Summer Transfer Rumours 2020 (DEADLINE DAY from pg.258)

carly burn

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

 With our usual list of crocks, I can personally guarantee this fella will get some games.

MattF

Cafc43v3r said:

MattF said:

cafc4life said:

Why one in one out if we are out of the embargo now?

The wage cap I assume

And limit on squad size of over 21s 

And that, just typical really, got any inkling as to what option we're likely to go with?

Dazzler21

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/charlton-athletic/kader/verein/358

Only a few under age players.

Cafc43v3r

MattF said:

Cafc43v3r said:

MattF said:

cafc4life said:

Why one in one out if we are out of the embargo now?

The wage cap I assume

And limit on squad size of over 21s 

And that, just typical really, got any inkling as to what option we're likely to go with?

None. But if it was me I would take an u21 right back tbh.  Matthews is a very good player but I would rather have the fire power and a solid center half. Ideally we can have all 4.

moutuakilla

Are we still forced to have players in our 23 that are not going to feature but have had 1 appearance or was that just under the embargo? Can we now decide who we count as our 23?

carly burn

What’s the latest with Albie M?

wouldnt mind betting he’ll be sacrificed as Bows doesn’t appear to rate him.

MattF

Cafc43v3r said:

MattF said:

Cafc43v3r said:

MattF said:

cafc4life said:

Why one in one out if we are out of the embargo now?

The wage cap I assume

And limit on squad size of over 21s 

And that, just typical really, got any inkling as to what option we're likely to go with?

None. But if it was me I would take an u21 right back tbh.  Matthews is a very good player but I would rather have the fire power and a solid center half. Ideally we can have all 4.

Suppose we had better hope someone comes up with a good offer for Phillips then

Cafc43v3r

moutuakilla said:

Are we still forced to have players in our 23 that are not going to feature but have had 1 appearance or was that just under the embargo? Can we now decide who we count as our 23?

If they are u21, at what ever the cut off date was someone posted but I can't remember, they don't count for the numbers or the wage cap. 

ShootersHillGuru

With Amos in the building I would now like to see Phillips leave for some decent money obviously. Might free up that space and the cash might make a difference 

cafcfan1990

carly burn said:

What’s the latest with Albie M?

wouldnt mind betting he’ll be sacrificed as Bows doesn’t appear to rate him.

U21 though so pointless as a sacrifice. More likely to be Lapslie surely. 

Todds_right_hook

Can’t bowyer drive Forster caskey to the middle of the woods and leave him there, then use the free space for another forward 

Cafc43v3r

ShootersHillGuru said:

With Amos in the building I would now like to see Phillips leave for some decent money obviously. Might free up that space and the cash might make a difference 

If we sold him for £10 million we couldn't spend it and it would only free up, at the most, about 2.5k a week wages.  Typical for charlton the first time in our history we have an owner that wants to splash some cash and we can't! 

golfaddick

Cafc43v3r said:

moutuakilla said:

Are we still forced to have players in our 23 that are not going to feature but have had 1 appearance or was that just under the embargo? Can we now decide who we count as our 23?

If they are u21, at what ever the cut off date was someone posted but I can't remember, they don't count for the numbers or the wage cap. 

Jan 1st 2020

Leeds_Addick

Cafc43v3r said:

ShootersHillGuru said:

With Amos in the building I would now like to see Phillips leave for some decent money obviously. Might free up that space and the cash might make a difference 

If we sold him for £10 million we couldn't spend it and it would only free up, at the most, about 2.5k a week wages.  Typical for charlton the first time in our history we have an owner that wants to splash some cash and we can't! 

Would be less than £2.5k as well. Would be the league average which I think is about £1.7k

Jackosleftboot

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers

MattF

Jackosleftboot said:

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers

They're only the perms we want, might be a LB we're looking to bring in on loan (although they'd be competing with Purrington for game time)

Cafc43v3r

Jackosleftboot said:

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers

We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 

Shrew

Cafc43v3r said:

Jackosleftboot said:

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers

We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 

Everyone seems pretty happy with Purrington, While he is ok I would rather see a left back who is more decisive and positive going forwards.

wmcf123

Cafc43v3r said:

Jackosleftboot said:

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers

We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 

I do hope Purrington isn’t the left back of choice when the window ends 

Cafc43v3r

wmcf123 said:

Cafc43v3r said:

Jackosleftboot said:

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers

We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 

I do hope Purrington isn’t the left back of choice when the window ends 

You can't replace the whole team... 

I would rather have Purrington than the no one that is the current rcb and rb. 

moutuakilla

Who currently counts as one of the 23 then?

golfaddick

Jackosleftboot said:

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers

Sell Bonne & free up a wage to be used elsewhere.

killerandflash

Dazzler21 said:

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/charlton-athletic/kader/verein/358

Only a few under age players.

That's only 15 over 21s (the cutoff being the age on January 1st) not including Matthews with 22 the limit, so that's 7 more we can bring in, so I don't see the problem

Redrobo

Shrew said:

Cafc43v3r said:

Jackosleftboot said:

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers

We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 

Everyone seems pretty happy with Purrington, While he is ok I would rather see an left back who is more decisive and positive going forwards.

I think Doughty should being left back.

killerandflash

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

Seeing that we need at least 1 RB if not 2, puzzled at that logic. If we faff around and end up playing Barker at RB against Sunderland, it won't be pretty

Similarly we need at least 1 CB in, and already have one loan player there

Fanny Fanackapan

meldrew66 said:

Please can we have a striker who scores goals? If Judas had been up front on Sunday we would have won 4-2. We need another non-Judas Judas.

Sadly, we didn't have enough pieces of silver.....

Sage

killerandflash said:

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

Seeing that we need at least 1 RB if not 2, puzzled at that logic. If we faff around and end up playing Barker at RB against Sunderland, it won't be pretty

Similarly we need at least 1 CB in, and already have one loan player there

Completely agree. Barker has been excellent for us, but we need to bring in someone who can properly play right back otherwise they will target our right side all game and have a lot of joy.

I am sure we will see a few players coming through the door over the next couple of days. 

CAFCsayer

Redrobo said:

Shrew said:

Cafc43v3r said:

Jackosleftboot said:

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers

We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 

Everyone seems pretty happy with Purrington, While he is ok I would rather see an left back who is more decisive and positive going forwards.

I think Doughty should being left back.

If we get Matthews, yes... He isn't a full back, but with him and Matthews wingbacks I think we look good. 

golfaddick

Cafc43v3r said:

ShootersHillGuru said:

With Amos in the building I would now like to see Phillips leave for some decent money obviously. Might free up that space and the cash might make a difference 

If we sold him for £10 million we couldn't spend it and it would only free up, at the most, about 2.5k a week wages.  Typical for charlton the first time in our history we have an owner that wants to splash some cash and we can't! 

Yeah......thanks Accrington, Burton, Rochdale etc etc for voting for a cap that basically means we can't put a meaningful squad together. 

W*****s.

golfaddick

Cafc43v3r said:

Jackosleftboot said:

Cafc43v3r said:

As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan. 

Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back.  Plus another forward.  After that it will be 1 in, 1 out. 

I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.  

They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm. 

So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers

We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan.  Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one.  He will almost certainly not play with 2.  Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington. 

I really think Oztumer is surplus to requirements. If we are going to be limited on numbers I'd rather bring in a RB & CB & get rid of a midfielder or 2.