I have turned the cricket on twice this morning (kids are hogging the TV). On both occasions the ball being bowled resulted in a wicket. Leaving the remote well alone now
The partnership between Pope and Buttler is looking even better now.
It was basically all with the old ball though, so a lot easier than facing the new ball with fresh bowlers
Yes. Obviously. But, a partnership of 140 in a score of 280-8 is a significant achievement. Had they not knuckled down, we would have been bowling last night.
StigThundercock: What is Captain Cretin doing catching that with both hands? Can't he understand you need to keep your hands off the ball if you want to preserve the shine?
Last test I was saying how missing no balls could cost a team a match due to the extra runs not being added & then losing by the odd run.
Now its players overstepping, not being called & only checking when a wicket goes down. No idea if Woakes had over stepped previously, but if had, and been called (or at least been warned he was getting close) then he might have pulled it back a bit & Windies would be 7 down. They did say he hasn't bowled a no ball for xxx number of overs......probably has but its just that none took a wicket so they didnt check.
Argh. Does my head in. Seems some laws of the game of cricket don't count anymore.
Broad gets a 5 for.. .....Windies 9 down & 180 behind. Hopefully get a lead of 400 with an hour before close, put them in & get a couple of wickets before stumps
Weather tomorrow looks bad so will need all of the 5th day to get the rest out.
Comments
In the Caribbean it would be a Calypso Collapso. What is it in dreary Manchester...??
WI 242 behind
Last test I was saying how missing no balls could cost a team a match due to the extra runs not being added & then losing by the odd run.
Now its players overstepping, not being called & only checking when a wicket goes down. No idea if Woakes had over stepped previously, but if had, and been called (or at least been warned he was getting close) then he might have pulled it back a bit & Windies would be 7 down. They did say he hasn't bowled a no ball for xxx number of overs......probably has but its just that none took a wicket so they didnt check.
Argh. Does my head in. Seems some laws of the game of cricket don't count anymore.
Weather tomorrow looks bad so will need all of the 5th day to get the rest out.