Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)

1686687689691692867

Comments

  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,489
    What is this obsession with @RonnieMoore and banning him? The guy insults no one and just posts rumours on a thread about ....wait for it....rumours.
    I've never met him but he's a known Charlton fan, and given his loyalty to the club  I can easily imagine him applauding the players off the pitch after tuesdays loss. Is that bad?
    If you find his stuff irritating, and many seem to, don't read it. It's not a problem as his name is on top of all his posts.
    They’re groundless rumours….he just makes them up, the  man is an outrageous fantasist.
    Complete waste of space.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,700
    Renewing Pearce and Watson looks like an even dumber move in hindsight thanks to this squad cap. 

    Willingly having poor players in the side that Adkins himself admitted weren't good enough.  
    Especially when NA is on record as saying last season we had the oldest squad in League one and something along the lines of we are going to freshen things up and bring down the average age.
    Am I missing something here - I am sure I read that both Watson and Pearce were said to have triggered contract extensions unilaterally. Nothing near to the club offereing them new contracts, but smply being obliged to either keep them or pay off the contracts thus spending money on two players who would then be unavailable to play. 
    I think it was Watson and Gunter who triggered contract extension.
    Pearce was offered a one year deal.
  • esseffect
    esseffect Posts: 493
    What is this obsession with @RonnieMoore and banning him? The guy insults no one and just posts rumours on a thread about ....wait for it....rumours.
    I've never met him but he's a known Charlton fan, and given his loyalty to the club  I can easily imagine him applauding the players off the pitch after tuesdays loss. Is that bad?
    If you find his stuff irritating, and many seem to, don't read it. It's not a problem as his name is on top of all his posts.
    Totally agree. The people who outright attack him I’d rather see the back of
  • SuedeAdidas
    SuedeAdidas Posts: 7,751
    edited August 2021
    I thought it was fairly clear from NA's comments that the Pearce contract was as much to do with nurturing / mentoring the younger players as much as it was to do with being a back up CB.

    You can't just reduce the age of a squad by kicking out every player over xx age. Younger players coming through need to see some older, more experienced players along side them on the pitch....not just words from experienced coaches in training IMO.

    Pearce is also in the process of getting his coaching badges etc so I think that the extension was a fairly decent decision for all parties.
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,814
    I thought it was fair clear from NA's comments that the Pearce contract was as much to do with nurturing / mentoring the younger players as much as it was to do with being a back up CB.

    You can't just reduce the age of a squad by kicking out every player over xx age. Younger players coming through need to see some older, more experienced players along side them on the pitch....not just words from experienced coaches in training IMO.

    Pearce is also in the process of getting his coaching badges etc so I think that the extension was a fairly decent decision for all parties.
    Exactly, you can't just drop the age and hope it works, even the 'can't win anything with kids' United team had Schmeichel, Irwin, Bruce, Pallister, Cantona, Keane, Giggs and David May (yeah I know, he won a Champions League medal) in that squad and team. You need experienced pros around the kids to help them develop 
  • arny23394
    arny23394 Posts: 1,180
    Rothko said:
    I thought it was fair clear from NA's comments that the Pearce contract was as much to do with nurturing / mentoring the younger players as much as it was to do with being a back up CB.

    You can't just reduce the age of a squad by kicking out every player over xx age. Younger players coming through need to see some older, more experienced players along side them on the pitch....not just words from experienced coaches in training IMO.

    Pearce is also in the process of getting his coaching badges etc so I think that the extension was a fairly decent decision for all parties.
    Exactly, you can't just drop the age and hope it works, even the 'can't win anything with kids' United team had Schmeichel, Irwin, Bruce, Pallister, Cantona, Keane, Giggs and David May (yeah I know, he won a Champions League medal) in that squad and team. You need experienced pros around the kids to help them develop 
    Agree with what you say, but the players you listed were good players despite their age. Watson and to a lesser extent, Pearce, are toilet.
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,814
    arny23394 said:
    Rothko said:
    I thought it was fair clear from NA's comments that the Pearce contract was as much to do with nurturing / mentoring the younger players as much as it was to do with being a back up CB.

