Why one in one out if we are out of the embargo now?
The wage cap I assume
And limit on squad size of over 21s
And that, just typical really, got any inkling as to what option we're likely to go with?
None. But if it was me I would take an u21 right back tbh. Matthews is a very good player but I would rather have the fire power and a solid center half. Ideally we can have all 4.
Are we still forced to have players in our 23 that are not going to feature but have had 1 appearance or was that just under the embargo? Can we now decide who we count as our 23?
Why one in one out if we are out of the embargo now?
The wage cap I assume
And limit on squad size of over 21s
And that, just typical really, got any inkling as to what option we're likely to go with?
None. But if it was me I would take an u21 right back tbh. Matthews is a very good player but I would rather have the fire power and a solid center half. Ideally we can have all 4.
Suppose we had better hope someone comes up with a good offer for Phillips then
Are we still forced to have players in our 23 that are not going to feature but have had 1 appearance or was that just under the embargo? Can we now decide who we count as our 23?
If they are u21, at what ever the cut off date was someone posted but I can't remember, they don't count for the numbers or the wage cap.
With Amos in the building I would now like to see Phillips leave for some decent money obviously. Might free up that space and the cash might make a difference
With Amos in the building I would now like to see Phillips leave for some decent money obviously. Might free up that space and the cash might make a difference
If we sold him for £10 million we couldn't spend it and it would only free up, at the most, about 2.5k a week wages. Typical for charlton the first time in our history we have an owner that wants to splash some cash and we can't!
Are we still forced to have players in our 23 that are not going to feature but have had 1 appearance or was that just under the embargo? Can we now decide who we count as our 23?
If they are u21, at what ever the cut off date was someone posted but I can't remember, they don't count for the numbers or the wage cap.
With Amos in the building I would now like to see Phillips leave for some decent money obviously. Might free up that space and the cash might make a difference
If we sold him for £10 million we couldn't spend it and it would only free up, at the most, about 2.5k a week wages. Typical for charlton the first time in our history we have an owner that wants to splash some cash and we can't!
Would be less than £2.5k as well. Would be the league average which I think is about £1.7k
As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan.
Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back. Plus another forward. After that it will be 1 in, 1 out.
I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.
They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm.
So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan.
Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back. Plus another forward. After that it will be 1 in, 1 out.
I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.
They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm.
So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
They're only the perms we want, might be a LB we're looking to bring in on loan (although they'd be competing with Purrington for game time)
As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan.
Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back. Plus another forward. After that it will be 1 in, 1 out.
I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.
They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm.
So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan. Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one. He will almost certainly not play with 2. Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington.
As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan.
Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back. Plus another forward. After that it will be 1 in, 1 out.
I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.
They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm.
So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan. Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one. He will almost certainly not play with 2. Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington.
Everyone seems pretty happy with Purrington, While he is ok I would rather see a left back who is more decisive and positive going forwards.
As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan.
Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back. Plus another forward. After that it will be 1 in, 1 out.
I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.
They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm.
So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan. Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one. He will almost certainly not play with 2. Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington.
I do hope Purrington isn’t the left back of choice when the window ends
As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan.
Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back. Plus another forward. After that it will be 1 in, 1 out.
I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.
They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm.
So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan. Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one. He will almost certainly not play with 2. Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington.
I do hope Purrington isn’t the left back of choice when the window ends
You can't replace the whole team...
I would rather have Purrington than the no one that is the current rcb and rb.
As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan.
Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back. Plus another forward. After that it will be 1 in, 1 out.
I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.
They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm.
So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
That's only 15 over 21s (the cutoff being the age on January 1st) not including Matthews with 22 the limit, so that's 7 more we can bring in, so I don't see the problem
As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan.
Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back. Plus another forward. After that it will be 1 in, 1 out.
I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.
They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm.
So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan. Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one. He will almost certainly not play with 2. Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington.
Everyone seems pretty happy with Purrington, While he is ok I would rather see an left back who is more decisive and positive going forwards.
As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan.
Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back. Plus another forward. After that it will be 1 in, 1 out.
I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.
They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm.
Seeing that we need at least 1 RB if not 2, puzzled at that logic. If we faff around and end up playing Barker at RB against Sunderland, it won't be pretty
Similarly we need at least 1 CB in, and already have one loan player there
As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan.
Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back. Plus another forward. After that it will be 1 in, 1 out.
I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.
They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm.
Seeing that we need at least 1 RB if not 2, puzzled at that logic. If we faff around and end up playing Barker at RB against Sunderland, it won't be pretty
Similarly we need at least 1 CB in, and already have one loan player there
Completely agree. Barker has been excellent for us, but we need to bring in someone who can properly play right back otherwise they will target our right side all game and have a lot of joy.
I am sure we will see a few players coming through the door over the next couple of days.
As I understand the delay on Matthews and one other is its a balancing act between 3 perms and 1 loan.
Bowyer wants a first choice striker, center back and right back. Plus another forward. After that it will be 1 in, 1 out.
I think the problem is the second striker as they want an u21 loan but can't guarantee game time.
They want the Danish striker, Matthews and my center half but may look at replacing one of them with a loan to bring in the extra forward on a perm.
So that would leave us with five strikers which seems excessive, when you consider we would have only one left back, purrington who i dont rate and is injury prone, no right winger and no attacking midfielder who is likely to chip in with many goals. I have no issue with bringing in defenders but not sure we need five strikers
We wouldn't, Davidson would go out on loan. Bowyer has only played with a winger because he has got one. He will almost certainly not play with 2. Williams, Oztumer and Chucks are his tens. JFC and the lad from Norwich would be the cover for Purrington.
Everyone seems pretty happy with Purrington, While he is ok I would rather see an left back who is more decisive and positive going forwards.
I think Doughty should being left back.
If we get Matthews, yes... He isn't a full back, but with him and Matthews wingbacks I think we look good.
With Amos in the building I would now like to see Phillips leave for some decent money obviously. Might free up that space and the cash might make a difference
If we sold him for £10 million we couldn't spend it and it would only free up, at the most, about 2.5k a week wages. Typical for charlton the first time in our history we have an owner that wants to splash some cash and we can't!
Yeah......thanks Accrington, Burton, Rochdale etc etc for voting for a cap that basically means we can't put a meaningful squad together.
Comments
Only a few under age players.
wouldnt mind betting he’ll be sacrificed as Bows doesn’t appear to rate him.
I would rather have Purrington than the no one that is the current rcb and rb.
Similarly we need at least 1 CB in, and already have one loan player there
I am sure we will see a few players coming through the door over the next couple of days.
W*****s.