famous and 1 rule for everyone else.
Getting back, for a moment, to the reason Novak is in Australia in the first place, tennis, imprisonment is hardly the ideal preparation for an athlete embarking upon a Grand Slam. There must be a point whereby Novak decides to say 'sod your tournament' and return home to Serbia if he considers that he has little or no chance of defending his title through lack of practice.
Getting back, for a moment, to the reason Novak is in Australia in the first place, tennis, imprisonment is hardly the ideal preparation for an athlete embarking upon a Grand Slam. There must be a point whereby Novak decides to say 'sod your tournament' and return home to Serbia Monaco if he considers that he has little or no chance of defending his title through lack of practice.
Getting back, for a moment, to the reason Novak is in Australia in the first place, tennis, imprisonment is hardly the ideal preparation for an athlete embarking upon a Grand Slam. There must be a point whereby Novak decides to say 'sod your tournament' and return home to Serbia if he considers that he has little or no chance of defending his title through lack of practice.
He's back on a court already no doubt in his luxury accommodation with his personal chef. Got what he wanted by hook or by.....
Not sure if they will take any further action, although I really hope so
Getting back, for a moment, to the reason Novak is in Australia in the first place, tennis, imprisonment is hardly the ideal preparation for an athlete embarking upon a Grand Slam. There must be a point whereby Novak decides to say 'sod your tournament' and return home to Serbia if he considers that he has little or no chance of defending his title through lack of practice.
He's back on a court already no doubt in his luxury accommodation with his personal chef. Got what he wanted by hook or by.....
Not sure if they will take any further action, although I really hope so
Getting back, for a moment, to the reason Novak is in Australia in the first place, tennis, imprisonment is hardly the ideal preparation for an athlete embarking upon a Grand Slam. There must be a point whereby Novak decides to say 'sod your tournament' and return home to Serbia if he considers that he has little or no chance of defending his title through lack of practice.
He's back on a court already no doubt in his luxury accommodation with his personal chef. Got what he wanted by hook or by.....
Not sure if they will take any further action, although I really hope so
I thought he had been rearrested.
Erm……he was never arrested in the first place Len.
Getting back, for a moment, to the reason Novak is in Australia in the first place, tennis, imprisonment is hardly the ideal preparation for an athlete embarking upon a Grand Slam. There must be a point whereby Novak decides to say 'sod your tournament' and return home to Serbia if he considers that he has little or no chance of defending his title through lack of practice.
He's already had a training session at the stadium today within hours of being released and the tournament doesn't start for another week.
Admittedly he hasn't had the best few days prep but he still has plenty of time.
Comments
Just caught some of the family press conference on Sky Sports News
Questions asked of the brother -
Can you confirm he tested positive on 16 Dec? Oh yes' he confirmed nodding
Can you confirm he attended an event the very next day? He started ginning and answered 'this press conference is adjourned'
A great sporting role model.
If he did genuinely test positive and then swanned around infecting people I assume everyone is okay with this?
You couldn't make this stuff up.
I think they have got their way and don't care. Again
It is becoming increasingly clear that such claim for exemption was fabricated and is riddled with inconsistencies, out of chronological sequence, and bare-faced lies. If Morrison has any balls he would overrule the judgement and kick him out. I won't hold my breath though.
Not sure if they will take any further action, although I really hope so
Admittedly he hasn't had the best few days prep but he still has plenty of time.
Disappointed, but not surprised