    You can't just reduce the age of a squad by kicking out every player over xx age. Younger players coming through need to see some older, more experienced players along side them on the pitch....not just words from experienced coaches in training IMO.

    Pearce is also in the process of getting his coaching badges etc so I think that the extension was a fairly decent decision for all parties.
    Exactly, you can't just drop the age and hope it works, even the 'can't win anything with kids' United team had Schmeichel, Irwin, Bruce, Pallister, Cantona, Keane, Giggs and David May (yeah I know, he won a Champions League medal) in that squad and team. You need experienced pros around the kids to help them develop 
    Agree with what you say, but the players you listed were good players despite their age. Watson and to a lesser extent, Pearce, are toilet.
    Pearce is still a decent enough League 1 player, Watson is probably past it, but they along with Gunter, Washington and Matthews (who are still good players in this division) are needed in this group to give it a bit of experience. Hopefully we add more in the coming weeks 
  • Clarky
    Clarky Posts: 582
    Chunes said:
    We keep getting told that we're after 'good' players and they cost money in addition to being wanted by other clubs so they will be difficult to get over the line.
    I thought TS said we have our first 11 and we are only after players for 'depth' now
    I think he said we are almost there with our first 11. And if he was including Kirk (yet to start) Gilbey and Purrington in that then a couple more who could walk straight into the 11 and a back up RCB and LB and we are getting closer to what he wants.
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,377
    edited August 2021
    Clarky said:
    Chunes said:
    We keep getting told that we're after 'good' players and they cost money in addition to being wanted by other clubs so they will be difficult to get over the line.
    I thought TS said we have our first 11 and we are only after players for 'depth' now
    I think he said we are almost there with our first 11. And if he was including Kirk (yet to start) Gilbey and Purrington in that then a couple more who could walk straight into the 11 and a back up RCB and LB and we are getting closer to what he wants.
    The full quote: 

    “I hope we can make a few more additions. Some of those will probably be more of the last-minute deadline day loan signings – simply just to create a little more depth in the squad. Because it is a long season, 46 games as a minimum.

    “We need a few more players in to strengthen the depth of the squad. We pretty much have the makings of a starting first-team now and a decent depth. By adding up to a handful more players before deadline then we will be well set for this season."

  • Redhenry said:
    Aren't there other threads for all this waffle?
    One mans waffle is another mans pancake....or is that just waffle B)

  • Sponsored links:



  • supaclive
    supaclive Posts: 6,516
    Chunes said:
    Clarky said:
    Chunes said:
    We keep getting told that we're after 'good' players and they cost money in addition to being wanted by other clubs so they will be difficult to get over the line.
    I thought TS said we have our first 11 and we are only after players for 'depth' now
    I think he said we are almost there with our first 11. And if he was including Kirk (yet to start) Gilbey and Purrington in that then a couple more who could walk straight into the 11 and a back up RCB and LB and we are getting closer to what he wants.
    The full quote: “I hope we can make a few more additions,” Sandgaard told Charlton TV in their pre-show before the Oxford United match. “Some of those will probably be more of the last-minute deadline day loan signings – simply just to create a little more depth in the squad. Because it is a long season, 46 games as a minimum.

    “We need a few more players in to strengthen the depth of the squad. We pretty much have the makings of a starting first-team now and a decent depth. By adding up to a handful more players before deadline then we will be well set for this season.

    I get he isn't going to come out and say we are going to smash our budget and sign loads of players but the above is very, very worrying and the longer it goes on, the more closer to the truth I think it actually is.

    We are SO short of quality in the starting 11 and impact subs that MK Dons and Oxford are miles better than us.   I can't see, honestly, nothing better than bottom half with our current squad and who we may sign.

    It is going to be a long, hard winter.
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,991
    Chunes said:
    Clarky said:
    Chunes said:
    We keep getting told that we're after 'good' players and they cost money in addition to being wanted by other clubs so they will be difficult to get over the line.
    I thought TS said we have our first 11 and we are only after players for 'depth' now
    I think he said we are almost there with our first 11. And if he was including Kirk (yet to start) Gilbey and Purrington in that then a couple more who could walk straight into the 11 and a back up RCB and LB and we are getting closer to what he wants.
    The full quote: 

    “I hope we can make a few more additions. Some of those will probably be more of the last-minute deadline day loan signings – simply just to create a little more depth in the squad. Because it is a long season, 46 games as a minimum.

