Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)
Comments
-
Any chance Thomas we can sign the whole Welsh team 2nil.3
-
Dallasaddick1956 said:
Why ?up_the_valley said:
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.addick1956 said:
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps.up_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.0 -
Should change your name to 1963addick1956 said:
Why ?up_the_valley said:
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.addick1956 said:
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps.up_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.1 -
Well spotted mate, I read it & it didn't even registerup_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
1 -
Always sad when you have to explain the jokeHenry Irving said:
Dallasaddick1956 said:
Why ?up_the_valley said:
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.addick1956 said:
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps.up_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.4 -
Oh Dude, stop digging.addick1956 said:
Why ?up_the_valley said:
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.addick1956 said:
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps.up_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.0 -
I like JFK and all the other members of Jamiroquai5
-
Register what?charltonbob said:
Well spotted mate, I read it & it didn't even registerup_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.0 -
If you know you know.up_the_valley said:
Register what?charltonbob said:
Well spotted mate, I read it & it didn't even registerup_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.2 -
Except you didn't comment. You asked a question regarding the validity of someone else's rumour. On the rumour thread.addick1956 said:
My point is that it is at least a rumour based on 3rd hand news. Most rumours of this type are . My comment is entirely in keeping with the title. Have you forgotten the title ?Addickted said:
Remind me of the thread title please.addick1956 said:Isn't this just a rumour based on a friend's friend of JFC or something like that.
Don't drive a convertible along Dealey Plaza.2 - Sponsored links:
-
Wigan have signed Max Power today to follow up the signing of Cousins yesterday… they could be a real problem next season
… and it’s means that ‘spotty kid on Twitter’ that everyone was knocking is at least 25% right so far 👍🏼2 -
Joe Morrell having an outstanding euros so far. Won Lincoln’s player of the season in 2019/20 and is very much a Josh Cullen type of player.He can’t get a kick for Luton and Pompey are looking to take him - exactly the sort of midfielder we missed last season.4
-
Definitely have him over JFK.ElliotCAFC said:Joe Morrell having an outstanding euros so far. Won Lincoln’s player of the season in 2019/20 and is very much a Josh Cullen type of player.He can’t get a kick for Luton and Pompey are looking to take him - exactly the sort of midfielder we missed last season.16 -
Liked him at first but he’s not been the same since that injury in 1963.EricBanterna said:
Definitely have him over JFK.ElliotCAFC said:Joe Morrell having an outstanding euros so far. Won Lincoln’s player of the season in 2019/20 and is very much a Josh Cullen type of player.He can’t get a kick for Luton and Pompey are looking to take him - exactly the sort of midfielder we missed last season.39 -
Head’s gone.Laddick01 said:
Liked him at first but he’s not been the same since that injury in 1963.EricBanterna said:
Definitely have him over JFK.ElliotCAFC said:Joe Morrell having an outstanding euros so far. Won Lincoln’s player of the season in 2019/20 and is very much a Josh Cullen type of player.He can’t get a kick for Luton and Pompey are looking to take him - exactly the sort of midfielder we missed last season.37 -
Couldn't he borrow Cech's skullcap?Uboat said:
Head’s gone.Laddick01 said:
Liked him at first but he’s not been the same since that injury in 1963.EricBanterna said:
Definitely have him over JFK.ElliotCAFC said:Joe Morrell having an outstanding euros so far. Won Lincoln’s player of the season in 2019/20 and is very much a Josh Cullen type of player.He can’t get a kick for Luton and Pompey are looking to take him - exactly the sort of midfielder we missed last season.0 -
Jfc had a great season for us last year and we should do the right thing by him but that’s it as far as I’m concerned - hopefully he gets a better offer as I don’t see him as any more than a squad filler at Charlton going forwards3
-
Oh please. Someone help. What have I started? 🙄addick1956 said:
Why ? And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.Cafc43v3r said:
Should change your name to 1963addick1956 said:
Why ?up_the_valley said:
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.addick1956 said:
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps.up_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.7 -
Hey, mate ........ just read what you yourself wrote a few posts back. You could have dodged that bullet.addick1956 said:
Why ? And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.Cafc43v3r said:
Should change your name to 1963addick1956 said:
Why ?up_the_valley said:
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.addick1956 said:
