Sandgaard on Talksport today - 17/11/20

clive

Thomas will be speaking to Jim White before 13.00 [very shortly],it maybe a pre-recorded interview.

clive

On now

Atletico Addick

https://talksport.com/radioplayer/live/

charlton_hero

Farnell still involved then...

felix_31

Jim White is a joke

roseandcrown

Simon Jordan was spot on again and can see through it all.  

Jim White is just trying to make a massive drama out of the information he is being feed. 

How is Farnell still anywhere near football. 

Stig

Once again, well said Simon Jordan.

felix_31

felix_31 said:

Jim White is a joke

Jordan, however, talks so much sense and knows exactly what Elliotttt is up to

ValleyGary

Actually think White is now at the stage where he’s just being a WUM. I really hope TS stops talking to him.

ElliotCAFC

In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.

SoundAsa£

roseandcrown said:

Simon Jordan was spot on again and can see through it all.  

Jim White is just trying to make a massive drama out of the information he is being feed. 

How is Farnell still anywhere near football. 

If Thomas gets his wish and from what he was saying, it won’t be too long before he sets about changing the criteria and suitability necessary to be an owner or even a financial backer. Farnell and his ilk are set to be black balled from the world of football, might take a while for all the pieces to fall into place but Thomas seems set on getting the ball rolling at some point soon.

stoneroses19

ElliotCAFC said:

In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.

I wasn’t able to listen. Who has this claim you mention come from? Elliott?

Dazzler21

Looking forward to Clive posting the time stamped link!

se9addick

ElliotCAFC said:

In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.

Is it libellous or inaccurate ? 

We’ve had fairly big windfalls from the Bonne sale + the Grant sell on and the salary cap reduces the ability to spend so it might be that Sandgaard hasn’t actually needed to invest funds yet. No issues with that from my perspective.

ElliotCAFC

se9addick said:

ElliotCAFC said:

In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.

Is it libellous or inaccurate ? 

We’ve had fairly big windfalls from the Bonne sale + the Grant sell on and the salary cap reduces the ability to spend so it might be that Sandgaard hasn’t actually needed to invest funds yet. No issues with that from my perspective.

I’d say libellous, unless TS is lying about us being days away from administration before the deal was done, he must have pumped some money in. 

He also had money in escrow before the takeover was completed, so it’s a pretty safe bet that at least £1 of this has been used for general maintenance/ those new lawnmowers he’s purchased. Not to mention shipping costs of the Zynex medical devices

Yes we’ve had income from player sales but it’s not even a half truth to assert that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is relying on the clubs cash. 

ForeverAddickted

charlton_hero said:

Farnell still involved then...

How so? - I didnt get to listen

se9addick

ElliotCAFC said:

se9addick said:

ElliotCAFC said:

In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.

Is it libellous or inaccurate ? 

We’ve had fairly big windfalls from the Bonne sale + the Grant sell on and the salary cap reduces the ability to spend so it might be that Sandgaard hasn’t actually needed to invest funds yet. No issues with that from my perspective.

I’d say libellous, unless TS is lying about us being days away from administration before the deal was done, he must have pumped some money in. 

He also had money in escrow before the takeover was completed, so it’s a pretty safe bet that at least £1 of this has been used for general maintenance/ those new lawnmowers he’s purchased. Not to mention shipping costs of the Zynex medical devices

Yes we’ve had income from player sales but it’s not even a half truth to assert that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is relying on the clubs cash. 

Right but I don’t think that relying on the clubs cash is a negative thing. A club living off of its own means is a sustainable model, that’s exactly what I want.

What is nonsense is for any of the parties who have recently been involved to try and suggest that they would have had a better operating model for us, they wouldn’t. 

No.1 in South London

it's not important if Sandgaard has needed to put money in or not................ the point is that he HAS the money to put in to fund the ambitions he has for the club and has proved that to the EFL................... Farnell and Elliott on the other hand are comparatively potless

MuttleyCAFC

Before Thomas took over, we couldn't bring in anybody and things were creaking. It can be argued we now have the strongest squad in the League.

Dazzler21

ElliotCAFC said:

se9addick said:

ElliotCAFC said:

In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.

Is it libellous or inaccurate ? 

We’ve had fairly big windfalls from the Bonne sale + the Grant sell on and the salary cap reduces the ability to spend so it might be that Sandgaard hasn’t actually needed to invest funds yet. No issues with that from my perspective.