    “We need a few more players in to strengthen the depth of the squad. We pretty much have the makings of a starting first-team now and a decent depth. By adding up to a handful more players before deadline then we will be well set for this season."

    ‘Some of those…’

    Says to me we will make signings, both for the first XI PLUS some to add to the squad depth.

    As mentioned before, I don’t think we need to read deep into every word he says.
  • I think we need to be very careful analysing every word a guy says in an unscripted setting when English isn't his first language. Yes he is fluent and he's lived in the US for donkeys years but even when a person is fluent there is always a degree of uncertainty when it gets down to precise underlying meanings and how what he thinks is the same word might actually be a close equivalent, impacted by an idiomatic phrase, etc.

    In any case, words like: some; several; many; few; most; a number; a handful, are inherently imprecise. They mean different things to different people and at different times might mean different things to the same people. Add in the language crossover and word for word analysis is a minefield.

    Proof in actions not words...
  • supaclive
    supaclive Posts: 6,516
    edited August 2021
    Chunes said:
    Clarky said:
    Chunes said:
    We keep getting told that we're after 'good' players and they cost money in addition to being wanted by other clubs so they will be difficult to get over the line.
    I thought TS said we have our first 11 and we are only after players for 'depth' now
    I think he said we are almost there with our first 11. And if he was including Kirk (yet to start) Gilbey and Purrington in that then a couple more who could walk straight into the 11 and a back up RCB and LB and we are getting closer to what he wants.
    The full quote: 

    “I hope we can make a few more additions. Some of those will probably be more of the last-minute deadline day loan signings – simply just to create a little more depth in the squad. Because it is a long season, 46 games as a minimum.

    “We need a few more players in to strengthen the depth of the squad. We pretty much have the makings of a starting first-team now and a decent depth. By adding up to a handful more players before deadline then we will be well set for this season."

    ‘Some of those…’

    Says to me we will make signings, both for the first XI PLUS some to add to the squad depth.

    As mentioned before, I don’t think we need to read deep into every word he says.
    That's your take, but I'm afraid I prefer (and believe) mine.   Unfortunately.    If we had really wanted to be positive, we'd be much further ahead than we are.   Other sides, who we see as our competitors are ahead and we're already 3 games in and will be 5 or 6 games in before the window closes.

    Over 10% of the season.    And an unsettled side, unbalanced side and new players to learn how to play "the Adkins way"

    If you're serious about getting out of the division, you are ahead of where we are right now and closer to where our MUCH stronger competition are.

    I prey I am wrong, but I just don't see it.    Unless TS wakes up and sees we genuinely are far far worse than we were last season.
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Rothko said:
    I thought it was fair clear from NA's comments that the Pearce contract was as much to do with nurturing / mentoring the younger players as much as it was to do with being a back up CB.

    You can't just reduce the age of a squad by kicking out every player over xx age. Younger players coming through need to see some older, more experienced players along side them on the pitch....not just words from experienced coaches in training IMO.

    Pearce is also in the process of getting his coaching badges etc so I think that the extension was a fairly decent decision for all parties.
    Exactly, you can't just drop the age and hope it works, even the 'can't win anything with kids' United team had Schmeichel, Irwin, Bruce, Pallister, Cantona, Keane, Giggs and David May (yeah I know, he won a Champions League medal) in that squad and team. You need experienced pros around the kids to help them develop 
    To be fair Giggs is only about a year older than the class of 92 and Keane was still young but your point is 100% right. 

    You need both and this year just like most of last year most of our 1st team are either too young or too old.  We don't have that core of 25-30 players with a few outliers. 
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,377
    edited August 2021
    This is like being back at school doing English. 

    I think what the author, Thomas Sandgaard, meant, is that...
  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 22,685
    edited August 2021
    Chunes said:
    This is like being back at school doing English. 