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps.up_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
11 -
- Sponsored links:
-
JFK could be the magic bullet.addick1956 said:
Why ? And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.Cafc43v3r said:
Should change your name to 1963addick1956 said:
Why ?up_the_valley said:
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.addick1956 said:
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps.up_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
What has Warren got to say about it?0 -
I don’t rate him at all and neither did the Sunderland fans the last two seasons .Maccn05 said:Wigan have signed Max Power today to follow up the signing of Cousins yesterday… they could be a real problem next season
… and it’s means that ‘spotty kid on Twitter’ that everyone was knocking is at least 25% right so far 👍🏼2 -
Maybe we should ask LHOAddickted said:
JFK could be the magic bullet.addick1956 said:
Why ? And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.Cafc43v3r said:
Should change your name to 1963addick1956 said:
Why ?up_the_valley said:
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.addick1956 said:
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps.up_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
What has Warren got to say about it?0 -
His shooting is so accurate.up_the_valley said:
Maybe we should ask LHOAddickted said:
JFK could be the magic bullet.addick1956 said:
Why ? And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.Cafc43v3r said:
Should change your name to 1963addick1956 said:
Why ?up_the_valley said:
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.addick1956 said:
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps.up_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.
What has Warren got to say about it?
2 -
I agree the 1st injury is grassy knoll and void as far as I am concerned.addick1956 said:
Why ? And I don't think one can say that the previous injury cancels this one. They are two different events.Cafc43v3r said:
Should change your name to 1963addick1956 said:
Why ?up_the_valley said:
Don't think Charlton can offer anything to help JFK.addick1956 said:
Can't see how you can call that a sensible comment. More that of a child perhaps.up_the_valley said:
😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣addick1956 said:
I think a good club would have a duty of care and JFK owes a bit from his last long injury to agree a deal. My opinion.Redrobo said:
Well there could be a winner. If he does not sign a new contract we don’t have to pay his medical expenses or his wages. It is not unreasonable for us to want a return from our investment in either a fee or performance.Cafc43v3r said:
Works both ways though doesn't it, we didn't offer him a contract during the season so what do you expect him to do?Athletico Charlton said:If it is true I would pull the contract offer. Assuming he was going to run his contract down and leave for nothing at its end to go to the Championship then we owe him little having paid his salary through years of injuries. He then expects we give him a year to get fit with that risk on us and him leaving at the end. Don't think so.
May all be bolloxs though of course.
He, and his agent, will be full aware of any championship interest there was before his injury and the value of it in pounds, shillings and pence. There would also probably be interest from the other "big clubs" in league 1. If that interest would result in a concrete offer, however, is a totally different kettle of fish.
It's the risk you run by having so many players in the last year of their contract especially so many that are actually playing. I think 6 of the 8 were playing almost every game?
Now we are left with a position that neither party is going to be fully happy with. If he hadn't got injured he would have got a payrise here, or else where and probably a 3 year contract. Rightly we won't give him one because he is injured. There are no winners now, what ever the outcome.
We are doing absolutely the right thing by offering him a contract. Totally his choice now.
Employers do have a duty of care to employees and good employers know this.0 -
They named him after an airport?up_the_valley said:6 -
Yes, but he's a leaderLaddick01 said:
Liked him at first but he’s not been the same since that injury in 1963.EricBanterna said:
Definitely have him over JFK.ElliotCAFC said:Joe Morrell having an outstanding euros so far. Won Lincoln’s player of the season in 2019/20 and is very much a Josh Cullen type of player.He can’t get a kick for Luton and Pompey are looking to take him - exactly the sort of midfielder we missed last season.0 -
Cousins and Power …..blimey can you imagine reaction if we brought them !!!!!Bedsaddick said:
I don’t rate him at all and neither did the Sunderland fans the last two seasons .Maccn05 said:Wigan have signed Max Power today to follow up the signing of Cousins yesterday… they could be a real problem next season
… and it’s means that ‘spotty kid on Twitter’ that everyone was knocking is at least 25% right so far 👍🏼
Would not worry to much about Wigan if this is the level of player there getting4 -
Anyone else remember the Lone Gunman articles in the Voice?1
This discussion has been closed.
