Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton Athletic boss Lee Bowyer makes League One sale claim

2»

Comments

  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 51,153
    No money for us, but it seems Liverpool are after Konsa, so could be Konsa and Gomez central defence if Virgil van Dijk is injured
  • Taxi_Lad
    Taxi_Lad Posts: 3,803
    Don’t they know the window slammed shut weeks ago 
  • ross1 said:
    No money for us, but it seems Liverpool are after Konsa, so could be Konsa and Gomez central defence if Virgil van Dijk is injured
    Is it definite there'd be no money for us?  If Brentford have a sell-on clause with Villa, wouldn't we get part of that?
  • ross1 said:
    No money for us, but it seems Liverpool are after Konsa, so could be Konsa and Gomez central defence if Virgil van Dijk is injured
    Is it definite there'd be no money for us?  If Brentford have a sell-on clause with Villa, wouldn't we get part of that?
    Why would we get a sell on when a transfer happened that didnt involve us? - Unfortunately because of FFP, when we sold Konsa there were no addons included, we just bit their hand off for the fee up front
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    ross1 said:
    No money for us, but it seems Liverpool are after Konsa, so could be Konsa and Gomez central defence if Virgil van Dijk is injured
    Is it definite there'd be no money for us?  If Brentford have a sell-on clause with Villa, wouldn't we get part of that?
    Why would we get a sell on when a transfer happened that didnt involve us? - Unfortunately because of FFP, when we sold Konsa there were no addons included, we just bit their hand off for the fee up front
    Because if the sell on is a % of the profit and then another sell on increases that profit you would be entitled to it?

    Anyway as you say its not relevant with Konsa. 
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,562
    Who negotiated the sale of Konsa?

    Of course we get nothing from sell ons. 
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,822
    Not specifically about Konsa, but say a club sells a player with agreed add ons including the sale of that player by the new club. Surely the add ons have a value if the new club sells the player on, if that deal includes add ons, as it is part of the fee. 

    So if the current club, say Villa give Brentford say £3m after selling him to say Liverpool. Is this not considered part of the original fee to Villa? If not, there is a lot of scope for abuse.
  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,790
    Not specifically about Konsa, but say a club sells a player with agreed add ons including the sale of that player by the new club. Surely the add ons have a value if the new club sells the player on, if that deal includes add ons, as it is part of the fee. 

    So if the current club, say Villa give Brentford say £3m after selling him to say Liverpool. Is this not considered part of the original fee to Villa? If not, there is a lot of scope for abuse.
    It is usual for sell ons of sell ons to pay out.
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Not specifically about Konsa, but say a club sells a player with agreed add ons including the sale of that player by the new club. Surely the add ons have a value if the new club sells the player on, if that deal includes add ons, as it is part of the fee. 

    So if the current club, say Villa give Brentford say £3m after selling him to say Liverpool. Is this not considered part of the original fee to Villa? If not, there is a lot of scope for abuse.
    It is usual for sell ons of sell ons to pay out.
    It is but Konsa, if he goes to Liverpool, would be an example of where it could, as is Fosu.  Maybe Doughty will be another. 

    Most of the players we have historical sold, in modern times, have gone to "big clubs" straight from us.