    I think what the author, Thomas Sandgaard, meant, is that...
    GCSE,...General Certificate of Sandgaard Education B)
  • Clarky
    Clarky Posts: 582
    Chunes said:
    Clarky said:
    Chunes said:
    We keep getting told that we're after 'good' players and they cost money in addition to being wanted by other clubs so they will be difficult to get over the line.
    I thought TS said we have our first 11 and we are only after players for 'depth' now
    I think he said we are almost there with our first 11. And if he was including Kirk (yet to start) Gilbey and Purrington in that then a couple more who could walk straight into the 11 and a back up RCB and LB and we are getting closer to what he wants.
    The full quote: 

    “I hope we can make a few more additions. Some of those will probably be more of the last-minute deadline day loan signings – simply just to create a little more depth in the squad. Because it is a long season, 46 games as a minimum.

    “We need a few more players in to strengthen the depth of the squad. We pretty much have the makings of a starting first-team now and a decent depth. By adding up to a handful more players before deadline then we will be well set for this season."

    ‘Some of those…’

    Says to me we will make signings, both for the first XI PLUS some to add to the squad depth.

    As mentioned before, I don’t think we need to read deep into every word he says.
    Yes, I agree. He is saying we don't have a starting 11 yet but we are almost there. It would be verbal suicide (which he is good at) if all the players brought in either warmed the bench or didn't make it that far.
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    Another day slips away. No sign signing signing yet.

    All I can say if this is what one gets from a 24 hour a day slog 7 days a week perhaps time and motion studies are required 
    Surely you mean another half day slips away.  
  • Rylo
    Rylo Posts: 860
    Another day slips away. No sign signing signing yet.

    All I can say if this is what one gets from a 24 hour a day slog 7 days a week perhaps time and motion studies are required 


  • Sponsored links:



  • Clarky
    Clarky Posts: 582
    Swisdom said:
    Another day slips away. No sign signing signing yet.

    All I can say if this is what one gets from a 24 hour a day slog 7 days a week perhaps time and motion studies are required 
    Surely you mean another half day slips away.  
    Not for a pessimist!
  • Another day slips away. No sign signing signing yet.

    All I can say if this is what one gets from a 24 hour a day slog 7 days a week perhaps time and motion studies are required 
    Tempus fugit as they say B)
  • I’ve actually stopped looking at this thread for actual rumours. It’s no ones fault that there are no names out there but I do find it a bit odd at this stage. I still think we’re in the process in some cases of first contact with potential targets. Astonishing really at this point.
  • I hope that I am wrong but this season is beginning to look like a disaster waiting to happen.

    We have about half a dozen decent players, the rest are simply not good enough.

    Some of the experienced pros like Inniss, Gilby, JFC, and Schwartz are not fit.

    The academy youngsters are too young and too inexperienced.

    The new players we have brought in, like the goalkeeper, Dobson and Clare are at best somewhere between poor and mediocre.

    The displays this season are more like relegation performances, rather than a team who is meant to be aiming for automatic promotion.

    Unless things change fast this is going to be a difficult, long hard season.
  • I’ve actually stopped looking at this thread for actual rumours. It’s no ones fault that there are no names out there but I do find it a bit odd at this stage. I still think we’re in the process in some cases of first contact with potential targets. Astonishing really at this point.
    Hopefully there is plenty of waffle to keep your spirits up.
  • CafcSteve said:
    CafcSteve said:
    How is Ronnie Moore still on this forum?
    He just deliberately makes things up and says ridiculous comments to wind everyone up.
    He’s obviously a Palace Fan!
    He’s a good lad. I believe he has taken up a coaching role at the club.
    He thought Clare was 9/10 yesterday 😂!
    I think he said he was eating Eclares yesterday?
  • Dizzle
    Dizzle Posts: 5,190
    Got to kick into gear soon surely 
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,828
    Leuth said:
    Clare has a first touch that doesn't go 10 yards tbf 
    Jason Euell?
  • barstool
    barstool Posts: 1,352
    Jason Pearce doesn’t need to do his coaching badges as he has already completed them. Just to correct a poster above 
This discussion has been closed.