I’d say libellous, unless TS is lying about us being days away from administration before the deal was done, he must have pumped some money in. 

He also had money in escrow before the takeover was completed, so it’s a pretty safe bet that at least £1 of this has been used for general maintenance/ those new lawnmowers he’s purchased. Not to mention shipping costs of the Zynex medical devices

Yes we’ve had income from player sales but it’s not even a half truth to assert that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is relying on the clubs cash. 

Exactly he may have re-couped cash but he spent first... 

Valley27000

Thomas well said.

DagenhamAddick

Di Jim White ask Thomas that he is 100% certain that there is no legal route that Mr Elliott can embark on now in order to take control of CAFC? That in a nutshell is the only thing I'm interested in?

Weegie Addick

Of course Sandgaard is having to put money in - the club will be heading for multi-million £ losses this season.

mendonca

The tone of the interview(er) doesn't seem to have impressed you all that listened?

ForeverAddickted

DagenhamAddick said:

Di Jim White ask Thomas that he is 100% certain that there is no legal route that Mr Elliott can embark on now in order to take control of CAFC? That in a nutshell is the only thing I'm interested in?

Sounds too complicated a question for Jim to ask

cafc999

ElliotCAFC said:

In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.

But that was the exact plan, allegedly, that CF & PE were going to do.

MattF

ForeverAddickted said:

charlton_hero said:

Farnell still involved then...

How so? - I didnt get to listen

Sandgaard named Farnell as being part of what's currently going on

ElliotCAFC

se9addick said:

ElliotCAFC said:

se9addick said:

ElliotCAFC said:

In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.

Is it libellous or inaccurate ? 

We’ve had fairly big windfalls from the Bonne sale + the Grant sell on and the salary cap reduces the ability to spend so it might be that Sandgaard hasn’t actually needed to invest funds yet. No issues with that from my perspective.

I’d say libellous, unless TS is lying about us being days away from administration before the deal was done, he must have pumped some money in. 

He also had money in escrow before the takeover was completed, so it’s a pretty safe bet that at least £1 of this has been used for general maintenance/ those new lawnmowers he’s purchased. Not to mention shipping costs of the Zynex medical devices

Yes we’ve had income from player sales but it’s not even a half truth to assert that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is relying on the clubs cash. 

Right but I don’t think that relying on the clubs cash is a negative thing. A club living off of its own means is a sustainable model, that’s exactly what I want.

What is nonsense is for any of the parties who have recently been involved to try and suggest that they would have had a better operating model for us, they wouldn’t. 

Definitely not a negative thing, it’s a sustainable business model and I’m all for it - it’s just not exactly true.  

The libel comes in because Farnell is using the biggest sports station around to spin that Thomas Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is using player sales to keep the club afloat. That’s defamation of character and could impact the club’s or Sandgaard’s future business.

Dazzler21

Call in the Danish Mafia. 

sunbury-addick

The way I took it, White made a ricket when he said TS had put no money in, I assume he meant Elliott.

Kap10

Dazzler21 said:

ElliotCAFC said:

se9addick said:

ElliotCAFC said:

In a world full of Jim White’s, thank god for Simon Jordan. 

Very interested in the libellous claim that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is funding the club with player sales. We’ll see if there’s a lawsuit for that.

Is it libellous or inaccurate ? 

We’ve had fairly big windfalls from the Bonne sale + the Grant sell on and the salary cap reduces the ability to spend so it might be that Sandgaard hasn’t actually needed to invest funds yet. No issues with that from my perspective.

I’d say libellous, unless TS is lying about us being days away from administration before the deal was done, he must have pumped some money in. 

He also had money in escrow before the takeover was completed, so it’s a pretty safe bet that at least £1 of this has been used for general maintenance/ those new lawnmowers he’s purchased. Not to mention shipping costs of the Zynex medical devices

Yes we’ve had income from player sales but it’s not even a half truth to assert that Sandgaard hasn’t put any money in and is relying on the clubs cash. 

Exactly he may have re-couped cash but he spent first... 

We also know that he was prepared to splash out on a striker, but we were turned down.

Elliot and Farnell seeking a cut from the Grant and Bonne money.

Good on TS if he has brought stability without investing anything .. gives potential funds for January or if we get promoted establishing ourselves in with a decent squad in the Chsmpionship.