Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Sarr to Coventry ?
Comments
-
Redhenry said:Dazzler21 said:Lincsaddick said:new contract ? .. not for me .. he's unreliable and flaky under pressure .. money will be tight, I believe he's on a good earner .. if so, the money would be better spent, on a proven striker for instance0
-
cafcfan1990 said:colthe3rd said:Leuth said:ChiAddick said:IanJRO said:ChiAddick said:Sarr is good enough for L1. Not sure about the championship.
For the record I'm not anti Sarr. He has blinders but also has some shockers. On the left side of 3 CBs he is comfortable but when he was partnered Lockyer in a 2 instead of Pearce he was exposed.
Yes his distribution is good at times but he has no pace at all, isn't great in the air and gets bullied. Not sure any of that can be argued with.), how many cast-iron shockers (as opposed to getting beaten by a good ball across, like last week) that have led to goals can you think of?
I don't think he was exposed at all when partnered by Lockyer, that Millwall game aside. There was a game against Preston where he was subbed off because he did some ill-advised ball-juggling and had to take a yellow, but it was Pearce and his grubby hands that actually lost us that one
He works best in a 4 man defence mind.0 -
Amazing as it sounds - Nabbs would go to a Prem club.0
-
Dazzler21 said:cafcfan1990 said:colthe3rd said:Leuth said:ChiAddick said:IanJRO said:ChiAddick said:Sarr is good enough for L1. Not sure about the championship.
For the record I'm not anti Sarr. He has blinders but also has some shockers. On the left side of 3 CBs he is comfortable but when he was partnered Lockyer in a 2 instead of Pearce he was exposed.
Yes his distribution is good at times but he has no pace at all, isn't great in the air and gets bullied. Not sure any of that can be argued with.), how many cast-iron shockers (as opposed to getting beaten by a good ball across, like last week) that have led to goals can you think of?
I don't think he was exposed at all when partnered by Lockyer, that Millwall game aside. There was a game against Preston where he was subbed off because he did some ill-advised ball-juggling and had to take a yellow, but it was Pearce and his grubby hands that actually lost us that one
He works best in a 4 man defence mind.1 -
I love watching Naby play. He can be inconsistent, but it's worth it for those moments of beauty where he scores a last minute winner or a beautiful cross field ball
3 -
Gonna get the winner tonight, and leave on a high note!0
-
jacob_CAFC said:I love watching Naby play. He can be inconsistent, but it's worth it for those moments of beauty where he scores a last minute winner or a beautiful cross field ball4
-
Dazzler21 said:cafcfan1990 said:colthe3rd said:Leuth said:ChiAddick said:IanJRO said:ChiAddick said:Sarr is good enough for L1. Not sure about the championship.
For the record I'm not anti Sarr. He has blinders but also has some shockers. On the left side of 3 CBs he is comfortable but when he was partnered Lockyer in a 2 instead of Pearce he was exposed.
Yes his distribution is good at times but he has no pace at all, isn't great in the air and gets bullied. Not sure any of that can be argued with.), how many cast-iron shockers (as opposed to getting beaten by a good ball across, like last week) that have led to goals can you think of?
I don't think he was exposed at all when partnered by Lockyer, that Millwall game aside. There was a game against Preston where he was subbed off because he did some ill-advised ball-juggling and had to take a yellow, but it was Pearce and his grubby hands that actually lost us that one
He works best in a 4 man defence mind.
In a back 4, he has to be purely defensive minded, at which he isn't as good as Pearce
0 -
colthe3rd said:jacob_CAFC said:I love watching Naby play. He can be inconsistent, but it's worth it for those moments of beauty where he scores a last minute winner or a beautiful cross field ball0
-
killerandflash said:Dazzler21 said:cafcfan1990 said:colthe3rd said:Leuth said:ChiAddick said:IanJRO said:ChiAddick said:Sarr is good enough for L1. Not sure about the championship.
For the record I'm not anti Sarr. He has blinders but also has some shockers. On the left side of 3 CBs he is comfortable but when he was partnered Lockyer in a 2 instead of Pearce he was exposed.
Yes his distribution is good at times but he has no pace at all, isn't great in the air and gets bullied. Not sure any of that can be argued with.), how many cast-iron shockers (as opposed to getting beaten by a good ball across, like last week) that have led to goals can you think of?
I don't think he was exposed at all when partnered by Lockyer, that Millwall game aside. There was a game against Preston where he was subbed off because he did some ill-advised ball-juggling and had to take a yellow, but it was Pearce and his grubby hands that actually lost us that one
He works best in a 4 man defence mind.
In a back 4, he has to be purely defensive minded, at which he isn't as good as Pearce0 - Sponsored links:
-
Naby has joined that group of Charlton players, who are never going to be World beaters, are wholehearted in every performance, will make a few clangers every season and are intensely disliked by about 10% of the fan base.
Naby has become a cult hero to join the likes of Carlo, Keith Jones and Kishishev8 -
cafcfan1990 said:colthe3rd said:jacob_CAFC said:I love watching Naby play. He can be inconsistent, but it's worth it for those moments of beauty where he scores a last minute winner or a beautiful cross field ball
1 -
Has anybody done a ‘ if he does I won’t be talking to him ‘ joke?0